Optical Systems for Point-of-care Diagnostic Instrumentation: Analysis of Imaging Performance and Cost
- 696 Downloads
One of the key elements in point-of-care (POC) diagnostic test instrumentation is the optical system required for signal detection and/or imaging. Many tests which use fluorescence, absorbance, or colorimetric optical signals are under development for management of infectious diseases in resource limited settings, where the overall size and cost of the device is of critical importance. At present, high-performance lenses are expensive to fabricate and difficult to obtain commercially, presenting barriers for developers of in vitro POC tests or microscopic image-based diagnostics. We recently described a compact “hybrid” objective lens incorporating both glass and plastic optical elements, with a numerical aperture of 1.0 and field-of-view of 250 μm. This design concept may potentially enable mass-production of high-performance, low-cost optical systems which can be easily incorporated in the readout path of existing and emerging POC diagnostic assays. In this paper, we evaluate the biological imaging performance of these lens systems in three broad POC diagnostic application areas; (1) bright field microscopy of histopathology slides, (2) cytologic examination of blood smears, and (3) immunofluorescence imaging. We also break down the fabrication costs and draw comparisons with other miniature optical systems. The hybrid lenses provided images with quality comparable to conventional microscopy, enabling examination of neoplastic pathology and infectious parasites including malaria and cryptosporidium. We describe how these components can be produced at below $10 per unit in full-scale production quantities, making these systems well suited for use within POC diagnostic instrumentation.
KeywordsPOC optics Miniature optics Cost assessment Diagnostic imaging performance
We thank Dr. Nadarajah Vigneswaran at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Dental Branch, Houston, for his help and expertise in reviewing the oral pathology slides. We also thank Dr. Robert Kester at Rice University for his initial editing input of the paper material. This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) under Grants R01 CA124319 and R01 CA103830.
- 1.Arpa, A., G. Wetzstein, D. Lanman, and R. Raskar. Single lens off-chip cellphone microscopy. In: IEEE International Workshop on Projector-Camera Systems (PROCAMS), 2012.Google Scholar
- 3.Behr, M. A., E. Kokoskin, T. W. Gyorkos, L. Cédilotte, G. M. Faubert, and J. D. MacLean. Laboratory diagnosis for Giardia lamblia infection: a comparison of microscopy, coprodiagnosis and serology. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 8:33–38, 1996.Google Scholar
- 12.Farmer, P., J. Frenk, F. M. Knaul, L. N. Shulman, G. Alleyne, L. Armstrong, R. Atun, D. Blayney, L. Chen, R. Feachem, M. Gospodarowicz, J. Gralow, S. Gupta, A. Langer, J. Lob-Levyt, C. Neal, A. Mbewu, D. Mired, P. Piot, K. S. Reddy, J. D. Sachs, M. Sarhan, and J. R. Seffrin. Expansion of cancer care and control in countries of low and middle income: a call to action. Lancet 376:1186–1193, 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Industrial Machine Sales, Inc. Personal communication.Google Scholar
- 17.International Agency for Research on Cancer. In: World Cancer Report, edited by P. Boyle and B. Levin. Lyon. IARC, 2008.Google Scholar
- 21.Lee-Lewandrowski, E., J. L. Januzzi, S. M. Green, B. Tannous, A. H. Wu, A. Smith, A. Wong, M. M. Murakami, J. Kaczmarek, F. S. Apple, W. L. Miller, K. Hartman, and A. S. Jaffe. Multi-center validation of the Response Biomedical Corporation RAMP® NT-proBNP assay with comparison to the Roche Diagnostics GmbH Elecsys® proBNP assay. Clin. Chim. Acta 386:20–24, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Miller, A. R., G. L. Davis, Z. M. Oden, M. R. Razavi, A. Fateh, M. Ghazanfari, F. Abdolrahimi, S. Poorazar, F. Sakhaie, R. J. Olsen, A. R. Bahrmand, M. C. Pierce, E. A. Graviss, and R. Richards-Kortum. Portable, battery-operated, low-cost, bright field and fluorescence microscope. PLoS ONE 5:e11890, 2010.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Rodriguez, W. R., N. Christodoulides, P. N. Floriano, S. Graham, S. Mohanty, M. Dixon, M. Hsiang, T. Peter, S. Zavahir, I. Thior, D. Romanovicz, B. Bernard, A. P. Goodey, B. D. Walker, and J. T. McDevitt. A microchip CD4 counting method for HIV monitoring in resource-poor settings. PLoS Med. 2:663–672, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Weigum, S. E., P. N. Floriano, S. W. Redding, C. K. Yeh, S. D. Westbrook, H. S. McGuff, A. Lin, F. R. Miller, F. Villarreal, S. D. Rowan, N. Vigneswaran, M. D. Williams, and J. T. McDevitt. Nano-bio-chip sensor platform for examination of oral exfoliative cytology. Cancer Prev. Res. 3:518–528, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.World Health Organization. Laboratory Services in TB Control, Microscopy Part II. Geneva: WHO, 1998.Google Scholar
- 34.World Health Organization. Basic Malaria Microscopy: Part I. Learner’s Guide, 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO, 2010.Google Scholar