Skip to main content
Log in

Anthropometric Landmarking for Diagnosis of Cranial Deformities: Validation of an Automatic Approach and Comparison with Intra- and Interobserver Variability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shape analysis of infant’s heads is crucial to diagnose cranial deformities and evaluate head growth. Currently available 3D imaging systems can be used to create 3D head models, promoting the clinical practice for head evaluation. However, manual analysis of 3D shapes is difficult and operator-dependent, causing inaccuracies in the analysis. This study aims to validate an automatic landmark detection method for head shape analysis. The detection results were compared with manual analysis in three levels: (1) distance error of landmarks; (2) accuracy of standard cranial measurements, namely cephalic ratio (CR), cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), and overall symmetry ratio (OSR); and (3) accuracy of the final diagnosis of cranial deformities. For each level, the intra- and interobserver variability was also studied by comparing manual landmark settings. High landmark detection accuracy was achieved by the method in 166 head models. A very strong agreement with manual analysis for the cranial measurements was also obtained, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.997, 0.961, and 0.771 for the CR, CVAI, and OSR. 91% agreement with manual analysis was achieved in the diagnosis of cranial deformities. Considering its high accuracy and reliability in different evaluation levels, the method showed to be feasible for use in clinical practice for head shape analysis.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarnivala, H., et al. Accuracy of measurements used to quantify cranial asymmetry in deformational plagiocephaly. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 45(8):1349–1356, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaumont, C. A. A., et al. Three-dimensional surface scanners compared with standard anthropometric measurements for head shape. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 45(6):921–927, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho, M. J., L. L. Borchert, and A. A. Kane. Diagnostic yield of routine skull radiographs in infants with deformational plagiocephaly. Cleft Palate-Craniofac. J. 54(5):497–501, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditthakasem, K., and J. C. Kolar. Deformational plagiocephaly: a review. Pedriatric. Nurs. 43(2):59–65, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  5. Düppe, K., M. Becker, and B. Schönmeyr. Evaluation of facial anthropometry using three-dimensional photogrammetry and direct measuring techniques. J. Craniofac. Surg. 29(5):1245–1251, 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ifflaender, S., M. Rüdiger, A. Koch, and W. Burkhardt. Three-dimensional digital capture of head size in neonates—a method evaluation. PLoS ONE. 8(4):e61274, 2013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ifflaender, S., M. Rüdiger, D. Konstantelos, K. Wahls, and W. Burkhardt. Early Human Development Prevalence of head deformities in preterm infants at term equivalent age ☆. Early Hum. Dev. 89:1041–1047, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunz, F., et al. Subjective perception of craniofacial growth asymmetries in patients with deformational plagiocephaly. Clin. Oral Investig. 25(2):525–537, 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung, A., P. Watter, and J. Gavranich. A clinical tool to measure plagiocephaly in infants using a flexicurve: a reliability study. Pediatr. Heal. Med. Ther. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S48864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martiniuk, A. L. C., C. Vujovich-Dunn, M. Park, W. Yu, and B. R. Lucas. Plagiocephaly and developmental delay: a systematic review. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 38(1):67–78, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meulstee, J. W., et al. A new method for three-dimensional evaluation of the cranial shape and the automatic identification of craniosynostosis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 46(7):819–826, 2017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meulstee, J. W., G. A. de Jong, W. A. Borstlap, G. Koerts, T. J. J. Maal, and H. Delye. The normal evolution of the cranium in three dimensions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 49(6):739–749, 2020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer-Marcotty, P., et al. Head orthesis therapy in infants with unilateral positional plagiocephaly: an interdisciplinary approach to broadening the range of orthodontic treatment. J. Orofac. Orthop. 73(2):151–165, 2012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer-Marcotty, P., H. Böhm, C. Linz, J. Kochel, A. Stellzig-Eisenhauer, and T. Schweitzer. Three-dimensional analysis of cranial growth from 6 to 12 months of age. Eur. J. Orthod. 36(5):489–496, 2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, R. I., and S. K. Clarren. Long-term developmental outcomes in patients with deformational plagiocephaly. Pediatrics. 105(2):e26–e26, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortenson, P. A., and P. Steinbok. Quantifying positional plagiocephaly: reliability and validity of anthropometric measurements. J. Craniofac. Surg. 17(3):413–419, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nahles, S., M. Klein, A. Yacoub, and J. Neyer. Evaluation of positional plagiocephaly: conventional anthropometric measurement versus laser scanning method. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 46(1):11–21, 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oliveira, B., et al., Automatic strategy for extraction of anthropometric measurements for the diagnostic and evaluation of deformational plagiocephaly from infant’s head models. In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2019, p. 9.

  19. Porras, A. R., et al. Quantification of head shape from three-dimensional photography for presurgical and postsurgical evaluation of craniosynostosis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 144(6):1051e–1060e, 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Rocco, F., V. Ble, P. A. Beuriat, A. Szathmari, L. N. Lohkamp, and C. Mottolese. Prevalence and severity of positional plagiocephaly in children and adolescents. Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 161(6):1095–1098, 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers, G. F. Deformational plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and scaphocephaly. Part I: terminology, diagnosis, and etiopathogenesis. J. Craniofac. Surg. 22(1):9–16, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaaf, H., J. F. Wilbrand, R. H. Boedeker, and H. P. Howaldt. Accuracy of photographic assessment compared with standard anthropometric measurements in nonsynostotic cranial deformities. Cleft Palate-Craniofac. J. 47(5):447–453, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Skolnick, G. B., S. D. Naidoo, D. C. Nguyen, K. B. Patel, and A. S. Woo. Comparison of direct and digital measures of cranial vault asymmetry for assessment of plagiocephaly. J. Craniofac. Surg. 26(6):1900–1903, 2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torres, H. R., et al. Anthropometric landmark detection in 3D head surfaces using a deep learning approach. IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Inform. 2194:1–1, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  25. Torres, H. R., et al. Deep Learning-based detection of anthropometric landmarks in 3D infants head models. In: SPIE Medical Imaging (2019).

  26. Torres, H. R., et al. 3D Facial Landmark Localization for cephalometric analysis [in press]. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’22) (2022).

  27. Weinberg, S. M., S. Naidoo, D. P. Govier, R. A. Martin, A. A. Kane, and M. L. Marazita. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J. Craniofac. Surg. 17(3):477–483, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilbrand, J. F., et al. Clinical classification of infant nonsynostotic cranial deformity. J. Pediatr. 161(6):1120-1125.e1, 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Willis, S., R. Hsiao, R. A. Holland, K. Lee, and K. Pitetti. Measuring for nonsynostotic head deformities in preterm infants during NICU management: a pilot study. Early Hum. Dev. 131:56–62, 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong, J. Y., et al. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate-Craniofac. J. 45(3):232–239, 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by projects “NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000045” and “NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000059”, supported by Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (Norte2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). This project was also funded by national funds (PIDDAC), through the FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and FCT/MCTES under the scope of the projects UIDB/05549/2020, UIDP/05549/2020 and Lasi-LA/P/0104/2020. The authors also acknowledge support from FCT and the European Social Found, through Programa Operacional Capital Humano (POCH), in the scope of the PhD grant SFRH/BD/136670/2018, SFRH/BD/136721/2018, and SFRH/BD/131545/2017.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena R. Torres.

Additional information

Associate Editor Ka-Wai Kwok oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres, H.R., Morais, P., Fritze, A. et al. Anthropometric Landmarking for Diagnosis of Cranial Deformities: Validation of an Automatic Approach and Comparison with Intra- and Interobserver Variability. Ann Biomed Eng 50, 1022–1037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-02981-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-02981-6

Keywords

Navigation