Abstract
Predicting neck kinematics and tissue level response is essential to evaluate the potential for occupant injury in rear impact. A detailed 50th percentile male finite element model, previously validated for frontal impact, was validated for rear impact scenarios with material properties based on actual tissue properties from the literature. The model was validated for kinematic response using 4g volunteer and 7g cadaver rear impacts, and at the tissue level with 8g isolated full spine rear impact data. The model was then used to predict capsular ligament (CL) strain for increasing rear impact severity, since CL strain has been implicated as a source of prolonged pain resulting from whiplash injury. The model predicted the onset of CL injury for a 14g rear impact, in agreement with motor vehicle crash epidemiology. More extensive and severe injuries were predicted with increasing impact severity. The importance of muscle activation was demonstrated for a 7g rear impact where the CL strain was reduced from 28 to 13% with active muscles. These aspects have not previously been demonstrated experimentally, since injurious load levels cannot be applied to live human subjects. This study bridges the gap between low intensity volunteer impacts and high intensity cadaver impacts, and predicts tissue level response to assess the potential for occupant injury.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnsley, L., S. M. Lord, B. J. Wallis, and N. Bogduk. The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. Spine 20(1):20–26, 1995.
Berglund, A., L. Alfredsson, I. Jensen, L. Bodin, and A. Nygren. Occupant- and crash-related factors associated with the risk of whiplash injury. Ann. Epidemiol. 13(1):66–72, 2003.
Brault, J. R., G. P. Siegmund, and J. B. Wheeler. Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. Clin. Biomech. 15(6):426–435, 2000.
Brolin, K., P. Halldin, and I. Leijonhufvud. The effect of muscle activation on neck response. Traffic Inj. Prev. 6(1):67–76, 2005.
Cambell, B., and D. S. Cronin. High rate characterization of automotive seat foams. In: Proceedings of SEM, 2007.
Chazal, J., A. Tanguy, M. Bourges, G. Gaurel, G. Escande, M. Guillot, et al. Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J. Biomech. 18(3):167–176, 1985.
Davidsson, J., C. Deutscher, W. Hell, A. Linder, P. Lovsund, M. Svensson, et al. Human volunteer kinematics in rear-end sled collisions. In: Proceedings of IRCOBI, Goteborg, 1998, pp. 289–301.
Deng, B. Kinematics of human cadaver cervical spine during low speed rear end impacts. PhD Thesis, Wayne State University, 1999.
Deng, B., P. C. Begeman, K. H. Yang, S. Tashman, and A. I. King. Kinematics of human cadaver cervical spine during low speed rear-end impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 44:171–188, 2000.
Dibb, A. T., R. W. Nightingale, J. F. Luck, V. C. Chancey, L. E. Fronheiser, B. S. Myers, et al. Tension and combined tension-extension structural response and tolerance properties of the human male ligamentous cervical spine. J. Biomech. Eng. 131(8):081008, 2009.
DiSilvestro, M. R., and J. K. Suh. A cross-validation of the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, indentation, and confined compression. J. Biomech. 34(4):519–525, 2001.
Galasko, C. S., P. M. Murray, M. Pitcher, H. Chambers, S. Mansfield, M. Madden, et al. Neck sprains after road traffic accidents: a modern epidemic. Injury 24(3):155–157, 1993.
Gehre, C., H. Gades, and P. Wernicke. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. In: Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, 2009.
Gilad, I., and M. Nissan. A study of vertebra and disc geometric relations of the human cervical and lumbar spine. Spine 11(2):154–157, 1986.
Green, D. W., J. E. Winandy, and D. E. Kretschmann. Mechanical Properties of Wood. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1999.
Happee, R. Inverse dynamic optimization including muscular dynamics, a new simulation method applied to goal directed movements. J. Biomech. 27(7):953–960, 1994.
Hynd, D., M. Svensson, X. Trosseille, M. van Ratingen, and J. Davidsson. Dummy requirements and injury criteria for a low-speed rear impact whiplash dummy. European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee, EEVC WG12 #505A, 2007.
Iatridis, J. C., L. A. Setton, M. Weidenbaum, and V. C. Mow. The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. J. Biomech. 30(10):1005–1013, 1997.
Ito, S., P. C. Ivancic, A. M. Pearson, Y. Tominaga, S. E. Gimenez, W. Rubin, et al. Cervical intervertebral disc injury during simulated frontal impact. Eur. Spine J. 14(4):356–365, 2005.
Ivancic, P. C., S. Ito, Y. Tominaga, W. Rubin, M. P. Coe, A. B. Ndu, et al. Whiplash causes increased laxity of cervical capsular ligament. Clin. Biomech. 23(2):159–165, 2008.
Ivancic, P. C., M. M. Panjabi, S. Ito, P. A. Cripton, and J. L. Wang. Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation. Eur. Spine J. 14(4):346–355, 2005.
Ivancic, P. C., A. M. Pearson, M. M. Panjabi, and S. Ito. Injury of the anterior longitudinal ligament during whiplash simulation. Eur. Spine J. 13(1):61–68, 2004.
Kleinberger, M. Importance of head restraint position on whiplash injury. In: Frontiers in Whiplash Trauma: Clinical & Biomechanical, edited by N. Yoganandan, and F. A. Pintar. Amsterdam: ISO Press, 2000, pp. 477–490.
Klinich, K. D., S. M. Ebert, C. A. Van Ee, C. A. Flannagan, M. Prasad, M. P. Reed, et al. Cervical spine geometry in the automotive seated posture: variations with age, stature, and gender. Stapp Car Crash J. 48:301, 2004.
Knaub, K. E., and B. S. Myers. Project F.2(c): Cervical Spine Muscles. Durham, NC: Duke University, 1998.
Kotani, Y., P. S. McNulty, K. Abumi, B. W. Cunningham, K. Kaneda, P. C. McAfee, et al. The role of anteromedial foraminotomy and the uncovertebral joints in the stability of the cervical spine. A biomechanical study. Spine 23(14):1559–1565, 1998.
Krafft, M., A. Kullgren, C. Tingvallb, O. Boströmc, and R. Fredrikssonc. How crash severity in rear impacts influences short- and long-term consequences to the neck. Accid. Anal. Prev. 32(2):187–195, 2000.
Krafft, M., A. Kullgren, A. Ydenius, and C. Tingvall. Influence of crash pulse characteristics on whiplash associated disorders in rear impacts—crash recording in real life crashes. Traffic Inj. Prev. 3(2):141–149, 2002.
Lee, K. E., A. N. Franklin, M. B. Davis, and B. A. Winkelstein. Tensile cervical facet capsule ligament mechanics: failure and subfailure responses in the rat. J. Biomech. 39(7):1256–1264, 2006.
Lee, K. E., J. H. Thinnes, D. S. Gokhin, and B. A. Winkelstein. A novel rodent neck pain model of facet-mediated behavioral hypersensitivity: implications for persistent pain and whiplash injury. J. Neurosci. Methods 137(2):151–159, 2004.
Lord, S. M., L. Barnsley, B. J. Wallis, and N. Bogduk. Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. A placebo-controlled prevalence study. Spine 21(15):1737–1745, 1996.
Lu, Y., C. Chen, S. Kallakuri, A. Patwardhan, and J. M. Cavanaugh. Neurophysiological and biomechanical characterization of goat cervical facet joint capsules. J. Orthop. Res. 23(4):779–787, 2005.
McConnell, W. E., R. P. Howard, J. V. Poppel, R. Krause, H. M. Guzman, J. B. Bomar, et al. Human head and neck kinematics after low velocity rear-end impacts understanding whiplash. Stapp Car Crash J. 39:215–238, 1995.
Myklebust, J. B., F. Pintar, N. Yoganandan, J. F. Cusick, D. Maiman, T. J. Myers, et al. Tensile strength of spinal ligaments. Spine 13(5):526–531, 1988.
Ono, K., K. Kaneoka, A. Wittek, and J. Kajzer. Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head-neck-torso kinematics during low-speed rear impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 41:339–356, 1997.
Panjabi, M. M., J. Cholewicki, K. Nibu, J. Grauer, and M. Vahldiek. Capsular ligament stretches during in vitro whiplash simulations. J. Spinal Disord. 11(3):227–232, 1998.
Panjabi, M. M., S. Ito, A. M. Pearson, and P. C. Ivancic. Injury mechanisms of the cervical intervertebral disc during simulated whiplash. Spine 29(11):1217–1225, 2004.
Panjabi, M. M., T. Oxland, K. Takata, V. Goel, J. Duranceau, M. Krag, et al. Articular facets of the human spine. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 18(10):1298–1310, 1993.
Panjabi, M. M., A. M. Pearson, S. Ito, P. C. Ivancic, S. E. Gimenez, Y. Tominaga, et al. Cervical spine ligament injury during simulated frontal impact. Spine 29(21):2395–2403, 2004.
Panzer, M. B. Numerical modelling of the human cervical spine in frontal impact. M.A.Sc Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2006.
Panzer, M. B., and D. S. Cronin. C4-C5 segment finite element model development, validation, and load-sharing investigation. J. Biomech. 42(4):480–490, 2009.
Panzer, M. B., J. B. Fice, and D. S. Cronin. Cervical spine response in frontal crash. Medical Engineering and Physics, 2010 (under review #MEP-D-10-00414).
Pearson, A. M., P. C. Ivancic, S. Ito, and M. M. Panjabi. Facet joint kinematics and injury mechanisms during simulated whiplash. Spine 29(4):390–397, 2004.
Quinlan, K. P., J. L. Annest, B. Myers, G. Ryan, and H. Hill. Neck strains and sprains among motor vehicle occupants—United States, 2000. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36(1):21–27, 2004.
Quinn, K. P., and B. A. Winkelstein. Cervical facet capsular ligament yield defines the threshold for injury and persistent joint-mediated neck pain. J. Biomech. 40(10):2299–2306, 2007.
Radanov, B. P., M. Sturengger, and G. Di Stefano. Long-term outcome after whiplash injury: a 2-year follow-up considering features of injury mechanism and somatic, radiologic, and psychosocial findings. Medicine 74(5):281–297, 1995.
Robbins, D. H. Anthropometric Specifications for Mid-Sized Male Dummy, Vol. 2. Ann Arbor, MI: NHTSA, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 1983.
Roberts, A. K., D. Hynd, P. R. Dixon, O. Murphy, M. Magnusson, M. H. Pope, et al. Kinematics of the human spine in rear impact and the biofidelity of current dummies. In: IMechE Conference Proceedings, 2002, pp. 227–246.
Siegmund, G. P., B. S. Myers, M. B. Davis, H. F. Bohnet, and B. A. Winkelstein. Mechanical evidence of cervical facet capsule injury during whiplash: a cadaveric study using combined shear, compression, and extension loading. Spine 26(19):2095–2101, 2001.
Siegmund, G. P., D. J. Sanderson, B. S. Myers, and J. T. Inglis. Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations. J. Biomech. 36(4):473–482, 2003.
Siegmund, G. P., D. J. Sanderson, B. S. Myers, and J. T. Inglis. Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Spine 28(7):671–679, 2003.
Siegmund, G. P., B. A. Winkelstein, P. C. Ivancic, M. Y. Svensson, and A. Vasavada. The anatomy and biomechanics of acute and chronic whiplash injury. Traffic Inj. Prev. 10(2):101–112, 2009.
Sundararajan, S., P. Prasad, C. K. Demetropoulos, S. Tashman, P. C. Begeman, K. H. Yang, et al. Effect of head-neck position on cervical facet stretch of post mortem human subjects during low speed rear end impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 48:331–372, 2004.
Szabo, T. J., and J. B. Welcher. Subject kinematics and electromyographic activity during low speed rear impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 40:295–315, 1996.
Thunnissen, J. G., J. S. Wismans, C. L. Ewing, and D. J. Thomas. Human volunteer head-neck response in frontal flexion: a new analysis. Stapp Car Crash J. 39:439–460, 1995.
Van der Horst, M. J. Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2002.
Van Ee, C. A., A. L. Chasse, and B. S. Myers. Quantifying skeletal muscle properties in cadaveric test specimens: effects of mechanical loading, postmortem time, and freezer storage. J. Biomech. Eng. 122(1):9–14, 2000.
Walker, L., E. Harris, and U. Pontius. Mass, volume, center of mass, and mass moment of inertia of head and head and neck of human body. Stapp Car Crash J. 17:525–537, 1973.
Winkelstein, B. A., R. W. Nightingale, W. J. Richardson, and B. S. Myers. The cervical facet capsule and its role in whiplash injury: a biomechanical investigation. Spine 25(10):1238–1246, 2000.
Winters, J. How detailed should muscle models be to understand multi-joint movement coordination? Hum. Mov. Sci. 14(4–5):401–442, 1995.
Winters, J. M., and L. Stark. Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. J. Biomech. 21(12):1027–1041, 1988.
Winters, J., and S. L. Woo. Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization. New York: Springer, 1990.
Yang, K. H., and V. L. Kish. Compressibility measurement of human intervertebral nucleus pulposus. J. Biomech. 21(10):1–3, 1988.
Yoganandan, N., S. Kumaresan, and F. A. Pintar. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. Clin. Biomech. 16(1):1–27, 2001.
Yoganandan, N., F. Pintar, J. Butler, J. Reinartz, A. Sances, S. J. Larson, et al. Dynamic response of human cervical spine ligaments. Spine 14(10):1102–1110, 1989.
Zuby, D. S., and A. K. Lund. Preventing minor neck injuries in rear crashes—forty years of progress. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 52(4):428–433, 2010.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Global Human Body Models Consortium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Stefan M Duma oversaw the review of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fice, J.B., Cronin, D.S. & Panzer, M.B. Cervical Spine Model to Predict Capsular Ligament Response in Rear Impact. Ann Biomed Eng 39, 2152–2162 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0315-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0315-4