Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 3606–3618 | Cite as

Improving Bioengineering Student Leadership Identity Via Training and Practice within the Core-Course

  • David M. Rosch
  • P. I. Imoukhuede
Article

Abstract

The development of a leadership identity has become significant in bioengineering education as a result of an increasing emphasis on teamwork within the profession and corresponding shifts in accreditation criteria. Unsurprisingly, placing bioengineering students in teams to complete classroom-based projects has become a dominant pedagogical tool. However, recent research indicates that engineering students may not develop a leadership identity, much less increased leadership capacity, as a result of such efforts. Within this study, we assessed two similar sections of an introductory course in bioengineering; each placed students in teams, while one also included leadership training and leadership practice. Results suggest that students in the leadership intervention section developed a strong self-image of themselves as leaders compared to students in the control section. These data suggest that creating mechanisms for bioengineering students to be trained in leadership and to practice leadership behaviors within a classroom team may be keys for unlocking leadership development.

Keywords

Leadership development Undergraduate education CATME StrengthsFinder Teambuilding Sophomore Core-course Engineering education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jennifer Amos for her assistance with the IRB process and for informative discussions. We would also like to thank Dr. Kelly Cross for informative discussions. The authors would also like to thank the Illinois Leadership Center for their participation in this work, in particular Jeff Yacup and Furqan Hadi. Finally, we would like to thank members of the BIOE201 teaching team: Dr. Dipanjan Pan, Jared Weddell, and Ali Ansari. This work was supported by National Science Foundation CBET Grant #1512598 (P. Imoukhuede).

References

  1. 1.
    Amos J., T. Vogel, and P. Imoukhuede. Assessing teaming skills and major identity through collaborative sophomore design projects across disciplines. American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, E. C. Strengths-based educating: a concrete way to bring out the best in students—and yourself: the confessions of an educator who got it right—finally!. Educ. Horiz. 83:180–189, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arvey, R. D., M. Rotundo, W. Johnson, Z. Zhang, and M. McGue. The determinants of leadership role occupancy: genetic and personality factors. Leadersh. Q. 17:1–20, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arvey, R. D., Z. Zhang, B. J. Avolio, and R. F. Krueger. Developmental and genetic determinants of leadership role occupancy among women. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:693–706, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asplund J., S. J. Lopez, T. Hodges and J. Harter. The Clifton StrengthsFinder® 2.0 Technical Report: development and Validation. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization, 2007, p. 37.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Austin, D. B. Building on a foundation of strengths. Educ. Horiz. 84:176–182, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barabino, G. A., M. O. Platt, and D. K. Kaul. Sickle cell biomechanics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12:345–367, 2010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borrego, M., and L. K. Newswander. Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. J. Eng. Educ. 97:123–134, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cantwell, L. Creating the teaching-learning environment you’ve always dreamed of. Educ. Horiz. 84:161–169, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Center I. L.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan, K.-Y., and F. Drasgow. Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: understanding the motivation to lead. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:481–498, 2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, S., X. Guo, O. Imarenezor, and P. I. Imoukhuede. Quantification of VEGFRs, NRP1, and PDGFRs on endothelial cells and fibroblasts reveals serum, intra-family ligand, and cross-family ligand regulation. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 1–21:383–403, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clabaugh, G. K. Strengths-based education: probing its limits. Educ. Horiz. 83:166–170, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clifton D. O. StrengthsQuest: discover and develop your strengths in academics, career, and beyond. Gallup Pr, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clifton D. O., E. Anderson, and Schreiner. StrengthsQuest: discover and develop your strengths in academics, career, and beyond. Gallup Organization, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coers, N., and M. Lorensen. Case study: student perceptions of groups and teams in leadership education. J. Leadersh. Educ. 8:93–110, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colbeck, C. L., S. E. Campbell, and S. A. Bjorklund. Grouping in the dark: what college students learn from group projects. J. High. Educ. 71:60–83, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Commission E. A. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooley, E. Training an interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Res. 25:5–25, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Neve, J.-E., S. Mikhaylov, C. T. Dawes, N. A. Christakis, and J. H. Fowler. Born to lead? A twin design and genetic association study of leadership role occupancy. Leadersh. Q. 24:45–60, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Derue, D., and S. Ashford. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:627–647, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duderstadt, J. Engineering for a changing world. Ann Arbor: The Millennium Project, University of Michigan, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dugan, J. P. Pervasive myths in leadership development: unpacking constraints on leadership learning. J. Leadersh. Stud. 5:79–84, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dugan, J. P., C. W. Bohle, M. Gebhardt, M. Hofert, E. Wilk, and M. A. Cooney. Influences of leadership program participation on students’ capacities for socially responsible leadership. J. Stud. Aff. Res. Pract. 48:65–84, 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dugan J. P., and S. R. Komives. Developing leadership capacity in college students: findings from a national study. A report from the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership. College Park, MD: National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs, 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Engineering, N. A. O. Educating engineers: preparing 21st century leaders in the context of new modes of learning: summary of a forum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, p. 36, 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Engineering, N. A. O. The engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fink, S. B., and S. Capparell. The Birkman method: your personality at work. Hoboken: Wiley, 2013.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gilkey, M. B., and J. A. L. Earp. Effective interdisciplinary training: lessons from the University of North Carolina’s student health action coalition. Acad. Med. 81:749–758, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Golding P., R. Gonzalez, G. Moreno, R. Schoephoerster, S. Starks, M. Vaughan, and J. Townsend. The creation and inauguration of engineering leadership: UTEP and Olin College innovation project. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE2015, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gonyea, R. M. Self-reported data in institutional research: review and recommendations. New Dir. Inst. Res. 73–89:2005, 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greenfield, D. The enactment of dynamic leadership. Leadersh. Health Serv. 20:159–168, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hackman, J. R., and R. Wageman. A theory of team coaching. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30:269–287, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Halstead, A., and L. Martin. Learning styles: a tool for selecting students for group work. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 39:245–252, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hiller N. J. An examination of leadership beliefs and leadership self-identity: constructs, correlates, and outcomes. 2005.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hoogstraten, J. The retrospective pre-test in an educational training context. J. Exp. Educ. 50:200–204, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Howard, G. S., and P. R. Dailey. Response-shift bias: a source of contamination of self-report measures. J. Appl. Psychol. 64:144–150, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang, Y.-R., and S.-M. Chang. Academic and cocurricular involvement: their relationship and the best combinations for student growth. J. College Student Dev. 45:391–406, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    ILA. Leadership Program Directory. http://www.ila-net.org/Resources/LPD/index.htm, 2015.
  40. 40.
    Inititative i.-S. E. SIIP: reforming Undergraduate Engineering to Engage Students. In: i-STEM News, edited by i.-S. E. Inititative. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 2013.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Involvement C. f. L. a.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kaufman, D. B., R. M. Felder, and H. Fuller. Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning teams. J. Eng. Educ. 89:133–140, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Keating, K., D. M. Rosch, and L. Burgoon. Developmental readiness for leadership: the differential effects of leadership courses on creating ready, willing, and able leaders. J. Leadersh. Educ. 13:1–16, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kumar, S., and J. K. Hsaio. Engineers earn “Soft Skills the Hard Way”: planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 7:18–23, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lemieux-Charles, L., and W. L. McGuire. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Med. Care Res. Rev. 63:263–300, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lewis, S. Introduction to positive psychology. In: Positive psychology at work, edited by N. Turner, J. Barling, and A. Zacharatos. New York: Wiley, 2011, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lewis, S. Positive leadership and change. In: Positive psychology at work, edited by N. Turner, J. Barling, and A. Zacharatos. New York: Wiley, 2011, pp. 101–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lopez, S. J. Strengths development research and resources. Educ. Horiz. 84:157–160, 2006.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lord, R. G., and R. J. Hall. Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. Leadersh. Q. 16:591–615, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Loughry, M. L., M. W. Ohland, and D. DeWayne Moore. Development of a theory-based assessment of team member effectiveness. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 67:505–524, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    NAE. Educating the engineer of 2020: adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    NAE. Infusing real world experiences into engineering education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, p. 36, 2012.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ohland, M. W., R. A. Layton, M. L. Loughry, and A. G. Yuhasz. Effects of behavioral anchors on peer evaluation reliability. J. Eng. Educ. 94:319–326, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ohland, M. W., M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R. Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker. The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self- and peer evaluation. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 11:609–630, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Organization T. G. Teach with your strengths: how great teachers inspire their students. In: Educational horizons. Princeton, NJ: Educational Horizons, 2006, p. 170–175.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Overocker E. G. Removing the exclusivity of leadership: an evaluation of first-year students’ perceptions of their skills. 2013.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Paul R., and L. C. Falls. Mapping career success competencies to engineering leadership capabilities. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE2015, p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pedron, S., E. Becka, and B. A. Harley. Spatially gradated hydrogel platform as a 3D engineered tumor microenvironment. Adv. Mater. 27:1567–1572, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Peterson, C. A primer in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pons, D. J. Changing importances of professional practice competencies over an engineering career. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 38:89–101, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pressler M. W. The role of strengths focus to improve teaching and learning. National-Louis University, 2011.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Program B. M. G. M. E. L.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Program T. E. G. L. H.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Reeve, D. W. There is an urgent need for engineering leadership education. Eng. Leadersh. Rev. 1:1–6, 2010.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Riley, D. Engineering thermodynamics and 21st century energy problems: a textbook companion for student engagement. Syn. Lect. Eng. 6:1–97, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rosch, D. M. Effects of classroom-based team experiences on undergraduate student leadership development: when practice does not make perfect. J. Leadersh. Educ. 14:104–118, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rosch, D. M., J. C. Anderson, and S. N. Jordan. Analyzing the effectiveness of multisource feedback as a leadership development tool for college students. J. Leadersh. Stud. 6:33–46, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rosch, D. M., D. Collier, and S. E. Thompson. An exploration of students’ motivation to lead: an analysis by race, gender, and student leadership behaviors. J. College Student Dev. 56:286–291, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rost, J. C. Leadership for the 21st century. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rottmann, C., R. Sacks, and D. Reeve. Engineering leadership: grounding leadership theory in engineers’ professional identities. Leadership 11:351–373, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Roxworthy, B. J., M. T. Johnston, F. T. Lee-Montiel, R. H. Ewoldt, P. I. Imoukhuede, and K. C. Toussaint, Jr. Plasmonic optical trapping in biologically relevant media. PLoS ONE 9:e93929, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schaffer, S. P., K. Lei, and L. Reyes Paulino. A framework for cross-disciplinary team learning and performance. Perform. Improv. Q. 21:7–21, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Schweikhart, S. B., and V. Smith-Daniels. Reengineering the work of caregivers: role redefinition, team structures, and organizational redesign. J. Healthc. Manag. 41:19, 1996.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Shertzer, J. E., and J. H. Schuh. College student perceptions of leadership: empowering and constraining beliefs. NASPA J. 42:111–131, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Snyder, C. R., S. J. Lopez, and J. T. Pedrotti. Positive psychology: the scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. California: Sage Publications, 2010.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stephens, C. M., and D. M. Rosch. Building leaders: a national examination of the leadership capacities within engineering undergraduate students*. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 31:986–997, 2015.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Team M. T. E. Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing: understanding the Stages of Team Formation. Mind Tools Ltd, 1996–2016.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Tuckman, B. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol. Bull. 63:384–399, 1965.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Tuckman, B. W., and M. A. C. Jensen. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Org. Manag. 2:419–427, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Villa E. Q., A. Esquinca, E. L. Mein, P. Golding, and S. Hug. An engineering student leadership development model for 21st century engineering: using sociocultural theory to inform practice. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE2015, p. 1–4.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wang, Q., Q. Wu, J. Feng, and X. Sun. Obstructive sleep apnea and endothelial progenitor cells. Patient Prefer. Adherence 7:1077, 2013.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Weddell, J. C., J. Kwack, P. I. Imoukhuede, and A. Masud. Hemodynamic analysis in an idealized artery tree: differences in wall shear stress between Newtonian and Non-Newtonian blood models. PLoS ONE 10:e0124575, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Winter K. D. Team Building in a Matrix Environment. In: W. L. Coaching (eds) PM Tools Workshop. Vienna, VA: Project Management Institute Washington DC Chapter 2010.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yukl, G. Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Education Program, College of Agriculture, Consumer and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations