Skip to main content
Log in

A Mechanical Analysis of Conduit Arteries Accounting for Longitudinal Residual Strains

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identification of an appropriate stress-free reference configuration is critically important in providing a reasonable prediction of the intramural stress distribution when performing biomechanical analyses on arteries. The stress-free state is commonly approximated as a radially cut ring that typically opens into a nearly circular sector, relieving much of the circumferential residual strains that exist in the traction-free configuration. An opening angle is often used to characterize this sector. In this study, we first present experimental results showing significant residual deformations in the longitudinal direction of two commonly studied arteries in the pig: the common carotid artery and the left anterior descending coronary artery. We concluded that a radially cut ring cannot completely describe the stress-free state of the arteries. Instead, we propose the use of a longitudinal opening angle, in conjunction with the traditional circumferential opening angle, to experimentally quantify the stress-free state of an artery. Secondly, we propose a new kinematic model to account for the addition of longitudinal residual strains through employing the longitudinal opening angle and performed a stress analysis. We found that with the inclusion of longitudinal residual strains in the stress analysis, the predicted circumferential stress gradient was decreased by 3-fold and the predicted longitudinal stress gradient was increased by 5.7-fold. Thus, inclusion of longitudinal residual strains has a significant effect on the predicted stress distribution in arteries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chuong, C. J., and Y. C. Fung. On residual stress in arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 108:189–192, 1986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, P. F. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol. Rev. 75:519–560, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dzau, V. J., and G. H. Gibbons. Vascular remodeling—mechanisms and implications. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 21:S1–S2, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fung, Y.-C., and S. Lui. Change of residual strains in arteries due to hypertrophy caused by aortic constriction. Circ. Res. 65:1340–1349, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwald, S. E., J. E. Moore, A. I. Rachev, T. P. C. Kane, and J.-J. Meister. Experimental investigation of the distribution of residual stress in the artery wall. J. Biomech. Eng. 119:438–444, 1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, H. C., and D. N. Ku. Contractile responses in arteries subjected to hypertensive pressure in seven-day organ culture. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29:467–475, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holzapfel, G. A., G. Sommer, M. Auger, P. Regitnig, and R. W. Ogden. Layer-specific 3D residual deformations of human aortas with non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35(4):530–545, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Humphrey, J. D. Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rachev, A. I., and S. E. Greenwald. Residual strains in conduit arteries. J. Biomech. 36:661–670, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taber, L. A., and J. D. Humphrey. Stress-modulated growth, residual stress, and vascular heterogeneity. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:528–535, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takamizawa, K., and K. Hayashi. Strain energy density function and uniform strain hypothesis for arterial mechanics. J. Biomech. 20:7–17, 1987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaishnav, R. N., and J. Vossoughi. Residual stress and strain in aortic segments. J. Biomech. 20:235–239, 1987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vossoughi, J. Longitudinal residual strains in arteries. In: Proceedings of the 11th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference, Memphis, TN, 1992.

  14. Zaucha, M. T., J. Raykin, W. Wan, R. Gauvin, F. A. Auger, L. Germain, T. E. Michaels, and R. L. Gleason. A novel cylindrical biaxial computer-controlled bioreactor and biomechanical testing device for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. A 15:3331–3340, 2009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institute of Health Grant number R21-HL085822. The authors would like to thank Dr. Alexander Rachev for his thoughtful discussions and insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolph L. Gleason Jr..

Additional information

Associate Editor Scott I. Simon oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, R., Gleason, R.L. A Mechanical Analysis of Conduit Arteries Accounting for Longitudinal Residual Strains. Ann Biomed Eng 38, 1377–1387 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9916-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9916-6

Keywords

Navigation