Advertisement

African Archaeological Review

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 221–224 | Cite as

Jane Lydon and Uzma Z. Rizvi (eds.), Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology (World Archaeological Congress Research Handbooks in Archaeology, Volume 3); Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, 2010, 525 pp. ISBN 978-1-59874-182-7

  • Jonathan R. WalzEmail author
Book Review
  • 198 Downloads

This volume, which successfully aspires to be multiperspectival and global, draws together a balance of compelling cases to address the postcolonial critique and archaeology. Five themes and 38 chapters—really, succinct vignettes—articulate skillfully the primary framings, approaches, and outcomes of “postcolonial archaeology” on the six inhabited continents. Africa receives attention in the text, including chapters that emphasize case studies influential to arguments relevant to other world regions or to broad themes of postcolonial practice. The Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology (2010) consistently integrates Africa and its people and pasts, a positive trend in world archaeology.

The editors of the handbook—Jane Lydon and Uzma Rizvi—lead off the volume with a concise and useful introduction to the postcolonial critique and its application in archaeology. They parse the volume into five sections, each comprised of a topical summary, case studies from different areas of the globe,...

References

  1. Andah, B. (1995). Studying African societies in cultural context. In P. Schmidt & T. Patterson (Eds.), Making alternative histories: The practice of archaeology and history in non-western settings (pp. 149–182). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  2. Croucher, S., & Weiss, L. (2011). The archaeology of capitalism in colonial contexts, an introduction: Provincializing historical archaeology. In S. Croucher & L. Weiss (Eds.), The archaeology of capitalism in colonial contexts: Postcolonial historical archaeologies (pp. 1–38). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fontein, J. (2006). The silence of Great Zimbabwe: Contested landscapes and the power of heritage. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  5. Liebmann, M. (2008). Introduction: The intersections of archaeology and postcolonial studies. In M. Liebmann & U. Rizvi (Eds.), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique (pp. 1–20). Lanham: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  6. Kus, S. (1997). Archaeologists as anthropologists: Much ado about something after all? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 4, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ndoro, W. (2001). Your monument, our shrine: The preservation of Great Zimbabwe. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  8. Schmidt, P. (2009). What is postcolonial about archaeologies in Africa? In P. Schmidt (Ed.), Postcolonial archaeologies in Africa (pp. 1–20). Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rollins CollegeWinter ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations