Assessment of Transverse Isotropy in Clinical-Level CT Images of Trabecular Bone Using the Gradient Structure Tensor
- 660 Downloads
The aim of this study was to develop a GST-based methodology for accurately measuring the degree of transverse isotropy in trabecular bone. Using femoral sub-regions scanned in high-resolution peripheral QCT (HR-pQCT) and clinical-level-resolution QCT, trabecular orientation was evaluated using the mean intercept length (MIL) and the gradient structure tensor (GST) on the HR-pQCT and QCT data, respectively. The influence of local degree of transverse isotropy (DTI) and bone mineral density (BMD) was incorporated into the investigation. In addition, a power based model was derived, rendering a 1:1 relationship between GST and MIL eigenvalues. A specific DTI threshold (DTI thres) was found for each investigated size of region of interest (ROI), above which the estimate of major trabecular direction of the GST deviated no more than 30° from the gold standard MIL in 95% of the remaining ROIs (mean error: 16°). An inverse relationship between ROI size and DTI thres was found for discrete ranges of BMD. A novel methodology has been developed, where transversal isotropic measures of trabecular bone can be obtained from clinical QCT images for a given ROI size, DTI thres and power coefficient. Including DTI may improve future clinical QCT finite-element predictions of bone strength and diagnoses of bone disease.
KeywordsHuman proximal femur Structural anisotropy Clinical-level quantitative computed tomography Fabric tensors Degree of transverse isotropy
The authors wish to thank Ms. Linda Ringqvist for help with illustrations.
Conflict of interest
There is no financial or personal conflict of interest with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence the manuscript material and the authors work.
- 7.Dragomir-Daescu, D., J. Op Den Buijs, S. McEligot, Y. Dai, R. C. Entwistle, C. Salas, L. J. Melton, III, K. E. Bennet, S. Khosla, and S. Amin. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39(2):742–755, 2011.Google Scholar
- 8.Fedorov, A., R. Beichel, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, J. Finet, J. C. Fillion-Robin, S. Pujol, C. Bauer, D. Jennings, F. Fennessy, M. Sonka, J. Buatti, S. Aylward, J. V. Miller, S. Pieper, and R. Kikinis. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30(9):1323–1341, 2012.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lenaerts, L., and G. H. van Lenthe. Multi-level patient-specific modelling of the proximal femur. A promising tool to quantify the effect of osteoporosis treatment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 367(1895):2079–2093, 2009.Google Scholar
- 14.Liu, Y., P. K. Saha, and Z. Xu. Quantitative characterization of trabecular bone micro-architecture using tensor scale and multi-detector CT imaging. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 15(1):124–131, 2012.Google Scholar
- 15.Matsuura, M., F. Eckstein, E. M. Lochmuller, and P. K. Zysset. The role of fabric in the quasi-static compressive mechanical properties of human trabecular bone from various anatomical locations. Biomech. Model Mechan. 19:19, 2007.Google Scholar
- 19.Pahr, D., J. Schwiedrzik, E. Dall’Ara, and P. Zysset. Clinical versus pre-clinical FE models for vertebral body strength predictions. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 12:S1751–S6161, 2012.Google Scholar
- 20.Pieper, S., M. Halle, and R. Kikinis. 3D SLICER. I S Biomed Imaging. Vol. 1, pp. 632–635, 2004.Google Scholar
- 21.Pieper, S., W. Lorensen, W. Schroeder, and R. Kikinis. The NA-MIC Kit: ITK, VTK, Pipelines, Grids and 3D Slicer as an Open Platform for the Medical Image Computing Community. I S Biomed Imaging, Vol. 1, pp. 698–701, 2006.Google Scholar
- 24.San Antonio, T., M. Ciaccia, C. Müller-Karger, and E. Casanova. Orientation of orthotropic material properties in a femur FE model: a method based on the principal stresses directions. Med. Eng. Phys. 34(7):914–919, 2012.Google Scholar
- 27.Siris, E. S., P. D. Miller, E. Barrett-Connor, K. G. Faulkner, L. E. Wehren, T. A. Abbott, M. L. Berger, A. C. Santora, and L. M. Sherwood. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmeno-pausal women. JAMA 286(22):2815–2822, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Trabelsi, N., and Z. Yosibash. Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments. J. Biomed. Eng. 133(6):061001, 2011.Google Scholar
- 33.Varga, P. Prediction of Distal Radius Fracture Load Using HR-pQCT-Based Finite Element Analysis. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, 2009.Google Scholar
- 36.WHO. Assessment of Fracture Risk and Its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Geneve: WHO, 1994.Google Scholar