Literature review articles provide a valuable mechanism for remaining informed amidst an ever-increasing body of scientific work. Condensing current advances into this disseminatable form is a critical activity for any research trainee. To systematize this multifaceted process, we present the “why, when, who, what, how, and where” of composing a literature review article. Commentaries include selection of a review topic, conducting modern literature searches using online databases, stepwise strategies for manuscript drafting, and prevention of plagiarism. The current work provides structures and guidance for this fundamental effort which can establish the basis for a trainee’s development of original research objectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Falagas, M. E., E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22:338–342, 2008.
Hoq, K. M. G. Information overload: causes, consequences and remedies-a study. Philos. Prog. 55:49–68, 2014.
Lahiry, S. and R. Sinha. Creativity is intelligence having fun, originality an undetected plagiarism! Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol.. In Press, 4:150. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_71_18.
Martin, E. R. The role of librarians in data science: a call to action. J. Escience Librariansh. 4:e1092, 2016.
McKeever, L., V. Nguyen, S. J. Peterson, S. Gomez-Perez, and C. Braunschweig. Demystifying the search button: a comprehensive PubMed search strategy for performing an exhaustive literature review. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 39:622–635, 2015.
Moher, D., L. Shamseer, M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, A. Liberati, M. Petticrew, P. Shekelle, and L. A. Stewart. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4:1, 2015.
National Institutes of Health Office of Intramural Research. General guidelines for authorship contributions. https://oir.nih.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/sourcebook/documents/ethical_conduct/guidelines-authorship_contributions.pdf.
Otfinowski, R., and M. Silva-Opps. Writing toward a scientific identity: shifting from prescriptive to reflective writing in undergraduate biology. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 45:19–23, 2015.
Pautasso, M. Ten. Simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9:e1003149, 2013.
Shkodkina, Y. M., and D. Pakauskas. Comparative analysis of plagiarism detection systems. Bus. Ethics Leadersh. 1:27–35, 2017.
Wright, T. M., J. A. Buckwalter, and W. C. Hayes. Writing for the Journal of Orthopaedic Research. J. Orthop. Res. 17:459–466, 1999.
We acknowledge support by the National Institutes of Health (P41 EB023833) towards the establishment of the Center for Engineering Complex Tissues and its educational programs. G.L.K. is supported by the Robert and Janice McNair Foundation MD/PhD Student Scholar Program. The authors gratefully acknowledge Mani Diba for advising “how” to engage in systematic literature searches and stepwise drafting processes, and we thank Alexander M. Tatara for the “draft skeleton” concept.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Associate Editor Jane Grande-Allen oversaw the review of this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Koons, G.L., Schenke-Layland, K. & Mikos, A.G. Why, When, Who, What, How, and Where for Trainees Writing Literature Review Articles. Ann Biomed Eng 47, 2334–2340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02290-5
- Review articles
- Literature review
- Academic writing
- Research training
- Graduate education
- Scientific integrity