Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 609–613 | Cite as

The Incidence of Occult Nipple-Areola Complex Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving a Skin-Sparing Mastectomy

  • Christine Laronga
  • Bonnie Kemp
  • Dennis Johnston
  • Geoffrey L. Robb
  • S. Eva Singletary
Original Article

Abstract

Background: Surgical treatment of breast cancer traditionally has included resection of the nipple-areola complex (NAC), in the belief that this area had a significant probability of containing occult tumors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the true incidence of NAC involvement in patients who underwent a skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and to determine associated risk factors.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 326 patients who had a SSM at our institution from 1990 to 1993. NAC involvement was reviewed in 286 mastectomy specimens. The charts were analyzed for tumor size, site, histology, grade, nodal status, recurrence, survival, and NAC involvement.

Results: Occult tumor involvement in the NAC was found in 5.6% of mastectomy specimens (16 patients). Four patients would have had NAC involvement identified on frozen section if they had been undergoing a skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the NAC. There were no significant differences between NAC-positive (NAC+) and NAC-negative (NAC-) patients in median tumor size, nuclear grade, histologic subtype of the primary tumor, or receptor status. There were significant differences in location of the primary tumor (subareolar or multicentric vs. peripheral) and positive axillary lymph node status. NAC involvement was not a marker for increased recurrence or decreased survival.

Conclusions: Occult NAC involvement occurred in only a small percentage of patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomies. NAC preservation would be appropriate in axillary node-negative patients with small, solitary tumors located on the periphery of the breast.

Key Words

Occult nipple involvement Skin-sparing mastectomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Balch CM, Singletary SE, Bland KI. Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer. Ann Surg 1993;217:207–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, Richards V, Alpert BS. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg 1979;138:135–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher ER, Gregorio RM, Fisher B, Redmond C, Vellios F, Sommers SC. The pathology of invasive breast cancer. Cancer 1975; 36:1–85.APubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wertheim U, Ozello L. Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1980;4:543–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;143:546–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parry RG, Cochran TC, Wolfort FG. When is there nipple involvement in carcinoma of the breast? Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59:535–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, Grassigli A, Giosa F, Marrano D, Martinelli G. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 989;158:399–403.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suehiro S, Inai K, Tokuoka S, Hamada Y, Toi M, Niimoto M, Hattori T. Involvement of the nipple in early carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;168:244–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mormoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, Umemoto A, Yamamoto H, Harada K, Inoue K. Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer 1985;55:2459–63.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laronga C, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The feasibility of nippleareola skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly 1998;19(2):125–127.CGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilliland MD, Barton RM, Copeland EM. The implications of local recurrence of breast cancer as the first site of therapeutic failure. Ann Surg 1983;197:284–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lossing C, Brongo S, Holmstrom H. Nipple reconstruction with a modified S-flap technique. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1998;32:275–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanabe HY, Tai Y, Kiyokawa K, Yamauchi T. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;199:431–8.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spear SL, Arias J. Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35:232–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Laronga
    • 1
  • Bonnie Kemp
    • 2
  • Dennis Johnston
    • 3
  • Geoffrey L. Robb
    • 4
  • S. Eva Singletary
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston
  2. 2.Department of PathologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston
  3. 3.Department of BiomathematicsThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston
  4. 4.Department of Plastic SurgeryThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston
  5. 5.Dept. of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston

Personalised recommendations