American Cancer Society, Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2011–2012. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-030975.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2013.
Aspert, N., D. Santa-Cruz, and T. Ebrahimi. Mesh: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002, pp. 705–708.
Azar, F., D. Metaxas, and M. Schnall. A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations. Acad. Radiol. 8:965–975, 2001.
Azar, F., D. Metaxas, and M. Schnall. Methods for modeling and predicting mechanical deformations of the breast under external perturbations. Med. Image Anal. 6:1–27, 2002.
Del Palomar, A., B. Calvo, J. Herrero, J. Lopez, and M. Doblare. A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast. Med. Eng. Phys. 30:1089–1097, 2008.
Eder, M., A. Schneider, H. Feussner, A. Zimmermann, C. Hoehnke, N. Papadopulos, and L. Kovacs. Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging. Biomed. Tech. 53:112–121, 2008.
Eder, M., F. von Waldenfels, A. Swobodnik, M. Klöppel, A. K. Pape, T. Schuster, S. Raith, E. Kitzler, N. Papadopulos, H. G. Machens, and L. Kovacs. Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging. Breast 21:152–158, 2012.
Han, L., J. H. Hipwell, C. Tanner, Z. Taylor, T. Mertzanidou, J. Cardoso, S. Ourselin, and D. J. Hawkes. Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation. Phys. Med. Biol. 57:455–172, 2012.
Holzapfel, G. A., T. C. Gasser, and M. Stadler. A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: continuum formulation and finite element analysis. Eur. J. Mech. A 21:441–463, 2002.
Hopp, T., M. Dietzel, P. A. Baltzer, P. Kreisel, W. A. Kaiser, H. Gemmeke, and N. V. Ruiter. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization. Med. Image Anal. 17:209–218, 2013.
Kovacs, L., M. Eder, R. Hollweck, A. Zimmermann, M. Settles, A. Schneider, M. Endlich, A. Mueller, K. Schwenzer-Zimmerer, N. Papadopulos, and E. Biemer. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16:137–145, 2007.
Kovacs, L., M. Eder, R. Hollweck, A. Zimmermann, M. Settles, A. Schneider, K. Udosic, K. Schwenzer-Zimmerer, N. Papadopulos, and E. Biemer. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann. Plast. Surg. 57:602–610, 2006.
Kovacs, L., A. Yassouridis, A. Zimmermann, G. Brockmann, A. Woehnl, M. Blaschke, M. Eder, K. Schwenzer-Zimmerer, R. Rosenberg, N. Papadopulos, and E. Biemer. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann. Plast. Surg. 56:229–236, 2006.
Krouskop, T., T. Wheeler, K. Kallel, B. Garra, and T. Hall. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason. Imaging 20:260–274, 1998.
Lapuebla-Ferri, A., A. D. Palomar, J. Herrero, and A.-J. Jimenez-Mocholi. A patient-specific FE-based methodology to simulate prosthesis insertion during an augmentation mammoplasty. Med. Eng. Phys. 33:1094–1102, 2011.
Lee, A. W., V. Rajagopal, T. P. Babarenda Gamage, A. J. Doyle, P. M. Nielsen, and M. P. Nash. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling. Med. Image Anal. 17:1256–1264, 2013.
Mertzanidou, T., J. Hipwell, M. J. Cardoso, X. Zhang, C. Tanner, S. Ourselin, U. Bick, H. Huisman, N. Karssemeijer, and D. Hawkes. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation. Med. Image Anal. 16:966–975, 2012.
Pathmanathan, P., D. Gavaghan, J. Whiteley, S. Chapman, and J. Brady. Predicting tumor location by modeling the deformation of the breast. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55:2471–2480, 2008.
Raith, S., M. Eder, F. von Waldenfels, J. Jalali, A. Volf, and L. Kovacs. Finite element simulation of the deformation of the female breast based on MRI data and 3-D surface scanning: an in vivo method to assess biomechanical material parameter sets. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference and Exhibition on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, edited by N. D’Apuzo. Lugano: Hometrica Consulting, 2012, pp 196–203.
Rajagopal, V., J. Chung, D. Bullivant, P. Nielsen, and M. Nash. Finite elasticity: determining the reference state from a loaded configuration. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 72:1434–1451, 2007.
Rajagopal, V., A. Lee, J. Chung, R. Warren, R. Highnam, and M. Nash. Creating individual-specific biomechanical models of the breast for medical image analysis. Acad. Radiol. 15:1425–1436, 2008.
Rajagopal, V., P. M. F. Nielsen, and M. P. Nash. Modeling breast biomechanics for multi-modal image analysis—successes and challenges. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2:293–304, 2010.
Roose, L., W. de Maerteleire, W. Mollemans, F. Maes, and P. Suetens. Simulation of soft-tissue deformations for breast augmentation planning. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Biomedical Simulation, edited by M. Harders and G. Szekely. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 197–205.
Samani, A., J. Bishop, M. Yaffe, and D. Pelwes. Biomechanical 3D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20:271–279, 2001.
Samani, A., and D. Plewes. A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples. Phys. Med. Biol. 49:4395–4405, 2004.
Samani, A., J. Zubovits, and D. Plewes. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples. Phys. Med. Biol. 52:1565–1576, 2007.
Schnabel, J., C. Tanner, A. Castellano-Smith, A. Degenhard, M. Leach, R. Hose, D. Hill, and D. Hawkes. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22:23–247, 2003.
Sommer, G., M. Eder, L. Kovacs, H. Pathak, L. Bonitz, C. Mueller, P. Regitnig, and G. A. Holzapfel. Multiaxial mechanical properties and constitutive modeling of human adipose tissue: a basis for preoperative simulations in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Acta Biomater. 9:9036–9048, 2013.
Tanner, C., J. H. Hipwell, and D. J. Hawkes. Statistical deformation models of breast compressions from biomechanical simulations. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Digital Mammography, edited by E. A. Krupinsk. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 426–432.
Tanner, C., J. Schnabel, D. Hill, and D. Hawkes. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. Med. Phys. 33:1758–1769, 2006.
van Houten, E., M. Doyley, F. Kennedy, J. Weaver, and K. Paulsen. Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17:72–85, 2003.
Wellman, P., R. Howe, E. Dalton, and K. Kern. Breast tissue stiffness in compression is correlated to histological diagnosis. Technical Report, Harvard Bio Robotics Laboratory, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 1999, pp. 1–15.