Airflow Simulations in Infant, Child, and Adult Pulmonary Conducting Airways
The airway structure continuously evolves from birth to adulthood, influencing airflow dynamics and respiratory mechanics. We currently know very little about how airflow patterns change throughout early life and its impact on airway resistance, namely because of experimental limitations. To uncover differences in respiratory dynamics between age groups, we performed subject-specific airflow simulations in an infant, child, and adult conducting airways. Airflow throughout the respiration cycle was calculated by coupling image-based models of the conducting airways to the global respiratory mechanics, where flow was driven by a pressure differential. Trachea diameter was 19, 9, and 4.5 mm for the adult (36 years, female), child (6 years, male), and infant (0.25 years, female), respectively. Mean Reynolds number within the trachea was nearly the same for each subject (1100) and Womersley number was above unity for all three subjects and largest for the adult, highlighting the significance of transient effects. In general, air speeds and airway resistances within the conducting airways were inversely correlated with age; the 3D pressure drop was highest in the infant model. These simulations provide new insight into age-dependent flow dynamics throughout the respiration cycle within subject-specific airways.
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) Multi-scale Lung Inspiration and expiration
This work was supported by an ALA Senior Research Training Grant and a University of California Presidential Postdoctoral Fellowship (J. M. Oakes). The authors would like to thank Dr. Jeff Feinstein at Stanford University for providing the thoracic CT images and examining the resulting 3D airway geometries. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. Weiguang Yang for assisting with the CT images and Adam Updegrove for providing modeling expertise. The authors acknowledge the Information Technology Services, Research Computing at Northeastern University for providing high performance computing resources.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest related to the work presented in this manuscript.
- 5.Choi, J., M. H. Tawhai, E. A. Hoffman, and C.-L. L. Lin. On intra- and intersubject variabilities of airflow in the human lungs. Phys. Fluids, 21(10):101901-1–17, 2009.Google Scholar
- 6.Comer, J. K., C. Kleinstreuer, C. S. Kim. Flow structures and particle deposition patterns in double-bifurcation airway models. Part 2. Aerosol transport and deposition. J. Fluid Mech., 435:55–80, 2001.Google Scholar
- 7.Comerford, A., C. Förster, and W. A. Wall. Structured tree impedance outflow boundary conditions for 3D lung simulation. J. Biomech. Eng., 132(8):081002:1–10, 2010.Google Scholar
- 35.Oakes, J. M., S. C. Shadden, C. Grandmont, and I. E. Vignon-clementel. Aerosol transport throughout inspiration and expiration in the pulmonary airways. Int. J. Numer. Method Biomed. Eng., e2847, 2017.Google Scholar
- 37.Persak, S. C., S. Sin, J. M. McDonough, R. Arens, and D. M. Wootton. Noninvasive estimation of pharyngeal airway resistance and compliance in children based on volume-gated dynamic MRI and computational fluid dynamics. J. Appl. Physiol., 111(6):1819–1827, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Sá, R. C., M. V. Cronin, A. C. Henderson, S. Holverda, R. J. Theilmann, T. J. Arai, D. J. Dubowitz, S. R. Hopkins, R. B. Buxton, and G. K. Prisk. Vertical distribution of specific ventilation in normal supine humans measured by oxygen-enhanced proton MRI. J. Appl. Physiol., 109(6):1950–1959, 2010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Tian, G., P. W. Longest, G. Su, R. L. Walenga, and M. Hindle. Development of a stochastic individual path (SIP) model for predicting the tracheobronchial deposition of pharmaceutical aerosols: effects of transient inhalation and sampling the airways. J. Aerosol Sci., 42(11):781–799, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar