Skip to main content
Log in

The Past Is a Divided Country: Transforming Archaeology in South Africa

  • Original Article
  • Published:
African Archaeological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the political and institutional dimensions of archaeological practice in South Africa during the apartheid era and since the transition to democratic rule in 1994. We focus on the archaeological practices within institutional structures—the universities, heritage agencies, and museums. We examine the roles these institutions played in either perpetuating or challenging the disconnection between archaeological heritage and descendent communities prior to 1994, and whether the political changes that occurred since the end of apartheid have succeeded in creating an inclusive archaeological practice in South Africa. The Transformation Charter, adopted in 2008 by the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA), requires that all those working in the field of archaeology in South Africa practice a form of archaeology that is “rooted in social awareness and social engagement” and aims to be “socially responsible.” We examine the extent to which progress has been made towards achieving those objectives.

Résumé

Cet article examine les dimensions politique et institutionnelle de la pratique archéologique en Afrique du Sud pendant l’ère de l’apartheid et depuis le passage à un régime démocratique en 1994. Nous nous concentrons sur les pratiques archéologiques au sein de structures institutionnelles telles que les universités, les agences de protection du patrimoine et les musées. Nous examinons les rôles que ces institutions ont joué dans la perpétuation ou la contestation de la déconnexion entre le patrimoine archéologique et les communautés descendantes avant 1994, et si les changements politiques survenus depuis la fin de l’ère de l’apartheid ont permis de créer une archéologie sud-africaine réellement inclusive. La Charte de transformation, adoptée en 2008 par l’Association des archéologues professionnels d’Afrique australe (ASAPA), exige que tous ceux qui travaillent dans le domaine de l’archéologie en Afrique du Sud pratiquent une forme d’archéologie «enracinée dans la conscience et l’engagement sociaux». être «socialement responsable». Nous examinons dans quelle mesure des progrès ont été accomplis dans la réalisation de ces objectifs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deacon, J. (1990). Weaving the fabric of Stone Age research in southern Africa. In P. Robertshaw (Ed.), A history of African archaeology (pp. 39–56). London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, J. (1993). Archaeological sites as national monuments in South Africa: a review of sites declared since 1936. South African Historical Journal, 29, 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, J. (1997). South Africa’s new heritage legislation. World Archaeological Congress Newsletter, 5(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, J. (2000). Guest editorial: Heritage legislation. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 55, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delius, P., & Marks, S. (2012). Rethinking South Africa’s past: Essays on history and archaeology. Journal of Southern African Studies, 38, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowson, T. A., & Lewis-Williams, J. D. (1993). Myths, museums and southern African rock art. South African Historical Journal, 29(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frescura, F. (1991). National or nationalist: The work of the Monument’s Council, 1936-1989. In D. Japha & V. Japha (Eds.), Proceedings of the National Urban Conservation Symposium, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 12–14 July 1990. Cape Town: Oakville Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (1990). Hidden history: Iron Age archaeology in southern Africa. In P. Robertshaw (Ed.), A history of African archaeology (pp. 59–77). London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2005). Situational ethics and engaged practice: The case of archaeology in Africa. In L. Meskell & P. Pels (Eds.), Embedding ethics (pp. 169–194). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (1954). History of the South African Commission for the Preservation of Natural and Historical Monuments, Relics and Antiques in the Union of South Africa. The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 63(3/4), 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, T. N. (1980). Ceramics, classification and Iron Age entities. African Studies, 39(2), 123–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A. J. B. (2011). Guest editorial: A perspective on the last five decades of archaeology in South Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 66, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legassick, M., & Rassool, C. (2000). Skeletons in the cupboard: Museums and the incipient trade in human remains, 1907–1917. Cape Town: South African Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, J.D. (1972). The syntax and function of the Giant's Castle rock-paintings. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 27, 49–65.

  • Lewis-Williams, J.D. (1974). Superpositioning in a sample of rock-paintings from the Barkly East District. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 29, 93–103.

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D. (1981). Believing and seeing: symbolic meanings in southern San rock paintings. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D. (1983). The rock art of southern Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs, T. (1993). Three decades of Iron Age research in South Africa: Some personal reflections. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 48, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1989). South African archaeology 1922–1988. Johannesburg: The Archaeological Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matiyela, L. (1976). An interim report on the Turnstream Iron Age settlement: Site reconnaissance. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 31, 176–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazel, A. D. (2014). Further reflections on politics, education, and archaeology in the 1980s and early 1990s. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 69, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazel, A. D., & Mtshali, M. (1994). Reaching out: Introducing archaeology to children from disadvantaged communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Unpublished paper presented at the British Council ‘Heritage, education and archaeology’ seminar, Southampton, UK (September 1994).

  • Mazel, A. D., & Ritchie, G. (1994). Museums and their messages: The display of the pre-and early colonial past in the museums of South Africa, Botswana and Zimbabwe. In P. G. Stone & B. L. Molyneaux (Eds.), The presented past: Heritage, museums, and education. One World Archaeology 25 (pp. 225–236). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazel, A. D., & Stewart, P. M. (1987). Meddling with the mind: The treatment of San hunter-gatherers and the origins of South Africa’s Black population in recent South African school history textbooks. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 42, 166–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2005). Recognition, restitution and the potentials of postcolonial liberalism for South African heritage. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 60, 72–78.

  • Ndlovu, N. (2009a). Decolonizing the mind-set: South African archaeology in a postcolonial, post-apartheid era. In P. R. Schmidt (Ed.), Postcolonial Archaeologies in Africa (pp. 177–192). Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.

  • Ndlovu, N. (2009b). Transformation challenges in South African archaeology. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 64, 91–93.

  • Ndlovu, N. (2011). Legislation as an instrument in South African heritage management: Is it effective? Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 13(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu, N. (2012). Lewis Mncedisi Pretorious Matiyela 1951–2011. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 67, 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu, N. (2016). Old archaeology camouflaged as new and inclusive: South African archaeology in the 21st century. In P. Schmidt & I. Pikirayi (Eds.), Community archaeology and heritage in Africa: Decolonising practice (pp. 136–152). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogwaza, T. G. (1992). Archaeo-historical investigations of the wagon-making site at the Lovedale Mission Station, eastern Cape Province. Southern African Field Archaeology, 1(1), 40–45.

  • Parkington, J. (1987). Righting history (letter). Time, 130(9), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, D. W. (2015). Guest editorial: An Africanist view of South African archaeology. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 70(201), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggenpoel, C. A., & Robertshaw, P. (1981). The excavation of Smitswinkelbaai Cave, Cape Peninsula. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 36, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodéhn, C. (2013). “Thus our display will be honest but may be controversial”: Exhibiting pre-history during the South African democratization process. Nordisk Museologi, 2, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheermeyer, C. (2005). A changing and challenging landscape: Heritage resources management in South Africa. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 60, 121–123.

  • Schlanger, N. (2002). Making the past for South Africa’s future: The prehistory of field-marshal smuts (1920s-1940s). Antiquity, 76, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. (2003). The Burkitt affair revisited. Colonial implications and identity politics in early South African prehistoric research. Archaeological Dialogues, 10(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrire, C. (1995). Digging through darkness. Chronicles of an archaeologist. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrire, C. (2003). In memoriam, Raymond Robert Inskeep. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 58, 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, N. (1998). Archaeology and postcolonialism in South Africa: The theory, practice and politics of archaeology after apartheid. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, South Africa.

  • Shepherd, N. (2002a). Disciplining archaeology: The invention of South African prehistory, 1923-1953. Kronos, 28, 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, N. (2002b). The politics of archaeology in Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, N. (2003a). State of the discipline: Science, culture and identity in South African archaeology, 1870-2003. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(4), 823–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, N. (2003b). ‘When the hand that holds the trowel is black . . .’. Disciplinary practices of self-representation and the issue of ‘native’ labour in archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 3, 334–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, N. (2005). Who is doing courses in archaeology at South African universities? And what are they studying? South African Archaeological Bulletin, 60, 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B. (1983). The Hotnot syndrome: Myth-making in South African school textbooks. Social Dynamics, 9, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.W. (2009). Transformation charter for South African archaeology. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 64, 87–89.

  • Trigger, B. (1990). The history of African archaeology in world perspective. In P. Robertshaw (Ed.), A history of African archaeology (pp. 309–319). London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, L. (1997). Introduction. In L. Wadley (Ed.), Our gendered past: Archaeological studies of gender in southern Africa (pp. 1–11). Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, L. (2013). Reflecting on transformation in South African archaeology. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 68, 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., & Mazel, A. D. (1987). Bastions of ideology: The depiction of precolonial history in the museums of Natal and KwaZulu. Southern African Museums Association Bulletin, 17, 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., & Mazel, A. D. (1991). Controlling the past in the museums of Natal and KwaZulu. Critical Arts, 5(3), 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the institutional support that we received from the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology at the University of Pretoria and the Centre for Rock Art Research + Management in the School of Social Sciences at the University of Western Australia. The Archaeology Division of the University of the Witwatersrand and the Rock Art Research Institute, both in Johannesburg, provided the base for our joint research in the early preparations for this paper. We are indebted to them. We thank the National Research Foundation of South Africa, the African World Heritage Fund, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation for the financial support. We thank the dozens of archaeologists who agreed to be interviewed for this research and Ms. Swanepoel and Ms. Erasmus for the museum visitor figures. The views expressed in this paper are our own and may not reflect the views of those who have supported our research. This paper benefited greatly from the insightful comments of Janette Deacon and Aron David Mazel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ndukuyakhe Ndlovu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndlovu, N., Smith, B. The Past Is a Divided Country: Transforming Archaeology in South Africa. Afr Archaeol Rev 36, 175–192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-019-09336-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-019-09336-y

Keywords

Navigation