A New Method to Determine Rate-dependent Material Parameters of Corneal Extracellular Matrix
- 441 Downloads
The cornea protects internal ocular contents against external insults while refracting and transmitting the incoming light onto the lens. The biomechanical properties of the cornea are largely governed by the composition and structure of the stromal layer which is an extracellular matrix composed of collagen fibrils embedded in a hydrated soft matrix. The mechanical behavior of the corneal stroma has commonly been characterized using uniaxial tensile tests and inflation experiments. In the present study, unconfined compression experiments were used to investigate the influence of loading rates on compressive behavior of nineteen porcine corneal specimens. The experiments were performed at ramp displacement rates 0.15 μm/s (eight samples), 0.5 μm/s (six samples), and 1.0 μm/s (five samples). For all tests, a maximum compressive strain of 50% (five strain increments of 4% followed by three strain increments of 10%) was selected. The experimental data was analyzed by a transversely isotropic biphasic model and material parameters, i.e., the in-plane Young’s modulus, the out-of-plane Young’s modulus, and the permeability coefficient were calculated. It was observed that while the permeability coefficient decreased exponentially with increasing compressive strain, the in-plane and out-of-plane Young’s moduli increased exponentially with increasing strain. Furthermore, it was found that the equilibrium stress was almost rate independent.
KeywordsUnconfined compression Transversely isotropic biphasic model Stress relaxation experiments Porcine corneal stroma
This project has been funded in whole or in part with the start-up fund from Oklahoma State University. The authors would like to thank Ralphs Packing Co for providing the tissue samples.
Conflict of Interest
- 9.Cheng, X., H. Hatami-Marbini, and P. M. Pinsky. Modeling collagen-proteoglycan structural interactions in the human cornea. In: Computer Models in Biomechanics, edited by G. A. Holzapfel and E. Kuhl. Springer, 2013, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
- 18.Faber, C., E. Scherfig, J. U. Prause, and K. E. Sorensen. Corneal thickness in pigs measured by ultrasound pachymetry in vivo. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 35:39–43, 2008.Google Scholar
- 21.Foster, A., and S. Resnikoff. The impact of Vision 2020 on global blindness. Eye (London, England) 19:1133–1135, 2005.Google Scholar
- 23.Hatami-Marbini, H. Mechano-electrochemical mixture theories for the multiphase fluid infiltrated poroelastic media. In: Handbook on Micromechanics and Nanomechanics, edited by S. Li and X.-L. Gao Pan. Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., 2013, pp. 273–302.Google Scholar
- 25.Hatami-Marbini, H., and P. M. Pinsky. On mechanics of connective tissue: assessing the electrostatic contribution to corneal stroma elasticity. Material Research Society Proceedings. Boston, 2009, pp. 1239.Google Scholar
- 42.Maurice, D. M. The cornea and sclera. In: The Eye, edited by H. Davason. London Academic Press, 1984, pp. 1–184.Google Scholar
- 45.Pandolfi, A. Computational biomechanics of the human cornea. In: Computational Modeling in Biomechanics, edited by S. De, F. GuilaK and M. Mofrad. Springer, 2010, pp. 435–466.Google Scholar
- 46.Pandolfi, A., and G. A. Holzapfel. Three-dimensional modeling and computational analysis of the human cornea considering distributed collagen fibril orientations. J. Biomech. Eng. 130:061006-061001–061006-061012, 2008.Google Scholar