Advertisement

African Archaeological Review

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 339–366 | Cite as

New Pathways of Sociopolitical Complexity in Southern Africa

  • Shadreck Chirikure
  • Munyaradzi Manyanga
  • Innocent Pikirayi
  • Mark Pollard
Review Article

Abstract

Much is known about the economy and spatial organization of Zimbabwe culture entities of Mapungubwe, Great Zimbabwe and Khami but less in terms of their origins and relationship with each other. Based on little tangible evidence, it is believed and widely accepted that the societies based at Mapungubwe (ad 1220–1290), Great Zimbabwe (ad 1300–1450) and Khami (ad 1450–1820) rose, developed and eclipsed in tandem. A recent reexamination of the relationship between these settlements and related ones using local ceramics, imported artefacts, stone architecture and Bayesian modelling suggests this may not have been the case. The synthesis proffered revelations which temper the widely accepted assumption that sociopolitical complexity in southern Africa began in the Shashi-Limpopo Valley before anywhere else in the region. Firstly, there are numerous Zhizo and Leopard’s Kopje sites that predate Mapungubwe but contain prestige goods and stone structures dating from the late first millennium ad. Secondly, material culture studies and modelled radiocarbon dates indicate that Great Zimbabwe evolved out of Gumanye while Khami, like Mapungubwe, may have developed out of the Leopard’s Kopje. In fact, Great Zimbabwe was already a place of importance when Mapungubwe collapsed. Thirdly, Khami and Great Zimbabwe overlapped for over a century, before the latter buckled. Therefore, the evolution of sociopolitical complexity in southern Africa may have followed trajectories that are different from what the current understanding implies.

Keywords

Zimbabwe culture Sociopolitical complexity Southern Africa Great Zimbabwe Khami Mapungubwe 

Résumé

Nous savons beaucoup de choses à propos de l’organisation spatiale et de l’économie des entités culturelles Zimbabwéennes de Mapungubwe, Great Zimbabwe et Khami, mais peu sur leurs origines et leurs relations. Selon le peu de données disponibles, Mapungubwe (1220–1290 ap. J-C), Great Zimbabwe (1300–1450 ap. J-C) et Khami (1450–1820 ap. J-C) auraient été fondés, se seraient développés et se seraient effondrés successivement. De récentes recherches ont exploré les relations entre ces différents sites ainsi que ceux qui y sont rattachés, en étudiant les céramiques locales, les objets importés, la typologie des murs de pierres et notamment les préférences résidentielles, et la modélisation Bayesienne. La synthèse permet de tempérer la vision dominante selon laquelle la complexité sociopolitique dans le Sud de l’Afrique a commencé dans la vallée du Shashi-Limpopo, avant tout autre site dans la région. Tout d’abord, il y a de nombreux sites antérieurs à Mapungubwe, Zhizo et Leopard’s Kopje, avec des biens de prestige et des fortifications en pierre datant de la fin du premier millénaire ap. J-C. Ces caractéristiques seraient apparus à K2 et Mapungubwe dans la dépression du Limpopo. Deuxièmement, la culture matérielle et les datations carbones indiquent que Great Zimbabwe était déjà un lieu important quand Mapungubwe s’est effondré. Enfin, Khami et Great Zimbabwe coexistent pendant plus d’un siècle, avant que ce dernier ne tombe en déchéance. Par conséquent, la complexité sociopolitique dans le Sud de l’Afrique a probablement emprunté des trajectoires différentes de celles qui sont actuellement tracées avec les connaissances disponibles.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Bluesky Research Grant: 85892) and the Programme for Enhancement of Research Capacity (PERC) of University of Cape Town Research Office is acknowledged with sincere gratitude. The research at Khami, Mapela and Great Zimbabwe was carried out under a permit from the National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe (NMMZ). We thank Dr. Mahachi, the Executive Director of NMMZ, for his generosity and goodwill. Our thanks also go to Simon Hall, Foreman Bandama, Abigail Moffett and two anonymous reviewers, who provided tremendous comments that enhanced the quality and scope of this paper. Special thanks also go to the editor, Adria LaViolette, for additional insights.

References

  1. Beach, D. N. (1980). The Shona and Zimbabwe 900–1850. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, D. N. (1984). Zimbabwe before 1900. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, D. N. (1994). A Zimbabwean past: Shona dynastic histories and oral traditions. Gweru: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beach, D. N. (1998). Cognitive archaeology and the imaginary history of Great Zimbabwe. Current Anthropology, 39, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach, D., Bourdillon, M. F. C., Denbow, J., Hall, M., Lane, P., Pikirayi, I., et al. (1997). Review feature: Snakes and crocodiles: Power and symbolism in ancient Zimbabwe, by Thomas N. Huffman. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 52(166), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bent, J. T. (1896). The ruined cities of Mashonaland: Being a record of excavation and exploration in 1891. Green: Longmans.Google Scholar
  7. Bhila, H. H. K. (1982). Trade and politics in a Shona kingdom: The Manyika and their African and Portuguese neighbours, 1575–1902. Essex: Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
  8. Bronk Ramsey, C. (1994). Analysis of chronological information and radiocarbon calibration: The program OxCal. Archaeological Computing Newsletter, 41, 11–16.Google Scholar
  9. Bronk Ramsey, C. (1995). Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: The OxCal program. Radiocarbon, 37(2), 425–430.Google Scholar
  10. Bronk Ramsey, C. (2009). Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon, 51(1), 337–360.Google Scholar
  11. Buck, C. E., Kenworthy, J. B., Litton, C. D., & Smith, A. F. M. (1991). Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: A Bayesian approach to calibration. Antiquity, 65, 808–821.Google Scholar
  12. Calabrese, J. A. (2007). The emergence of social and political complexity in the Shashi-Limpopo Valley of Southern Africa, AD 900 to 1300: Ethnicity, class, and polity (Vol. 1617). British Archaeological Reports Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Carneiro, R. L. (1967). On the relationship between size of population and complexity of social organization. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 23(3), 234–243.Google Scholar
  14. Caton-Thompson, G. (1931). The Zimbabwe Culture: Ruins and reactions. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  15. Caton-Thompson, G. (1939). Mapungubwe. I. The excavations and culture. Antiquity, 13(51), 324–341.Google Scholar
  16. Chipunza, K. T. (1994). A diachronic analysis of the architecture of the Hill Complex at Great Zimbabwe. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  17. Chirikure, S., & Pikirayi, I. (2008). Inside and outside the dry stone walls: Revisiting the material culture of Great Zimbabwe. Antiquity, 82, 976–993.Google Scholar
  18. Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., & Pollard, A. M. (2012). When science alone is not enough: Radiocarbon timescales, history, ethnography and elite settlements in southern Africa. Journal of Social Archaeology, 12(3), 356–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chirikure, S., Pikirayi, I., & Pwiti, G. (2001). A comparativer study of Khami pottery Zimbabwe. In G. Pwiti & F. Chami (Eds.), Southern Africa and the Swahili World (pp. 121–135). Dar es Salam: Dar es Salam University Press. Google Scholar
  20. Chirikure, S., Pollard, A. M., Manyanga, M., & Bandama, F. (2013). A Bayesian chronology of Great Zimbabwe: Re-threading the sequence of a vandalized monument. Antiquity, 87(337), 854–872.Google Scholar
  21. Collett, D. P., Vines, A. E., & Hughes, E. G. (1992). The chronology of the Valley Enclosures: Implications for the interpretation of Great Zimbabwe. African Archaeological Review, 10(1), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Connah, G. (1987). African civilisations. Precolonial cities and states in tropical Africa: An archaeological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. DEAT. (2002). Mapungubwe nomination dossier. South Africa: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  24. Denbow, J., Smith, J., Ndobochani, N. M., Atwood, K., & Miller, D. (2008). Archaeological excavations at Bosutswe, Botswana: Cultural chronology, paleo-ecology and economy. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(2), 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fontein, J. (2006). The silence of Great Zimbabwe: Contested landscapes and the power of heritage. Cavendish Pub Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Fouché, L. (1937). Mapungubwe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Galloway, A. (1963). The skeletal remains of Mapungubwe. In L. Fouché (Ed.), Mapungubwe. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner, G. A. (1955). Mapungubwe 1935–1940. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 10(39), 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardner, G. A. (1963). Mapungubwe, Vol. II. Pretoria: J.L. Van Schaik.Google Scholar
  30. Garlake, P. S. (1968). The value of imported ceramics in the dating and interpretation of the Rhodesian Iron Age. Journal of African History, 9(1), 13–33.Google Scholar
  31. Garlake, P. S. (1970). Rhodesian ruins—A preliminary assessment of their styles and chronology. Journal of African History, 11(4), 495–513.Google Scholar
  32. Garlake, P. S. (1973). Great Zimbabwe. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  33. Garlake, P. S. (1978). Pastoralism and Zimbabwe. Journal of African History, 19(4), 479–93.Google Scholar
  34. Garlake, P. S. (1982). Prehistory and ideology in Zimbabwe. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 52(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall, M. (1984). The burden of tribalism: The social context of southern African Iron Age studies. American Antiquity, 49(3), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall, M. (1987). The changing past. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, M. (1990). Hidden history: Iron Age archaeology in Southern Africa. In P. Robertshaw (Ed.), A history of African archaeology (pp. 59–77). London: James Currey.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, M. (2009). New knowledge and the university. Anthropology Southern Africa, 32(1/2), 69–76.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, M., & Vogel, J. C. (1980). Some recent radiocarbon dates from southern Africa. Journal of African History, 21(4), 431–55.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, R. N., & Neal, W. G. (1902). The ancient ruins of Rhodesia. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  41. Huffman, T. N. (1974a). Linguistic affinities of the Iron Age in Rhodesia. Arnoldia, 8(23), 1–12.Google Scholar
  42. Huffman, T. N. (1974b). The Leopard’s Kopje tradition (No. 6). Salisbury: Trustees of the National Museums and Monuments of Rhodesia.Google Scholar
  43. Huffman, T. N. (1978). The origins of Leopard’s Kopje: An 11th century difaquane. Zimbabwe: National Museums and Monuments of Rhodesia.Google Scholar
  44. Huffman, T. N. (1980). Ceramics, classification and Iron Age entities. African Studies, 39(2), 123–174.Google Scholar
  45. Huffman, T. N. (1982). Archaeology and ethnohistory of the African Iron Age. Annual Review of Anthropology, 11, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huffman, T. N. (1996). Snakes and crocodiles: Power and symbolism in ancient Zimbabwe. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Huffman, T. N. (2000). Mapungubwe and the origins of the Zimbabwe Culture. In M. Leslie & T. Maggs (Eds.), African naissance: The Limpopo Valley 1000 years ago (pp. 14–29). South African Archaeological Society: Vlaeberg.Google Scholar
  48. Huffman, T. N. (2007). Handbook to the Iron Age: The archaeology of pre-colonial farming societies in Southern Africa. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  49. Huffman, T. N. (2009). Mapungubwe and Great Zimbabwe: The origin and spread of social complexity in southern Africa. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huffman, T. N., & Vogel, J. C. (1991). The chronology of Great Zimbabwe. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 46, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jaffey, A. J. E. (1966). A reappraisal of the history of the Rhodesian Iron Age up to the fifteenth century. The Journal of African History, 7(2), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Killick, D. (2009). Agency, dependency, and long-distance trade: East Africa and the Islamic world, ca. 7001500 CE. In S. E. Falconer & C. L. Redman (Eds.), Polities and power: Archaeological perspectives on the landscapes of early states (pp. 179–207). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kim, N., & Kusimba, C. (2008). Pathways to social complexity and political centralization in the southern Zambezian region. African Archaeological Review, 25, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kuper, A. (1982). Wives for cattle: Bridewealth and marriage in southern Africa. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  55. Kusimba, C. (2006). Slavery and warfare in African chiefdoms. In E. Arkush & M. Allen (Eds.), The archaeology of warfare: Prehistories of raiding and conquest (pp. 214–249). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  56. Lane, P. J. (1994). The use and abuse of ethnography in the study of the southern African Iron Age. Azania, 29/30, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lane, P. J. (2005). Barbarous tribes and unrewarding gyrations? The changing role of ethnographic imagination. In A. B. Stahl (Ed.), African archaeology. A critical introduction (pp. 24–54). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Lane, P. (2011). Possibilities for a postcolonial archaeology in sub-Saharan Africa: Indigenous and usable pasts. World Archaeology, 43(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacIver, D. (1906). Medieval Rhodesia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Manyanga, M. (2001). Choices and constraints: Animal resource exploitation in southeastern Zimbabwe. Uppsala: Societa Archaeologica Uppsaliensis.Google Scholar
  61. Manyanga, M., Pikirayi, I., & Ndoro, W. (2000). Coping with dryland environments: Preliminary results from Mapungubwe and Zimbabwe phase sites in the Mateke Hills, south-eastern Zimbabwe. South African Archaeological Society, Goodwin Series, 8, 69–77.Google Scholar
  62. McCormac, F. G., Hogg, A. G., Blackwell, P. G., Buck, C. E., Higham, T. F. G., & Reimer, P. J. (2004). SHCAL04 Southern hemisphere calibration, 0–11.0 cal Kyr BP. Radiocarbon, 46, 1087–1092.Google Scholar
  63. McIntosh, S. K. (Ed.). (1999). Beyond chiefdoms: Pathways to complexity in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Meyer, A. (1998). The archaeological sites of Greefswald. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
  65. Mudenge, S. I. (1988). A political history of Munhumutapa c 1400–1902. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.Google Scholar
  66. Pikirayi, I. (1993). The archaeological identity of the Mutapa state: Towards an historical archaeology of northern Zimbabwe. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  67. Pikirayi, I. (2001). The Zimbabwe Culture: Origins and decline of southern Zambezian states. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  68. Prinsloo, L. C., & Colomban, P. (2008). A Raman spectroscopic study of the Mapungubwe oblates: Glass trade beads excavated at an Iron Age archaeological site in South Africa. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 39(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prinsloo, L. C., Tournié, A., & Colomban, P. (2011). A Raman spectroscopic study of glass trade beads excavated at Mapungubwe Hill and K2, two archaeological sites in southern Africa, raises questions about the last occupation date of the hill. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 3264–3277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pwiti, G. (1991). Trade and economies in southern Africa: The archaeological evidence. Zambezia, 18(2), 119–129.Google Scholar
  71. Pwiti, G. (1996). Peasants, chiefs and kings: A model of the development of cultural complexity in northern Zimbabwe. Zambezia, 23, 31–52.Google Scholar
  72. Renfrew, C., & Cherry, J. (1986) Peer polity interaction and socio-political change. In R. Preucel & I. Hodder (Eds.), Contemporary archaeology in theory: A reader (pp. 114–142). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  73. Robertshaw, P., Wood, M., Melchiorre, E., Popelka-Filcoff, R., & Glascock, M. D. (2010). Southern African glass beads: Chemistry, glass sources and patterns of trade. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 1898–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Robinson, K. R. (1959). Khami ruins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Robinson, K. (1961a). Excavations on the Acropolis Hill. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia, 3(23A), 159–192.Google Scholar
  76. Robinson, K. (1961b). Zimbabwe pottery. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia, 3(23A), 193–226.Google Scholar
  77. Robinson, K. (1961c). Zimbabwe beads. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia, 3(23A), 227–229.Google Scholar
  78. Robinson, K. R. (1965). The Leopard’s Kopje culture: A preliminary report on recent work. Arnoldia, 25, 1–7.Google Scholar
  79. Robinson, K. R. (1985). Dated Iron Age sites from the upper Umguza Valley 1982: Their possible implications. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 40(141), 17–38.Google Scholar
  80. Schmidt, P. R. (Ed.). (2009). Postcolonial archaeologies in Africa. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research.Google Scholar
  81. Schofield, J. F. (1937). The pottery of the Mapungubwe district. In L. Fouché (Ed.), Mapungubwe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Sinclair, P. J. J. (1987). Space, time and social formation: A territorial approach to the archaeology and anthropology of Zimbabwe and Mozambique c 0–1700 AD. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  83. Soper, R. (1990). Great Zimbabwe tradition in local context. In P. Sinclair & G. Pwiti (Eds.), Urban origins in Eastern Africa: Proceedings of the 1990 Workshop, Harare and Great Zimbabwe. Stockholm: Central Board on Antiquities.Google Scholar
  84. Summers, R. (1965). Zimbabwe: A Rhodesian mystery. Johannesburg: Nelson.Google Scholar
  85. Summers, R. (1969). Ancient mining in Rhodesia and adjacent areas. Salisbury: Trustees of the National Museums of Rhodesia.Google Scholar
  86. Summers, R., & Whitty, A. (1961). The development of the Great Enclosure. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Southern Rhodesia, 3(23A), 306–325.Google Scholar
  87. Summers, R., Robinson, K., & Whitty, A. (1961). Zimbabwe excavations. Occasional Papers of the National Museums of Rhodesia, 3(23A), 15–332.Google Scholar
  88. van Riet Lowe, C. (1936). Mapungubwe. First report on excavations in the northern Transvaal. Antiquity, 10(39), 282–291.Google Scholar
  89. Wood, M. (2011). A glass bead sequence for southern Africa from the 8th to the 16th century AD. Journal of African Archaeology, 9(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wood, M. (2012). Interconnections: Glass beads and trade in southern and eastern Africa and the Indian Ocean-7th to 16th centuries AD. Uppsala: Studies in Global Archaeology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shadreck Chirikure
    • 1
  • Munyaradzi Manyanga
    • 1
  • Innocent Pikirayi
    • 2
  • Mark Pollard
    • 3
  1. 1.Cape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Oxford UniversityOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations