Abstract
Shield back-face deformation (BFD) is the result of composite ballistic shields deflecting or absorbing a projectile’s energy and deforming towards the user. BFD can result in localized loading to the upper extremity, where the shield is secured to the user. An augmented anthropomorphic test device upper extremity was used to quantify this applied load. Four locations along the upper extremity were tested—the hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow—for investigating differing boundary conditions and their effect on resultant load. Varying stand-off distances, the distance between the back of the shield and the force sensor, were investigated. Digital image correlation was also conducted to measure the dynamic displacement of the shield. The mean peak back-face velocity of the shield was 208.4 ± 38.8 m/s, while the average affected area was 1505 ± 158.3 mm2. Impulse was not significantly affected by anatomical location for the same stand-off distance; however, as stand-off distance decreased, the measured force significantly increased (p < 0.05). Notably, impact duration did not differ significantly for any of the impact scenarios. This is the first step in developing injury criteria for this region resulting from behind shield blunt trauma, and these data will be used for developing injury thresholds in post-mortem human surrogates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ATD:
-
Anthropomorphic test device
- BABT:
-
Behind-armour blunt trauma
- BFD:
-
Back-face deformation
- BSBT:
-
Behind shield blunt trauma
- DIC:
-
Digital image correlation
- NIJ:
-
National Institute of Justice
- PMHS:
-
Post-mortem human surrogate
- PVC:
-
Polyvinyl chloride
- WorldSID:
-
Worldwide Harmonized Side Impact Dummy
References
Allanson-Bailey, L. Improved cranial fracture metrics for assessing the protective benefits of helmet systems. Doctoral dissertation, Platform Sciences Division, Dstl Porton Down: The Open University, 2016.
Amis, A., and J. Miller. The mechanisms of elbow fractures: an investigation using impact tests in vitro. Injury. 26(3):163–168, 1995.
Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 2015 Revision. Morton Grove, IL, 2015.
Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials. National Institute of Justice. NIJ Standard 0108.01 (1985).
Bass, C., R. Salazar, S. Lucas, M. Davis, L. Donnellan, B. Folk, et al. Injury risk in behind armour blunt thoracic trauma. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 12(4):429–442, 2006.
Bir, C. The evaluation of blunt ballistic impacts of the thorax. Doctoral dissertation, Detroit, MI, USA: Wayne State University, 2000.
Bir, C., R. Lance, S. Stojsih-Sherman, and J. Cavanaugh. Behind armour blunt trauma: recreation of field cases for the assessmnet of backface signature testing. 30th International Symposium on Ballistics, 2017.
Bolduc, M., J. -S. Binette, D. Fisher, and D. Hammond. Tactical ballistic shields operational testing protocol definition. Personal Armour Systems Symposium, 2018.
Cannon, L. Behind armour blunt trauma: an emerging problem. J. R. Army Med. Corps. 147:87–96, 2001.
Duma, S., P. Schreiber, J. McMaster, J. Crandall, and C. Bass. Fracture tolerance of the male forearm: the effect of pronation versus supination. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 8(216):649–654, 2002.
Freitas, C., J. Mathis, N. Scott, R. Bigger, and J. MacKiewicz. Dynamic response due to behind helmet blunt trauma measured with a human head surrogate. Int. J. Med. Sci. 11(5):409, 2014.
Griffin, L., R. Harris, R. Hayda, and M. Rountree. Loading rate and torsional moments predict pilon fractures for antipersonnel blast mine loading. IRCOBI, Isle of Man., UK, 2001.
Hardy, W., L. Schneider, and M. Reed. Comparison of airbag-aggresivity predictors in relation to forearm fractures. SAE Transactions, pp. 1366–1379, 1998.
Hisley, D., J. Gurganus, and A. Drysdale. Experimental methodology using digital image correlation to assess ballistic hlemet blunt trauma. J. Appl. Mech. 78(051022):1–7, 2011.
Kemper, A. Response corridors for the medial-lateral compressive stiffness of the human arm: implications for side impact protection. Accid. Anal. Prev. 50:204–222, 2013.
Martinez, A., A. Chakravarty, and C. Quenneville. The effect of impact duration on the axial fracture tolerance of the isolated tibia during automotive and military impacts. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 78:315–320, 2018.
Mölsä, J., U. Kujala, P. Myllynen, I. Torstila, and O. Airaksinen. Injuries to the upper extremity in ice hockey: analysis of a series of 760 injuries. Am. J. Sports Med. 5(31):751–757, 2013.
National Institute of Justice. Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor. NIJ Standard 0101.06, 2008.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Test Methodology for Protection of Vehicle Occupants Against Anti-vehicular Landmine Effects. RTO Technical Report, 2007.
Pintar, F., and N. Yoganandan. Dynamic bending tolerance of the human forearm. Traffic Injury Prev. 1(3):43–48, 2002.
Pintar, F. A., N. Yoganandan, N. Yogananda, and R. H. Eppinger. Response and tolerance of the human forearm to impact loading. SAE Trans. 107:2712–2719, 1998.
Prat, N., F. Rongiras, J. Sarron, A. Miras, and E. Voiglio. Contemporary body armor: technical data, injuries and limits. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 38(2):95–105, 2012.
Quenneville, C., and C. Dunning. Evaluation of the biofidelity of the HIII and MIL-Lx lower leg surrogates under axial impact loading. Traffic Injury Prev. 13(1):81–85, 2012.
Rafaels, K., H. Cutcliffe, R. Salzar, M. Davis, B. Boggess, B. Bush, and C. Bass. Injuries of the head from backface deformation of ballistic protective helmets under ballistic impact. J. Forensic Sci. 60(1):219–225, 2015.
Reeves, J., T. Burkhart, and C. Dunning. The effect of static muscle forces on the fracture strength of the intact distal radius in vitro in response to simulated forward fall impacts. J. Biomech. 47(11):2672–2678, 2014.
Schmitt, K. U., P. Niederer, M. Muser, and F. Walz. Trauma Biomechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
Steinmann, N., J. de Lange, J.-S. Binette, and C. Quenneville. Quantification of behind shield blunt trauma impacts using a modified upper extremity anthropomorphic test device. J. Biomech. Eng. 144(9):0910101–0910108, 2021.
Weisenbach, C., K. Logsdon, R. Salzar, V. Chancey, and F. Brozoski. Preliminary investigation of skull fracture patterns using an impactor representative of helmet back-face deformation. Mil. Med. 183(suppl_1):297–293, 2018.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the funding contributions of Defense Research and Development—Canada—Valcartier Research Centre and NSERC. They’d also like to acknowledge the contributions of Benoît Gauthier and Steven Kelly (DRDC) for their assistance during ballistic testing.
Conflict of interest
This study was funded by Defense Research and Development—Canada, who approved the design of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Jillian Urban oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
de Lange, J.E., Burrows, L.J., Binette, JS. et al. Behind Shield Blunt Trauma: Characterizing the Back-Face Deformation of Shields with a Focus on Upper Limb Loading. Ann Biomed Eng 51, 1331–1342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03141-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03141-0