Advertisement

African Archaeological Review

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 339–382 | Cite as

Constructing Community Through Refuse Disposal

  • Diane Gifford-Gonzalez
Original Article

Abstract

Unlike archaeologists working in Europe, Southwest Asia, and North America, Africanists have been slow to explore links between culturally structured, everyday practices, and refuse disposal, remaining inclined to view all “midden” accumulations as undifferentiated deposits. However, African ethnographic cases and archaeological researches elsewhere demonstrate that such accumulations can be highly selective and culturally structured compositions. This paper reviews examples that have shown cultural structure in the disposition of spent items. It then explores African ethnographic and archaeological cases, one from Niger and three from East Africa, in which handling of culinary artifacts and products may reveal links between household and community through habitual acts of refuse placement.

Keywords

Niger Kenya Trash Midden Disposal Structured deposition Zooarchaeology Practice theory 

Résumé

Contrairement aux archéologues travaillant en l‘Europe, l’Asie du Sud-ouest, et en l’Amérique du Nord, les africanistes ont été un peu lents à explorer les liens entre les pratiques quotidiennes structurées culturellement et la deposition des déchets ; ils restent disposés à considérer des accumulations des dépôts comme les depositionsindifférenciés. Neanmoins, plusieurs cas ethnographiques africaines et études archéologiques d’ailleurs démontrent que ces accumulations des dépôts peuvent être sélectives et structurées culturellement. Cet article résume des exemples qui ont montré la structuration culturelle de la disposition des objets usés. Ensuite, il présent des cas africaines, deux ethnoarchéologiques et deux archéologiques, qui proviennent de Niger et de l‘Afrique de l’Est, où le traitement des outils et des produits culinaires peuvent révéler des liens entre les foyers individuels et leurs communautés, dans ses actes habituels de l’emplacement de déchets.

Notes

Acknowledgments

My main debts of gratitude are to the Dassanetch people of the Ileret settlement and the Maasai people of Olorgesailie, who allowed me to pry into their lives for a while. Research in Kenya was conducted with the permission of the Office of the President of the Republic of Kenya and under the sponsorship of the National Museums of Kenya. My research time in Kenya where the data cited in this paper were collected was supported by a grant to my advisor, the late Glynn Ll. Isaac, from the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research and a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant. I am forever grateful to Glynn Isaac and to Richard E. F. Leakey for their encouragement and material support while I was at Lake Turkana, and to the Olorgesailie Prehistoric Monument for providing accommodation while I was in the field in the Kajiado District. Andrew Kilonzo, Jack Kilonzo, Loriano Kesia, and Mzee Kaniugi Ikenywa all helped me conduct fieldwork and facilitated good local relations. I thank the late J. Desmond Clark and Andrew B. Smith for their help and encouragement in working with the fauna from Adrar Bous. Kelley Esh, Jorge Martínez Moreno, Kathryn Twiss, Laura Scheiber, and Elizabeth Agrilla assisted me with data collection used in this study. My review of the history of thinking about middens and trash owes much to an excellent literature review by Martin et al. (2000), published in connection to their own work at Çatalhöyük. I am grateful for their inspiration. I thank Cameron Gokee and Amanda Logan for inviting me to participate in the SAfA session from which this special issue emerged, and for their attentive and critical reading of drafts of this paper, as well as editing the French abstract. I thank the anonymous reviewers for their sharp eyes and very apt queries: these have made this a better paper. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the influence of the late Bill Rathje on my thinking about choice, action, refuse, and archaeology.

References

  1. Agrilla, E., Smith, A., & Galloway, A. (2008). The burials and human skeletal remains of Adrar Bous. In D. Gifford-Gonzalez, J. D. Clark, E. A. A. Garcea, A. B. Smith, & M. A. J. Williams (Eds.), Adrar Bous: Archaeology of a volcanic ring complex in Niger (pp. 369–387). Tervuren: Annales in Archaeology, Royal Africa Museum.Google Scholar
  2. Binford, L. R. (1978a). Organization and formation processes: Looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 35(3), 255–273.Google Scholar
  3. Binford, L. R. (1978b). Dimensional analysis of behavior and site structure: Learning from an Eskimo hunting stand. American Antiquity, 43, 330–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984[1979]). Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brück, J. (1999). Ritual and rationality: Some problems of interpretation in European archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology, 2(3), 313–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, C. J. (1977). Pastoralism in crisis. The Dasanetch and their Ethiopian lands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Childe, V. G. (1929). The Danube in prehistory. Oxford: The Clarendon Pess.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, J. D., Garcea, E. A. A., Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Smith, A. B., & Williams, M. A. J. (Eds., D. Gifford-Gonzalez, General Ed.). (2008). Adrar Bous: Archaeology of a Central Saharan granitic ring complex in Niger. Tervuren: Royal African Museum, Annales in Archaeology.Google Scholar
  10. Deal, M. (1985). Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 4(4), 243–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. de Certeau, M., Giard, L., & Mayol, P. (1998). The practice of everyday life: Living and cooking (T. J. Tomasik, Trans) (Vol. 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. di Lernia, S., Tafuri, M. A., Gallinaro, M., Alhaique, F., Balasse, M., Cavorsi, L., et al. (2013). Inside the “African Cattle Complex”: Animal burials in the Holocene Central Sahara. PloS One, 8(2), e56879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, M. (2002[1966]). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer, a description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  16. Fleisher, J., & Wynne-Jones, S. (2012). Finding meaning in ancient Swahili spatial practices. African Archaeological Review, 29, 171–207.Google Scholar
  17. Gifford, D. P. (1977). Observations of modern human settlements as an aid to archaeological interpretation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Gifford, D. P. (1980). Ethnoarchaeological contributions to the taphonomy of human sites. In A. K. Behrensmeyer & A. P. Hill (Eds.), Fossils in the making: Vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology (pp. 93–106). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gifford, D. P., Isaac, G. L., & Nelson, C. M. (1980). Evidence for predation and pastoralism at Prolonged Drift, a Pastoral Neolithic site in Kenya. Azania, 15, 57–108.Google Scholar
  20. Gifford-Gonzalez, D. (2008). The fauna from Adrar Bous and surrounding areas. In J. D. Clark, E. A. A. Garcea, D. Gifford-Gonzalez, A. B. Smith, & M. A. J. Williams (Eds., D. Gifford-Gonzalez, General Ed.), Adrar Bous: Archaeology of a Central Saharan granitic ring complex in Niger (pp.313-353). Tervuren: Royal African Museum, Annales in Archaeology.Google Scholar
  21. Gifford-Gonzalez, D. (2011). East African pastoralism: Routes, outcomes, questions. “People and Animals in Holocene Africa. Recent Advances in Archaeozoology.” Reports in African Archaeology, 2, 29–44.Google Scholar
  22. Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Damrosch, D. B., Damrosch, D. R., Pryor, J., & Thunen, R. L. (1985). The third dimension in site structure: An experiment in trampling and vertical dispersal. American Antiquity, 50(4), 803–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardy-Smith, T., & Edwards, P. C. (2004). The garbage crisis in prehistory: Artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23(3), 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayden, B., & Cannon, A. (1983). Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2, 117–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayden, B., & Cannon, A. (1984). The structure of material systems: Ethnoarchaeology in the Maya highlands (SAA papers) (Vol. 3). Washington: Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar
  26. Hebdige, D. (1983). Travelling light: One route into material culture. Royal Anthropological Institute News, 59, 11–13.Google Scholar
  27. Hill, J. D. (1996). The identification of ritual deposits of animal bones: A perspective from a specific study of ‘special animal deposits’ from the southern English Iron Age. In S. Anderson & K. Boyle (Eds.), Ritual treatment of human and animal remains: Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Osteoarchaeological Research Group held in Cambridge on 8th October 1994 (pp. 17–32). Oxford: Oxbow Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in action: Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hodder, I. (1987). The meaning of discard: Ash and domestic space in Baringo. In S. Kent (Ed.), Method and theory for activity area research: An ethnoarchaeological approach (pp. 424–448). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hodgson, D. L. (1999). Pastoralism, patriarchy, and history: Changing gender relations among the Maasai of Tanganyika. Journal African History, 40, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joyce, R. (2008). Practice in and as deposition. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work (pp. 25–39). Santa Fé: SAR Press.Google Scholar
  32. Karkanas, P., & Goldberg, P. (2010). Site formation processes at Pinnacle Point Cave 13B (Mossel Bay, Western Cape Province, South Africa): Resolving stratigraphic and depositional complexities with micromorphology. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(3–4), 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kent, S. (1990). Activity areas and architecture: An interdisciplinary view of the relationship between use of space and domestic built environments. In S. Kent (Ed.), Domestic architecture and the use of space (pp. 1–8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kent, S. (1991). The relationship between mobility strategies and site structure. In E. M. Kroll & T. D. Price (Eds.), The interpretation of archaeological spatial patterning (Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology) (pp. 33–59). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kent, S. (1993). Variability in faunal assemblages: The influences of hunting skill, sharing, dogs, and mode of cooking on faunal remain at a sedentary Kalahari community. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 12, 323–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kent, S. (1995). Unstable households in a stable Kalahari community in Botswana. American Anthropologist, 97(2), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kent, S. (1999). The archaeological visibility of storage: Delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity, 64(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lam, Y. M., Chen, X., Marean, C. W., & Frey, C. J. (1998). Bone density and long bone representation in archaeological faunas: Comparing results from CT and photon densitometry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25, 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lane, P. (2005). Barbarous tribes and unrewarding gyrations? The changing role of ethnographic imagination in African archaeology. In A. B. Stahl (Ed.), African archaeology. A critical introduction (pp. 24–54). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Lapham, H. A. (2004). Zooarchaeological evidence for changing socioeconomic status within early historic Native American communities in mid-Atlantic North America. In S. J. O’Day, W. Van Neer, & A. Ervynck (Eds.), Behaviour behind bones: The zooarchaeology of ritual, religion, status and identity (pp. 293–303). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  42. Lightfoot, K. G. (1997). Cultural construction of coastal landscapes. A Middle Holocene perspective from San Francisco Bay. In J. Erlandson & M. Glassow (Eds.), Archaeology of the California coast during the Middle Holocene (Perspectives in California Archaeology) (Vol. 4, pp. 129–141). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  43. Lightfoot, K., Luby, E. M., & Pesnichak, L. (2011). Mounded landscapes of central California. In K. E. Sassaman & D. H. Holly (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer archaeology as historical process (pp. 55–78). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lightfoot, K. G., Martinez, A., & Schiff, A. M. (1998). Daily practice and material culture in pluralistic social settings: An archaeological study of culture change and persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity, 63(2), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luby, E. M., & Gruber, M. F. (1999). The dead must be fed: Symbolic meanings of the shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay area. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 9(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucero, L. J. (2008). Memorializing place among Classic Maya commoneres. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work (pp. 187–205). Santa Fé: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  47. MacEachern, S. (1996). Foreign countries: The development of ethnoarchaeology in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of World Prehistory, 10(3), 243–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marciniak, A. (2005). Placing animals in the Neolithic: Social zooarchaeology of prehistoric farming communities. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, L. M., Russell, N., Uluceviz, M. A., Baysal, A., Bredenberg, J., Cessford, C., et al. (2000). Trashing rubbish. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Towards reflexive methods in archaeology: The example of Çatalhöyük (Vol. BIAA 28, pp. 57–69). Ankara: MacDonald Institute Monographs/British Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  50. Marshall, F. B. (1990). Cattle herds and caprine flocks. In P. T. Robertshaw (Ed.), Early pastoralists of south-western Kenya (pp. 205–260). Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa.Google Scholar
  51. Mayol, P. (1998). Part I: Living (T. J. Tomasik, Trans). In M. de Certeau, L. Gard, & P. Mayol (Eds.), The practice of everyday life: Living and cooking (Vol. 2, pp. 5–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mills, B. J. (2008). Remembering while forgetting: Depositional practices and social memory at Chaco. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices (pp. 81–108). Santa Fé: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mills, B. J., & Walker, W. H. (Eds.). (2008). Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices. Santa Fé: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  54. Moore, H. L. (1982). The interpretation of spatial patterning in settlement residues. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology (pp. 74–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, H. L. (1996). Space, text, and gender: An anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  56. Needham, S., & Spence, T. (1997). Refuse and the formation of middens. Antiquity, 71, 77–90.Google Scholar
  57. O’Connell, J. F. (1987). Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications. American Antiquity, 52, 74–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paris, F. (1992). Chin Tafidet, village néolithique. Journal des Africanistes, 62, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paris, F. (1997). Les inhumations de Bos au Sahara méridional au Néolithique (pp. 113–122). IX: Archaeozoologia.Google Scholar
  60. Paris, F. (2000). African livestock remains from Saharan mortuary contexts. In R. M. Blench & K. C. MacDonald (Eds.), The origins and development of African livestock (Archaeology, genetics, linguistics, and ethnography, pp. 111–126). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  61. Pauketat, T. R. (2008). Founders’ cults and the archaeology of Wa-kan-da. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices (pp. 61–81). Santa Fé: SAR Press.Google Scholar
  62. Pollard, J. (2008). Deposition and material agency in the Early Neolithic of southern Britain. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices (pp. 41–59). Santa Fé: SAR Press.Google Scholar
  63. Rathje, W. L., & Murphy, C. (2001). Rubbish!: The archaeology of garbage. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  64. Richards, C., & Thomas, J. (1984). Ritual activity and structured deposition in Later Neolithic Wessex. In R. Bradley & J. Gardiner (Eds.), Neolithic studies. A review of some current research (Vol. 133, pp. 189–218). Oxford: BAR British Series.Google Scholar
  65. Robertshaw, P. T. (Ed.). (1990). Early pastoralists of south-western Kenya. Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa.Google Scholar
  66. Russell, N., & Martin, L. (2005). Çatalhöyük mammal remains. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 seasons (pp. 33–98, Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 4, BIAA Monograph No. 38). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research and the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
  67. Schiffer, M. B. (1972). Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37, 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schiffer, M. B. (1983). Toward the identification of formation processes. American Antiquity, 48, 675–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schiffer, M. B. (1987). Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  70. Schneider, D. M. (1980). American kinship: A cultural account (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Shipman, P., Foster, G., & Schoeninger, M. (1984). Burnt bones and teeth: An experimental study of colour, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage. Journal of Archaeological Science, 11, 307–325.Google Scholar
  72. Sobania, N. (2011). The formation of ethnic identity in South Omo: The Dassenech. Journal of East African Studies, 5(1), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stahl, A. B. (2002). Colonial entanglements and the practices of taste: An alternative to logocentric approaches. American Anthropologist, 104, 827–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stahl, A. B. (2008). Dogs, pythons, pots, and beads: The dynamics of shrines and sacrificial practices in Banda, Ghana, 1400–1900 CE. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work: Archaeologies of material practices. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research.Google Scholar
  75. Stahl, P. W., & Zeidler, J. A. (1990). Differential bone-refuse accumulation in food-preparation and traffic areas on an early Ecuadorian house floor. Latin American Antiquity, 1(2), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stiner, M. C., Kuhn, S. L., Weiner, S., & Bar-Yosef, O. (1995). Differential burning, recrystallization, and fragmentation of archaeological bone. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tani, M. (1995). Beyond the identification of formation processes: Behavioral inference based on traces left by cultural formation processes. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2(3), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turton, D. (2013). Aiding and abetting: UK and US complicity in Ethiopia’s mass displacement http://thinkafricapress.com/ethiopia/politics-stupid-uk-aid-and-human-rights-abuses-lower-omo-valley. Accessed 18 Nov 2013.
  79. Walker, W. H. (2002). Stratigraphy and practical reason. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walker, W. H. (2008). Practice and nonhuman social actors: The afterlife histories of witches and dogs in the American Southwest. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory work (pp. 137–157). Santa Fé: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  81. Wandsnider, L. (1997). The roasted and the boiled: Food composition and heat treatment with special emphasis on pit-hearth cooking. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 16, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilson, D. C. (1994). Identification and assessment of secondary refuse aggregates. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(1), 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zerboni, A. (2011). Micromorphology reveals in situ Mesolithic living floors and archaeological features in multiphase sites in central Sudan. Geoarchaeology, 26(3), 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California - Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations