Undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) programs typically consist of courses from several different academic departments combined with BME-specific courses taught by faculty trained in a variety of disciplines. While some students embrace this diversity in courses and disciplinary perspectives, many students struggle with how to translate these experiences into career opportunities. BME students are often concerned that they are perceived as a “jack of all trades, master of none.” In 2016, our department sought to find new ways to integrate BME professional practice into our curriculum. Informed by organizational change theory, we asked: (1) is there potential for change; (2) what strategies facilitate change; and (3) how can these strategies be implemented? As a result, we developed an Instructional Design Sequence, a new approach to instruction in which students, post docs, and faculty create short Modules that use evidence-based teaching practices to expose BME students to BME professional practice. This paper describes how the Sequence was conceptualized and demonstrates how theory can be used to inform practice. The resultant Sequence is a transferrable model for transforming engineering education, offering a mechanism for integrating new career relevant curriculum into undergraduate curriculum, while training future educators in instructional evidence-based practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Society for Engineering Education. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering. Washington: American Society for Engineering Education, 2013.
Anderson, W. A., U. Banerjee, C. L. Drennan, S. C. R. Elgin, I. R. Epstein, J. Handelsman, G. F. Hatfull, R. Losick, D. K. O’Dowd, B. M. Olivera, S. A. Strobel, G. C. Walker, and I. M. Warner. Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science 331:152–153, 2011.
Anderson, R. S., and B. W. Speck. Oh what a difference a team makes. Teach. Teach. Educ. 14:671–686, 1998.
Aune, B. P. The human dimension of organizational change. Rev. High. Educ. 18:149–173, 1995.
Berglund, J. The real world: BME graduates reflect on whether universities are providing adequate preparation for a career in industry. IEEE Pulse 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386001-9.00004-0.
Biomedical Engineer. 2016. https://money.cnn.com/gallery/pf/2015/01/27/best-jobs-2015/37.html.
Biomedical Engineering Bachelor’s Program Search. 2018. https://www.abet.org.
Borrego, M., S. Cutler, M. Prince, C. Henderson, and J. E. Froyd. Fidelity of implementation of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS) in engineering science courses. J. Eng. Educ. 102:394–425, 2013.
Borrego, M., J. Froyd, C. Henderson, S. Cutler, and M. Prince. Influence of engineering instructors’ teaching and learning beliefs on pedagogies in engineering science courses. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 29:34–58, 2013.
Borrego, M., and C. Henderson. Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: a comparison of eight change strategies. J. Eng. Educ. 103:220–252, 2014.
Bouwma-Gearhart, J. Science faculty improving teaching practice: identifying needs and finding meaningful professional development. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 24:180–188, 2012.
Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, and P. Felten. Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 16:133–145, 2011.
Bureau of Labor and Statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Biomedical Engineers. 2019. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/print/biomedical-engineers.htm.
Burke, W. W. Organization change: theory and practice. Found. Organ. Sci. 2:335, 2008.
By, T. R. Organisational change management: A critical review. J. Chang. Manag. 5:369–380, 2005.
Finelli, C. J., S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardson. Bridging the research-to-practice gap: designing an institutional change plan using local evidence. J. Eng. Educ. 103:331–361, 2014.
Goodwin, E. C., J. N. Cao, M. Fletcher, J. L. Flaiban, and E. E. Shortlidge. Catching the wave: are biology graduate students on board with evidence-based teaching? CBE Life Sci. Educ. 17:1–13, 2018.
Handelsman, J., D. Ebert-may, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, R. Dehaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Stewart, S. M. Tilghman, B. William, J. Handelsman, D. Ebert-may, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, R. Dehaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Stewart, S. M. Tilghman, and W. B. Wood. Scientific teaching. Science 304:521–522, 2010.
Harris, T. R. Recent advances and directions in biomedical engineering education. IEEE Eng. Med. Bio. 22:30–31, 2003.
Henderson, C., A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: an analytic review of the literature. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48:952–984, 2011.
Henderson, C., and M. H. Dancy. Increasing the impact and diffusion of STEM education innovations. New Orleans: Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education Forum, Impact and Diffusion of Transformative Engineering Education Innovations, 2011.
Huang-Saad, A., and E. Springer. Transforming biomedical engineering education through instructional design. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 24:17–24, 1976.
Jendrucko, R. J. The evolution of undergraduate biomedical engineering education and the professional opportunities for program graduates. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 24:17–24, 1976.
Katona, P. G. Biomedical engineering and the whitaker foundation: a thirty-year partnership. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34:904–916, 2006.
Kezar, A. J., and P. D. Eckel. The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? J. Higher Educ. 73:435–460, 2002.
Kotter, J. P. Leading change. Cambridge: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press, 1996.
Lattuca, L. R., and P. T. Terenzini. Center for the Study of Higher Education Preparing the Engineer of 2020 Faculty Survey. 2014. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/107459/E2020FacultySurvey.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.
Leavitt, M. Team-teaching: the benefits and challenges. Speak. Teach. 16:1–4, 2006.
Lewin, K. Force field analysis. Annu. Handb. Gr. Facil. 7:111–113, 1946.
National Academy of Engineering. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2005.
National Academy of Engineering. Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 1–26, 2012.
National Academy of Engineering. Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17226/18254.
OECD. Teaching Practices, Teachers’ Beliefs and Attitudes. In: Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, pp. 87–135, 2009.
Reid, A., L. O. Dahlgren, P. Petocz, and M. A. Dahlgren. Identity and engagement for professional formation. Stud. Higher Educ. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802457108.
Stain, M., et al. Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science 359:1468–1470, 2018.
Tanner, K., and D. Allen. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: on integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 5:1–6, 2006.
The Royal Academy of Engineering. Educating Engineers for the 21st Century. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering, 2007.
Uhl-Bien, M., R. Marion, and B. McKelvey. Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadersh. Q. 18:298–318, 2007.
The authors would like to thank Charles Henderson and Julie Libarkin for their thoughtful feedback in the process of strategizing how to approach instructional change. The authors would also like to thank Jaqueline Handley for her contributions to the initial implementation of the Incubator. The Instructional Design Sequence is now funded by NSF-EEC-1825669. Finally, the authors would like to thank the BME community, students, faculty, alumni and advisors for engaging in the process of identifying a change strategy.
The BME Incubator course materials are available on the TEEL website: teel.bme.umich.edu.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang-Saad, A., Stegemann, J. & Shea, L. Developing a Model for Integrating Professional Practice and Evidence-Based Teaching Practices into BME Curriculum. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 881–892 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02427-6
- Undergraduate education
- Biomedical engineering
- Organizational change
- Professional formation