An objective of total knee replacement (TKR) is to restore the mechanical function of a normal knee. Joint kinematics and contact mechanics performance are two of the primary indices that indicate the success of TKR devices. The aim of this study was to compare the kinematics and contact mechanics of TKR and normal knee joints. An experimentally evaluated finite-element (FE) knee model was developed and used to investigate the performance of four TKR designs (fixed cruciate-retaining (CR), mobile CR, posterior-stabilized (PS), medial pivot design (MP)) and the normal knee joint during a gait cycle. The predicted kinematic results showed that the MP design presented similar kinematics to those of the normal knee joint and did not demonstrate paradoxical motion of the femur. A considerably larger contact area and lower contact pressure were found on the normal knee joint (1315 mm2, and 14.8 MPa, respectively) than on the TKRs, which was consistent with the previous in-vivo fluoroscopic investigation. The mobile CR and PS designs exhibited the smallest and greatest contact pressures of the four TKR designs, respectively. The results of the present study help to understand the kinematics and contact mechanics in the TKR during the gait cycle, and provide comprehensive information about the performance of the normal knee joint.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abdelgaied, A., C. L. Brockett, F. Liu, L. M. Jennings, Z. Jin, and J. Fisher. The effect of insert conformity and material on total knee replacement wear. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 228:98–106, 2014.
Abdelgaied, A., J. Fisher, and L. M. Jennings. A comprehensive combined experimental and computational framework for pre-clinical wear simulation of total knee replacements. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 78:282–291, 2018.
Abdelgaied, A., F. Liu, C. Brockett, L. Jennings, J. Fisher, and Z. Jin. Computational wear prediction of artificial knee joints based on a new wear law and formulation. J. Biomech. 44:1108–1116, 2011.
Archard, J. F., and W. Hirst. The wear of metals under unlubricated conditions. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 236:397–410, 1956.
Ardestani, M. M., M. Moazen, E. Maniei, and Z. Jin. Posterior stabilized versus cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty designs: conformity affects the performance reliability of the design over the patient population. Med. Eng. Phys. 37:350–360, 2015.
Baldwin, M. A., C. W. Clary, C. K. Fitzpatrick, J. S. Deacy, L. P. Maletsky, and P. J. Rullkoetter. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. J. Biomech. 45:474–483, 2012.
Baldwin, M. A., C. Clary, L. P. Maletsky, and P. J. Rullkoetter. Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend. J. Biomech. 42:2341–2348, 2009.
Bergmann, G., A. Bender, F. Graichen, J. Dymke, A. Rohlmann, A. Trepczynski, M. O. Heller, and I. Kutzner. Standardized loads acting in knee implants. PLoS ONE 9:2014.
Blaha, J. D. The rationale for a total knee implant that confers anteroposterior stability throughout range of motion. J. Arthroplast. 19:22–26, 2004.
Blankevoort, L., R. Huiskes, and A. de Lange. Recruitment of knee joint ligaments. J. Biomech. Eng. 113:94, 1991.
Bowman, K. F., and J. K. Sekiya. Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament, medial and lateral sides of the knee. Sports Med. Arthrosc. 18:222–229, 2010.
Cates, H. E., R. D. Komistek, M. R. Mahfouz, M. A. Schmidt, and M. Anderle. In vivo comparison of knee kinematics for subjects having either a posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 23:1057–1067, 2008.
Clarke, H. D., K. R. Math, and G. R. Scuderi. Polyethylene post failure in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 19:652–657, 2004.
Courtney, P. M., and G. C. Lee. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature. J. Arthroplast. 32:2028–2032, 2017.
de Beer, J., D. Petruccelli, A. Adili, L. Piccirillo, D. Wismer, and M. Winemaker. Patient perspective survey of total hip vs total knee arthroplasty surgery. J. Arthroplast. 27:865–869, 2012.
Erdemir, A. Open knee: a pathway to community driven modeling and simulation in joint biomechanics. J. Med. Device 7:040910, 2013.
Erdemir, A. Open knee: open source modeling and simulation in knee biomechanics. J. Knee Surg. 29:107–116, 2015.
Fan, C. Y., J. T. S. Hsieh, M. S. Hsieh, Y. C. Shih, and C. H. Lee. Primitive results after medial-pivot knee arthroplasties. A minimum 5-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplast. 25:492–496, 2010.
Fitzpatrick, C. K., C. Maag, C. W. Clary, A. Metcalfe, J. Langhorn, and P. J. Rullkoetter. Validation of a new computational 6-DOF knee simulator during dynamic activities. J. Biomech. 49:3177–3184, 2016.
Fregly, B. J., T. F. Besier, D. G. Lloyd, S. L. Delp, S. A. Banks, M. G. Pandy, and D. D. D’Lima. Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads. J. Orthop. Res. 30:503–513, 2012.
Fregly, B. J., W. G. Sawyer, M. K. Harman, and S. A. Banks. Computational wear prediction of a total knee replacement from in vivo kinematics. J. Biomech. 38:305–314, 2005.
Gray, H. A., S. Guan, L. T. Thomeer, A. G. Schache, R. de Steiger, and M. G. Pandy. Three-dimensional motion of the knee-joint complex during normal walking revealed by mobile biplane X-ray imaging. J. Orthop. Res. 37:615–630, 2019.
Gray, H. A., S. Guan, T. J. Young, M. M. Dowsey, P. F. Choong, and M. G. Pandy. Comparison of posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, and medial-stabilized knee implant motion during gait. J. Orthop. Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24613.
Griffith, C. J., C. A. Wijdicks, R. F. LaPrade, B. M. Armitage, S. Johansen, and L. Engebretsen. Force measurements on the posterior oblique ligament and superficial medial collateral ligament proximal and distal divisions to applied loads. Am. J. Sports Med. 37:140–148, 2009.
Halonen, K. S., M. E. Mononen, J. S. Jurvelin, J. Töyräs, and R. K. Korhonen. Importance of depth-wise distribution of collagen and proteoglycans in articular cartilage-A 3D finite element study of stresses and strains in human knee joint. J. Biomech. 46:1184–1192, 2013.
Halonen, K. S., M. E. Mononen, J. S. Jurvelin, J. Töyräs, J. Salo, and R. K. Korhonen. Deformation of articular cartilage during static loading of a knee joint—experimental and finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 47:2467–2474, 2014.
Harris, M. D., A. J. Cyr, A. A. Ali, C. K. Fitzpatrick, P. J. Rullkoetter, L. P. Maletsky, and K. B. Shelburne. A combined experimental and computational approach to subject-specific analysis of knee joint laxity. J. Biomech. Eng. 138:1–8, 2016.
Holzapfel, G. A., T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elast. 61:1–48, 2000.
Horiuchi, H., S. Akizuki, T. Tomita, K. Sugamoto, T. Yamazaki, and N. Shimizu. In vivo kinematic analysis of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending. J. Arthroplast. 27:1196–1202, 2012.
Jones, G. B. Arthroplasty of the knee by the Walldius prosthesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 50:505–510, 1968.
Khasian, M., B. A. Meccia, M. T. LaCour, and R. D. Komistek. Effects of the medial plateau bearing insert conformity on mid-flexion paradoxical motion in a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty design. J. Arthroplast. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.071.
Kim, Y.-H., J.-W. Park, and J.-S. Kim. Clinical outcome of medial pivot compared with press-fit condylar sigma cruciate-retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 32:3016–3023, 2017.
Knight, L. A., S. Pal, J. C. Coleman, F. Bronson, H. Haider, D. L. Levine, M. Taylor, and P. J. Rullkoetter. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading. J. Biomech. 40:1550–1558, 2007.
Kozanek, M., A. Hosseini, F. Liu, S. K. Van de Velde, T. J. Gill, H. E. Rubash, and G. Li. Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. J. Biomech. 42:1877–1884, 2009.
Kusayama, T., C. D. Harner, G. J. Carlin, J. W. Xerogeanes, and B. A. Smith. Anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of human meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg. Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2:234–237, 1994.
LaPrade, R. F., A. Tso, and F. A. Wentorf. Force measurements on the fibular collateral ligament, popliteofibular ligament, and popliteus tendon to applied loads. Am. J. Sports Med. 32:1695–1701, 2004.
Li, G., M. Kozanek, A. Hosseini, F. Liu, S. K. Van De Velde, and H. E. Rubash. New fluoroscopic imaging technique for investigation of 6DOF knee kinematics during treadmill gait. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 4:1–5, 2009.
Liu, F., M. Kozanek, A. Hosseini, S. K. Van de Velde, T. J. Gill, H. E. Rubash, and G. Li. In vivo tibiofemoral cartilage deformation during the stance phase of gait. J. Biomech. 43:658–665, 2010.
Mauerhan, D. R. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty mimicking patellar clunk syndrome a report of 5 cases. J. Arthroplast. 18:942–945, 2003.
Meneghini, R. M., M. D. Stefl, W. A. Hodge, and S. A. Banks. A cam-post mechanism is no longer necessary in modern primary total knee arthroplasty. J. Knee Surg. 32:710–713, 2019.
Naghibi Beidokhti, H., D. Janssen, S. van de Groes, J. Hazrati, T. Van den Boogaard, and N. Verdonschot. The influence of ligament modelling strategies on the predictive capability of finite element models of the human knee joint. J. Biomech. 65:1–11, 2017.
Navacchia, A., P. J. Rullkoetter, P. Schutz, R. B. List, C. K. Fitzpatrick, and K. B. Shelburne. Subject-specific modeling of muscle force and knee contact in total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 34:1576–1587, 2016.
O’Brien, S., Y. Luo, C. Wu, M. Petrak, E. Bohm, and J. M. Brandt. Computational development of a polyethylene wear model for the articular and backside surfaces in modular total knee replacements. Tribol. Int. 59:284–291, 2013.
Pabinger, C., A. Berghold, N. Boehler, and G. Labek. Revision rates after knee replacement: cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 21:263–268, 2013.
Reinders, J., R. Sonntag, and J. P. Kretzer. Wear behavior of an unstable knee: stabilization via implant design? Biomed. Res. Int. 2014:2014.
Sabatini, L., S. Risitano, G. Parisi, F. Tosto, P. F. Indelli, F. Atzori, and A. Massè. Medial pivot in total knee arthroplasty: literature review and our first experience. Clin. Med. Insights Arthr. Musculoskelet. Disord. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544117751431.
Sathasivam, S., P. S. Walker, P. A. Campbell, and K. Rayner. The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58:282–290, 2001.
Shahzad, M., A. Kamran, M. Z. Siddiqui, and M. Farhan. Mechanical characterization and FE modelling of a hyperelastic material. Mater. Res. 18:918–924, 2015.
Shu, L., S. Hashimoto, and N. Sugita. Enhanced in-silico polyethylene wear simulation of total knee replacement during daily activities. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02555-4.
Shu, L., S. Li, and N. Sugita. Systematic review of computational modelling for biomechanics analysis of total knee replacement. Biosurf. Biotribol. 6:3–11, 2020.
Shu, L., K. Yamamoto, S. Kai, J. Inagaki, and N. Sugita. Symmetrical cruciate-retaining versus medial pivot prostheses: the effect of intercondylar sagittal conformity on knee kinematics and contact mechanics. Comput. Biol. Med. 108:101–110, 2019.
Shu, L., K. Yamamoto, J. Yao, P. Saraswat, Y. Liu, M. Mitsuishi, and N. Sugita. A subject-specific finite element musculoskeletal framework for mechanics analysis of a total knee replacement. J. Biomech. 77:146–154, 2018.
Shu, L., J. Yao, K. Yamamoto, T. Sato, and N. Sugita. In vivo kinematical validated knee model for preclinical testing of total knee replacement. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104311; (In press).
Stäubli, H. U., L. Schatzmann, P. Brunner, L. Rincón, and L. P. Nolte. Mechanical tensile properties of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in young adults. Am. J. Sports Med. 27:27–34, 1999.
Tissakht, M., and A. M. Ahmed. Tensile stress-strain characteristics of the human meniscal material. J. Biomech. 28:411–422, 1995.
Tozzi, S., E. Modena, S. Falcioni, A. Sudanese, S. Affatato, and P. Taddei. The effects of contact area and applied load on the morphology of in vitro worn ultra-high molecular weight knee prostheses: a micro-Raman and gravimetric study. J. Raman Spectrosc. 45:781–787, 2014.
Von Keudell, A., S. Sodha, J. Collins, T. Minas, W. Fitz, and A. H. Gomoll. Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an age-dependent analysis. Knee 21:180–184, 2014.
Watanabe, T., H. Koga, M. Horie, H. Katagiri, I. Sekiya, and T. Muneta. Post-cam design and contact stress on tibial posts in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses: comparison between a rounded and a squared design. J. Arthroplast. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.010.
Zeller, I. M., A. Sharma, W. B. Kurtz, M. R. Anderle, and R. D. Komistek. Customized versus patient-sized cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo kinematics study using mobile fluoroscopy. J. Arthroplast. 32:1344–1350, 2017.
Zhang, J., Z. Chen, L. Wang, D. Li, and Z. Jin. A patient-specific wear prediction framework for an artificial knee joint with coupled musculoskeletal multibody-dynamics and finite element analysis. Tribol. Int. 109:382–389, 2017.
We would like to thank the Mr. Junichi Inagaki and Dr. Shin Kai for providing implant models for this study. The authors also thank Prof. Zhongmin Jin from Southwest Jiaotong University for advice and discussion on the knee modeling.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Number 20K20162.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Shu, L., Sato, T., Hua, X. et al. Comparison of Kinematics and Contact Mechanics in Normal Knee and Total Knee Replacements: A Computational Investigation. Ann Biomed Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02812-0
- Contact mechanics
- Finite element analysis
- Total knee replacement