Advertisement

African Archaeological Review

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 75–95 | Cite as

Decisive Evidence for Multidirectional Evolution of Sociopolitical Complexity in Southern Africa

  • Shadreck Chirikure
  • Foreman Bandama
  • Michelle House
  • Abigail Moffett
  • Tawanda Mukwende
  • Mark Pollard
Original Article

Abstract

While pioneers of archaeology in any given region have established the foundations of the discipline, their views have not remained unchanged in places such as Europe, North America and Australasia. In these regions, successive generations of researchers changed the direction of their work based not just on new observations but also in light of new methods and theories. For example, the idea of a Bronze Age revolution popularised by V. G. Childe in Europe was superseded by multiple alternatives over the years. In southern African Iron Age studies, John Schofield, Gertrude Caton-Thompson, Roger Summers, Keith Robinson and Peter Garlake created an impressive platform upon which successors could build. Confronting firm disapproval from more experienced researchers in the early 1980s, Huffman speculated that the evolution of sociopolitical complexity in our region was a linear relay from Mapungubwe to Khami via Great Zimbabwe. This position was sustained as the conventional wisdom largely, we argue, because no new research was being carried out in key areas of the region, and too few students, in particular African ones, were being trained to expand the focus of investigation. Here, we present new data to support our argument, that the pathway to sociopolitical complexity in southern Africa was multilinear. We propose looking forward rather than back, and to continue to seek the exposure of scales of interaction between multiple but chronologically overlapping entities associated with the rise of sociopolitical complexity in southern Africa.

Keywords

Multilinear evolution of complexity Northeastern Botswana Southwestern Zimbabwe Mapela Great Zimbabwe Southern Africa 

Résumé

Tandis que les pionniers de l’archéologie à travers le monde posèrent les bases de la discipline, leurs positions furent révisées dans de nombreux lieux tels que l’Europe, l’Amérique du Nord ou l’Australie. Dans ces régions, les différentes générations de méthodes et l’émergence de théories novatrices. Par exemple, l’idée d’une révolution à l’Âge de Bronze popularisée par V.G. Childe en Europe fut remplacée par diverses alternatives au cours du temps. Dans les études sur l’Âge de Fer en Afrique Australe, John Schofield, Gertrude Caton-Thompson, Roger Summers, Keith Robinson et Peter Garlake offrirent une importante contribution sur laquelle leurs successeurs purent s’appuyer. Provenant d’un champ théorique différent, Thomas Huffman revisita et réinterpréta une grande partie des approches développées tant par ses prédécesseurs que par ses contemporains. En particulier, et malgré la réprobation de chercheurs plus expérimentés dans le début des années 1980, il suggéra que l’évolution de la complexité sociopolitique dans nos régions se transmit de façon linéaire de Mapungubwe à Khami à travers le Grand Zimbabwe. Nous soutenons quant à nous que l’acceptation conventionnelle de cette théorie ne se maintint qu’en raison de l’absence de nouvelle recherche au sein des zones clés de cette région et du manque d’étudiants adéquatement formés pour contribuer à la discussion. Ici, à l’aide de nouvelles données, nous maintenons que le passage à la complexité sociopolitique en Afrique Australe fut multilinéaire. Nous proposons dès lors qu’un bon moyen de faire avancer la discipline consiste à continuer l’exploration des différents niveaux d’interaction entre des entités diverses qui se rencontrèrent à travers le temps et qui participèrent à l’apparition de la complexité sociopolitique en Afrique Australe.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research at Mapela, Great Zimbabwe and Khami was carried out under permits from the National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe. We thank the Executive Director, Dr. Mahachi, and his team for this and other forms of support. We owe a big debt of gratitude, too big to repay, to Adria LaViolette for generously providing guidance on the structuring of the paper and comments on earlier drafts despite her many commitments. Robert Morrell, David Killick, Chap Kusimba, Innocent Pikirayi, Gilbert Pwiti, Simon Hall, Catrien van Waarden and Tim Maggs are always good sounding-boards for our new ideas. Financial support from PERC (University of Cape Town Research Office), University of Cape Town and the National Research Foundation is acknowledged with gratitude.

References

  1. Beach, D. N. (1980). The Shona and Zimbabwe 900–1850. Gwelo: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, D. N. (1984). Zimbabwe before 1900. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, D. N. (1994). A Zimbabwean past: Shona dynastic histories and oral traditions. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beach, D. N. (1998). Cognitive archaeology and imaginary history at Great Zimbabwe. Current Anthropology, 39, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach, D. N., Bourdillon, M. F. C., Denbow, J. R., Hall, M., Lane, P. J., Pikirayi, I., Pwiti, G., & Huffman, T. N. (1997). Review feature on snakes and crocodiles: Power and symbolism in ancient Zimbabwe. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 52, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdillon, M. F. C. (1998). Cognitive archaeology and imaginary history at Great Zimbabwe. Current Anthropology, 39, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronk Ramsey, C. (1994). Analysis of chronological information and radiocarbon calibration: The program OxCal. Archaeological Computing Newsletter, 41, 11–16.Google Scholar
  8. Caton-Thompson, G. (1931). The Zimbabwe culture: Ruins and reactions. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  9. Chirikure, S., & Pikirayi, I. (2008). Inside and outside the dry stone walls: Revisiting the material culture of Great Zimbabwe. Antiquity, 82, 976–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Ndoro, W., & Pwiti, G. (2010). Unfulfilled promises? Heritage management and community participation at some of Africa’s cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1-2), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., & Pollard, A. M. (2012). When science alone is not enough: Radiocarbon timescales, history, ethnography and elite settlements in southern Africa. Journal of Social Archaeology, 12(3), 356–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chirikure, S., Pollard, A. M., Manyanga, M., & Bandama, F. (2013a). A Bayesian chronology of Great Zimbabwe: Re-threading the sequence of a vandalized monument. Antiquity, 87(337), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Pikirayi, I., & Pollard, M. (2013b). New pathways of socio-political complexity in southern Africa. African Archaeological Review, 30(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Pollard, A. M., Bandama, F., Mahachi, G., & Pikirayi, I. (2014). Zimbabwe culture before Mapungubwe: New evidence from Mapela Hill, South-Western Zimbabwe. PLoS One, 9(10), e111224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collett, D., Vines, A., & Hughes, G. (1992). Dating and chronologies of the Valley Enclosures: Implications for the interpretation of Great Zimbabwe. African Archaeological Review, 10, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas, M. (1967). Witch beliefs in central Africa’. Africa, 37(1), 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner, G. A. (1963). Mapungubwe (Vol. 2). Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik.Google Scholar
  18. Garlake, P. S. (1966). Iron Age archaeology. Shashe Expedition, 19-22.Google Scholar
  19. Garlake, P. S. (1968). Test excavations at Mapela Hill, near the Shashe River, Rhodesia. Arnoldia, 34(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
  20. Garlake, P. S. (1970). Rhodesian ruins: A preliminary assessment of their styles and chronology. Journal of African History, 11(4), 495–513.Google Scholar
  21. Garlake, P. S. (1973). Great Zimbabwe. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  22. Garlake, P. S. (1982). Prehistory and ideology in Zimbabwe. Africa, 52(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gosden, C. (2012). Postcolonial archaeology. Archaeological Theory Today, 251-266.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, M. (1984). The burden of tribalism: The social context of southern African Iron Age studies. American Antiquity, 49(3), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanisch, E. (2008). Reinterpreting the origins of Dzata: Archaeology and legends. In N. Swanepoel, A. Esterhuysen, & P. Bonner (Eds.), Five hundred years rediscovered: Southern African precedents and prospects (pp.119–132). Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hogg, A. G., Hua, Q., Blackwell, P. G., Niu, M., Buck, C. E., Guilderson, T. P., Heaton, T. J., Palmer, J. G., Reimer, P. J., Reimer, R. W., Turney, C. S. M., & Zimmerman, S. R. H. (2013). SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon, 55(4), 1889–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huffman, T. N. (1974). The Leopard's Kopje Tradition. Salisbury: National Museums and Monuments (Memoir 6).Google Scholar
  28. Huffman, T. N. (1982). Archaeology and ethnohistory of the African Iron Age. Annual Review of Anthropology, 11, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huffman, T. N. (1996). Snakes and crocodiles: Power of symbolism in ancient Zimbabwe. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Huffman, T. N. (2007a). Leokwe and K2: Ethnic stratification during the Middle Iron Age in southern Africa. Journal of African Archaeology, 5(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
  31. Huffman, T. N. (2007b). A handbook to the Iron Age: The archaeology of pre-colonial farming societies in southern Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  32. Huffman, T. N. (2015a). Social complexity in southern Africa. African Archaeological Review, 32(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huffman, T. N. (2015b). Mapela, Mapungubwe and the origins of States in southern Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 70(201), 15–27.Google Scholar
  34. Huffman, T. N., & Vogel, J. C. (1991). The chronology of Great Zimbabwe. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 46, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes, G. (1997). Excavations within the peripheral area of settlement at Khami, 1989. Zimbabwea, 5, 3-21.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, N., & Kusimba, C. (2008). Pathways to social complexity and political centralization in the southern Zambezian region. African Archaeological Review, 25, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  39. Lane, P. (1994). The use and abuse of ethnography in southern Africa. Azania, 29, 50–56.Google Scholar
  40. Lane, P. (2005). Barbarous tribes and unrewarding gyrations? The changing role of ethnographic imagination in African archaeology. In A. B. Stahl (Ed.), African archaeology: A critical introduction (pp. 24–54). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Lane, P. (2011). Possibilities for a postcolonial archaeology in sub-Saharan Africa: Indigenous and usable pasts. World Archaeology, 43(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  42. Meskell, L. (2011). From Paris to Pontdrift: UNESCO meetings, Mapungubwe and mining. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 66, 149–156.Google Scholar
  43. Mudenge, S. I. (1988). A political history of Munhumutapa c. 1400–1902. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.Google Scholar
  44. Murimbika, M. (2006). Sacred powers and rituals of transformation: An ethnoarchaeological study of rainmaking rituals and agricultural productivity during the evolution of the Mapungubwe state, AD 1000 to AD 1300. PhD Dissertation. University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  45. Pikirayi, I. (2001). The Zimbabwe Culture: Origins and decline of southern Zambezian states. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  46. Pikirayi, I. (2013). Stone architecture and the development of power in the Zimbabwe tradition AD 1270–1830. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 48(2), 282–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prinsloo, L. C., & Colomban, P. (2008). A Raman spectroscopic study of the Mapungubwe oblates: Glass trade beads excavated at an Iron Age archaeological site in South Africa. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 39, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pwiti, G. (1996). Peasants, chiefs and kings: A model of the development of cultural complexity in northern Zimbabwe. Zambezia, 23, 31–52.Google Scholar
  49. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 164–201.Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, K. R. (1959). Khami ruins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Robinson, K. R. (1961). Excavations on the Acropolis Hill. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia, 3(23A), 159–192.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, K. R. (1966). The archaeology of the Rozwi. In E. T. Stokes & R. Brown (Eds.), The Zambesian past: Studies in Central African history (pp. 3–27). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, K. R. (1985). Dated Iron Age sites from the upper Umguza Valley 1982: Their possible implications. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 40, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmidt, P. R. (ed.). (2009). Postcolonial archaeologies in Africa. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  55. Schmidt, P. R. (2014). Rediscovering community archaeology in Africa and reframing its practice. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 1(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schoeman, M.H. (2006). Clouding power? Rain-control, space, landscapes and ideology in Shashe-Limpopo state formation. PhD Dissertation. University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  57. Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shepherd, N. (2002). The politics of archaeology in Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sinamai, A. (2014). An un-inherited past: Preserving the Khami world heritage site, Zimbabwe (No. Doctor of Philosophy). Deakin University.Google Scholar
  60. Sinclair, P. (1984). Some aspects of the economic level of the Zimbabwe state. Zimbabwea, 1, 48–53.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, C., & Jackson, G. (2006). Decolonizing indigenous archaeology: Developments from down under. The American Indian Quarterly, 30(3), 311–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stahl, A. B. (2001). Making history in Banda: Anthropological visions of Africa’s past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stein, G. J. (1998). Heterogeneity, power, and political economy: Some current research issues in the archaeology of Old World complex societies. Journal of Archaeological Research, 6(1), 1–44.Google Scholar
  64. Summers, R. (1971). Ancient ruins and vanished civilisations of southern Africa. Cape Town: T. V. Bulpin.Google Scholar
  65. Summers, R., Robinson, K., & Whitty, A. (1961). Zimbabwe excavations. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia, 3(23A), 15–332.Google Scholar
  66. Thorp, C. R. (1995). Kings, commoners, and cattle at Zimbabwe tradition sites (No. 1). National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
  67. Van Waarden, C. (1998). The Late Iron Age. In P. Lane, A. Reid, & A. Segobye (Eds.), Ditswa Mmung: The archaeology of Botswana (pp. 115–160). Gabarone: Botswana Society.Google Scholar
  68. Van Waarden, C. (2011). The origin of Zimbabwe tradition walling. Zimbabwean Prehistory, 29, 54–77.Google Scholar
  69. Van Waarden, C. (2012). Butua and the end of an era: The effect of the collapse of the Kalanga state on ordinary citizens. An analysis of behaviour under stress. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 47(1), 133–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yoffee, N. (2005). Myth of the archaic state: Evolution of the earliest cities, states, and civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shadreck Chirikure
    • 1
  • Foreman Bandama
    • 1
  • Michelle House
    • 1
  • Abigail Moffett
    • 1
  • Tawanda Mukwende
    • 1
  • Mark Pollard
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Research Laboratory for the History of Art and ArchaeologyOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations