Skip to main content
Log in

Body Segment Parameter Estimation of the Human Lower Leg Using an Elliptical Model with Validation from DEXA

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate estimates of human body segment parameters (BSPs) are required for kinetic analyses of motion. The purpose of this study was to develop a geometric model of the human lower leg based on the mass distribution properties of the segment. Forty subjects were recruited from 4 human populations. Each population was randomly divided equally into model development (MD) and model validation (MV) groups. Participants underwent frontal and sagittal plane dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans and anthropometric measurements. Leg BSPs were calculated from the scan information and mass distribution properties in the two planes were determined. Further, a geometric model was developed based on the ensemble averages of the mass distribution information from the MD groups. The model was applied to the MV groups and mean absolute errors were calculated for each BSP and each population. Finally, BSP estimates from literature sources were also determined and compared against DEXA. The model developed produced the lowest errors overall. Additionally, the results showed that the model developed estimated BSPs for all four populations with consistent accuracy whereas the other 4 models tested provided different levels of accuracy depending on the age and gender categories of the group tested. The results of this study present a model that accurately estimates BSPs of the lower leg for individuals varying in age, gender, race, and morphology. This study also presents a modelling technique that may successfully provide similar results for other body segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Andrews, J. G., and S. P. Mish. Methods for investigating the sensitivity of joint resultants to body segment parameter variations. J. Biomech. 29:651–654, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Braune, W., and O. Fischer. The Centre of Gravity of the Human Body as Related to the German Infantryman. ATI 138 452. Leipzig: National Technical Information Service, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarys, J. P., and M. J. Marfell-Jones. Anatomical segmentation in humans and the prediction of segmental masses from intra-segmental anthropometry. Hum. Biol. 58:771–782, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clauser, C. E., J. T. McConville, and J. W. Young. Weight, Volume, and Center of Mass of Segments of the Human Body. AMRL-TR-69-70. Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dempster, W. T. Space Requirements of the Seated Operator. WADC-TR-55-159. Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drillis, R., and R. Contini. Body Segment Parameters. TR-1166-03. New York: School of Engineering Science, New York University, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Durkin, J. L. The prediction of body segment parameters using geometric modelling and dual photon absorptiometry. Unpublished thesis. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University, 1998.

  8. Durkin, J. L., and J. J. Dowling. Predicting moment of inertia of the human leg requires the use of an elliptical model. Proceedings of the XIth Congress of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics. Montreal, QC, p. 116.

  9. Durkin, J. L., and J. J. Dowling. Analysis of body segment parameter differences between four human populations and the estimation errors of four popular mathematical models. J. Biomech. Eng. 125:515–522, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Durkin, J. L., J. J. Dowling, and D. M. Andrews. The measurement of body segment inertial parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J. Biomech. 35:1575–1580, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Durkin, J. L., L. Scholtes, and J. J. Dowling. Using mass distribution information to model the human thigh for body segment parameter estimation. J. Biomed. Eng. 127:455–464 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanavan, E. P. A Mathematical Model of the Human Body. AMRL-TR-64-102. Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harless, E. Die statischen Momente der menschlichen Gliedmassen. Abhandl Mathematische-Physikalischen Classe Konigl Bayerischen Akad Wissenschaft 8:69–96 to 257–294, 1860.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hatze, H. A mathematical model for the computational determination of parameter values of anthropomorphic segments. J. Biomech. 13:833–843, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinrichs, R. N. Regression equations to predict segmental moments of inertia from anthropometric measurements: An extension of the data of Chandler et al. (1975). J. Biomech. 18:621–624, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, H. K. Evaluation of cross-sectional geometry and mass density distributions of humans and laboratory animals using computerized tomography. J. Biomech. 16:821–832, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen, R. K. Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. J. Biomech. 11:349–358, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, P. E., M. Mungiole, M. W. Marzke, and J. M. Longhill. The use of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring segment inertial properties. J. Biomech. 22:367–376, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mungiole, M., and P. E. Martin. Estimating segment inertial properties: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with existing methods. J. Biomech. 23:1039–1046, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearsall, D. J., J. G. Reid, and L. A. Livingston. Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 24:198–210, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Plagenhoef, S., F. G. Evans, and T. Abdelnour. Anatomical data for analyzing human motion. Res. Quart. Exerc. Sport. 54:169–178, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winter, D. A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 3 ed. New York: Wiley, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young, J. W., R. F. Chandler, and C. C. Snow. Anthropometric and Mass Distribution Characteristics of the Adult Female. FAA-AM-83-16. Oklahoma: FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zatsiorsky, V., and V. Seluyanov. The mass and inertia characteristics of the main segments of the human body. In: Biomechanics VIII-B, edited by H. Matsui and K. Kobayashi. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc., 1983, pp. 1152–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zatsiorsky, V., and V. Seluyanov. Estimation of the Mass and Inertia Characteristics of the Human Body by Means of the Best Predictive Regression Equations. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc., 1985, pp. 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zatsiorsky, V., V. Seluyanov, and L. G. Chugunova. Methods of determining mass-inertial characteristics of human body segments. In: Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics, edited by G. G. Chernyi and S. A. Regirer. Boston: CRC Press, 1990, pp. 272–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephanie Atkinson in the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University for providing access to a DEXA machine for this research project as well as NSERC for funding this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Durkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durkin, J.L., Dowling, J.J. Body Segment Parameter Estimation of the Human Lower Leg Using an Elliptical Model with Validation from DEXA. Ann Biomed Eng 34, 1483–1493 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9088-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9088-6

Keywords

Navigation