Skip to main content
Log in

Why, When, Who, What, How, and Where for Trainees Writing Literature Review Articles

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Literature review articles provide a valuable mechanism for remaining informed amidst an ever-increasing body of scientific work. Condensing current advances into this disseminatable form is a critical activity for any research trainee. To systematize this multifaceted process, we present the “why, when, who, what, how, and where” of composing a literature review article. Commentaries include selection of a review topic, conducting modern literature searches using online databases, stepwise strategies for manuscript drafting, and prevention of plagiarism. The current work provides structures and guidance for this fundamental effort which can establish the basis for a trainee’s development of original research objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Falagas, M. E., E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22:338–342, 2008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoq, K. M. G. Information overload: causes, consequences and remedies-a study. Philos. Prog. 55:49–68, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lahiry, S. and R. Sinha. Creativity is intelligence having fun, originality an undetected plagiarism! Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol.. In Press, 4:150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, E. R. The role of librarians in data science: a call to action. J. Escience Librariansh. 4:e1092, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McKeever, L., V. Nguyen, S. J. Peterson, S. Gomez-Perez, and C. Braunschweig. Demystifying the search button: a comprehensive PubMed search strategy for performing an exhaustive literature review. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 39:622–635, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moher, D., L. Shamseer, M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, A. Liberati, M. Petticrew, P. Shekelle, and L. A. Stewart. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4:1, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Institutes of Health Office of Intramural Research. General guidelines for authorship contributions.

  8. Otfinowski, R., and M. Silva-Opps. Writing toward a scientific identity: shifting from prescriptive to reflective writing in undergraduate biology. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 45:19–23, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pautasso, M. Ten. Simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9:e1003149, 2013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shkodkina, Y. M., and D. Pakauskas. Comparative analysis of plagiarism detection systems. Bus. Ethics Leadersh. 1:27–35, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright, T. M., J. A. Buckwalter, and W. C. Hayes. Writing for the Journal of Orthopaedic Research. J. Orthop. Res. 17:459–466, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge support by the National Institutes of Health (P41 EB023833) towards the establishment of the Center for Engineering Complex Tissues and its educational programs. G.L.K. is supported by the Robert and Janice McNair Foundation MD/PhD Student Scholar Program. The authors gratefully acknowledge Mani Diba for advising “how” to engage in systematic literature searches and stepwise drafting processes, and we thank Alexander M. Tatara for the “draft skeleton” concept.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonios G. Mikos.

Additional information

Associate Editor Jane Grande-Allen oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koons, G.L., Schenke-Layland, K. & Mikos, A.G. Why, When, Who, What, How, and Where for Trainees Writing Literature Review Articles. Ann Biomed Eng 47, 2334–2340 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: