Abstract
Laster et al. (Q J Econ 114(1):293–318, 1999) built an economic model in which forecasters have incentives to generate forecasts that differ form the consensus. It is shown that the dispersion of the equilibrium distribution of forecasters, depends on the relative importance given on the intensive forecast users’ loss versus the publicity gain from occasional users. These results depend heavily on the assumption of symmetry for the loss and density functions. In this paper we examine the effects of generalising loss preferences and probability densities to allow for asymmetries through the LinEx loss and the Skewed Normal density, respectively. We derive the generalised equilibrium distribution of forecasts which contains the results of Laster et al. as a special case. The presence of asymmetric preferences is shown to cause a movement of the distribution away from the conditional mean, towards the optimal forecast under loss asymmetry. Furthermore, forecasts now tend to cluster around this quantity in an asymmetric way. These effects tend to be further strengthened or partially offset by the presence of skewness in the distribution of data, a result consistent with the conclusions of Christodoulakis (Finan Res Lett 2:227–233, 2005).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold B.C., Lin G.D. (2004) Characterizations of the skew-normal and the generalized chi distributions. Sankhyã: Indian J Stat 66(4): 593–606
Basu S., Markov S. (2004) Loss function assumptions in rational expectations tests on financial analysts’ earnings forecasts. J Account Econ 38, 171–203
Christodoulakis G.A. (2005) Financial forecasts in the presence of asymmetric loss aversion, skewness and excess kurtosis. Finan Res Lett 2, 227–233
Christoffersen P.F., Diebold F. (1997) Optimal prediction under asymmetric loss. Econ Theory 13, 808–817
Clatworthy, M., Peel, D., Pope, P. Are analysts’ loss functions asymmetric? Working Paper 2006/05, Lancaster University Management School, UK (2006)
Dolado, J.J., Maria-Dolores, R., Ruge-Murcia, F.J. Nonlinear monetary policy rules: some evidence for the US. Working Paper, CEPR, London (2003)
Dolado J.J., Maria-Dolores R., Naveira M. (2005) Are monetary policy reaction functions asymmetric? The role of non-linearity in the Phillips curve. Eur Econ Rev 49(2): 485–503
Granger C.W.J. (1969) Prediction with a generalized cost of error function. Operat Res Q 20, 199–207
Gu Z., Wu J.S. (2003) Earnings skewness and analyst forecast bias. J account Econ 35, 2–29
Laster D., Bennett P., Geoum I.S. (1999) Rational bias in macroeconomic forecasts. Q J Econ 114(1): 293–318
Nobay A.R., Peel D. (2003) Optimal discretionary monetary policy in a model of asymmetric central bank preferences. Econ J 113, 657–665
O’Hagan A., Leonard T. (1976) Bayes estimation subject to uncertainty about parameter constraints. Biometrika 63, 201–203
Ruge-Murcia F. (2004) The inflation bias when the central banker targets the natural rate of unemployment. Eur Econ Rev 48, 91–107
Varian, H. A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. In: Feinberg, S.E., Zellner, A. (eds.) Studies in Bayesian economics in honour of L.J. Savage, pp. 195–208. Amsterdam: North-Holland (1974)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author is grateful to an anonymous referee for helpful comments that have improved the paper. The views expressed in the paper are those of the author and should in no part be attributed to the Bank of Greece.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christodoulakis, G.A. Generalised Rational Bias in Financial Forecasts. Annals of Finance 2, 397–405 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-006-0043-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-006-0043-1