Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensitivity Analysis for Multidirectional Spaceflight Loading and Muscle Deconditioning on Astronaut Response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sensitivity analysis for loading conditions and muscle deconditioning on astronaut response for spaceflight transient accelerations was carried out using a mid-size male human body model with active musculature. The model was validated in spaceflight-relevant 2.5–15 g loading magnitudes in seven volunteer tests, showing good biofidelity (CORA: 0.69). Sensitivity analysis was carried out in simulations varying pulse magnitude (5, 10, and 15 g), rise time (32.5 and 120 ms), and direction (10 directions: frontal, rear, vertical, lateral, and their combination) along with muscle size change (± 15% change) and responsiveness (pre-braced, relaxed, vs. delayed response) changes across 600 simulations. Injury metrics were most sensitive to the loading direction (50%, partial-R2) and least sensitive to muscle size changes (0.2%). The pulse magnitude also had significant effect on the injury metrics (16%), whereas muscle responsiveness (3%) and pulse rise time (2%) had only slight effects. Frontal and upward loading directions were the worst for neck, spine, and lower extremity injury metrics, whereas rear and downward directions were the worst for head injury metrics. Higher magnitude pulses and pre-bracing also increased the injury risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beeman, S. M., A. R. Kemper, M. L. Madigan, and S. M. Duma. Effects of bracing on human kinematics in low-speed frontal sled tests. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:2998–3010, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanpied, P., and H. Oksendahl. Reaction times and electromechanical delay in reactions of increasing and decreasing Force. Percept. Mot. Skills. 103:743–754, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bose, D., J. R. Crandall, C. D. Untaroiu, and E. H. Maslen. Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:1398–1407, 2010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhart, K., B. Allaire, D. E. Anderson, D. Lee, T. M. Keaveny, and M. L. Bouxsein. Effects of long-duration spaceflight on vertebral strength and risk of spine fracture. J. Bone Miner. Res. 35:269–276, 2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Correia, M. A., S. D. McLachlin, and D. S. Cronin. Vestibulocollic and cervicocollic muscle reflexes in a finite element neck model during multidirectional impacts. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49:1645–1656, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Decker, W., B. Koya, M. L. Davis, and F. S. Gayzik. Modular use of human body models of varying levels of complexity: validation of head kinematics. Traffic Inj. Prev. 18:S155–S160, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Devane, K., D. Johnson, and F. S. Gayzik. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj. Prev. 20:832–837, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaewsky, J. P., D. A. Jones, X. Ye, B. Koya, K. P. McNamara, F. S. Gayzik, A. A. Weaver, J. B. Putnam, J. T. Somers, and J. D. Stitzel. Modeling human volunteers in multidirectional, uni-axial sled tests using a finite element human body model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 47:487–511, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gehre, C., and S. Stahlschmidt. Assessment of dummy models by using objective rating methods. 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, DC, 2011.

  10. Greene, K. A., S. S. Withers, L. Lenchik, J. A. Tooze, and A. A. Weaver. Trunk skeletal muscle changes on CT with long-duration spaceflight. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49:1257–1266, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Institute of Medicine. Review of NASA’s Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.17226/18575.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, D. A., J. P. Gaewsky, J. T. Somers, F. S. Gayzik, A. A. Weaver, and J. D. Stitzel. Head injury metric response in finite element ATDs and a human body model in multidirectional loading regimes. Traffic Inj. Prev. 20:S96–S102, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemper, A. R., S. M. Beeman, M. L. Madigan, and S. M. Duma. Human occupants in low-speed frontal sled tests: effects of pre-impact bracing on chest compression, reaction forces, and subject acceleration. Traffic Inj. Prev. 15:S141–S150, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lalwala, M., B. Koya, F. S. Gayzik, and A. A. Weaver. Integration and validation of a deformable Spine into a simplified human body model. NHTSA Int. Work. Hum. Subj. Biomech. Res., 2020.

  15. LeBlanc, A., C. Lin, L. Shackelford, V. Sinitsyn, H. Evans, O. Belichenko, B. Schenkman, I. Kozlovskaya, V. Oganov, A. Bakulin, T. Hedrick, and D. Feeback. Muscle volume, MRI relaxation times (T2), and body composition after spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. 89:2158–2164, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McNamara, K. P., K. A. Greene, A. M. Moore, L. Lenchik, and A. A. Weaver. Lumbopelvic muscle changes following long-duration spaceflight. Front. Physiol. 10:627, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McNamara, K. P., K. A. Greene, J. A. Tooze, J. Dang, K. Khattab, L. Lenchik, and A. A. Weaver. Neck muscle changes following long-duration spaceflight. Front. Physiol. 10:1115, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meijer, R., E. Van Hassel, J. Broos, H. Elrofai, L. Van Rooij, and P. Van Hooijdonk. Development of a multi-body human model that predicts active and passive human behaviour. Proc. IRCOBI Conf. IRC-12–70, Dublin, Irel., pp. 622–636, 2012.

  19. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA technical standard NASA-STD-3001, Volume 2, Revision B, 2019.

  20. Newby, N., P. Greenhalgh, T. Reiber, and J. T. Somers. Soyuz landing risk characterization. NASA Hum. Res. Progr. Investig. Work., 2022.

  21. Pintar, F., P. Ivancic, M. Kleinberger, and J. Rupp. Occupant protection risk SRP research plan review. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jhonson Space Center, Houston, Texas, 2015. https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/reviews/

  22. Somers, J. T., D. Gohmert, and J. W. Brinkley. Application of the Brinkley dynamic response criterion to spacecraft transient dynamic events. NASA Tech. Memo. NASA/TM-2013–217380-REV1, 2017.

  23. Stavnichuk, M., N. Mikolajewicz, T. Corlett, M. Morris, and S. V. Komarova. A systematic review and meta-analysis of bone loss in space travelers. npj Microgravity. 6:13, 2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wismans, J., H. Van Oorschot, H. J. Woltring, and O. H. H. Response. Omni-directional human head-neck response. SAE Trans. 95:819–837, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wood, S. J., J. A. Loehr, and M. E. Guilliams. Sensorimotor reconditioning during and after spaceflight. NeuroRehabilitation. 29:185–195, 2011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye, X., D. A. Jones, J. P. Gaewsky, B. Koya, K. P. McNamara, M. Saffarzadeh, J. B. Putnam, J. T. Somers, F. S. Gayzik, J. D. Stitzel, and A. A. Weaver. Lumbar spine response of computational finite element models in multidirectional spaceflight landing conditions. J. Biomech. Eng. 142:051007, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a NASA Human Research Program Grant No. NNX16AP89G. The authors would like to thank Jeffrey Somers (NASA), Nathaniel Newby (KBR), and Keegan Yates (KBR) for their inputs on study design. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the GHBMC, NASA, or KBR. All simulations were run on the Distributed Environment for Academic Computing (DEAC) high-performance computing cluster at Wake Forest University with the support of Cody Stevens and Adam Carlson.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Gayzik is a co-owner and Dr. Weaver is a consultant of Elemance, LLC, which provides academic and commercial licenses for the GHBMC-owned human body computer models.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 575 N. Patterson Ave, Suite 530, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA

    Mitesh Lalwala, Karan S. Devane, Bharath Koya, F. Scott Gayzik & Ashley A. Weaver

  2. Virginia Tech-Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics, 575 N. Patterson Ave, Suite 530, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA

    Mitesh Lalwala, Karan S. Devane, Bharath Koya, F. Scott Gayzik & Ashley A. Weaver

  3. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 525 Vine Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA

    Fang-Chi Hsu

Authors
  1. Mitesh Lalwala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karan S. Devane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bharath Koya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fang-Chi Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Scott Gayzik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ashley A. Weaver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley A. Weaver.

Additional information

Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 8068 kb).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lalwala, M., Devane, K.S., Koya, B. et al. Sensitivity Analysis for Multidirectional Spaceflight Loading and Muscle Deconditioning on Astronaut Response. Ann Biomed Eng 51, 430–442 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03054-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03054-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation