Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 138–144 | Cite as

Breast Cancer After Augmentation Mammoplasty

  • Kristin A. Skinner
  • Howard Silberman
  • William Dougherty
  • Parvis Gamagami
  • James Waisman
  • Richard Sposto
  • Melvin J. Silverstein
Original Articles

Abstract

Background:It is thought that implants interfere with breast cancer diagnosis and that cancers in women who have had breast augmentation carry a worse prognosis.

Methods:A prospective breast cancer database was reviewed, comparing augmented and nonaugmented patients for details of histology, palpability, tumor size, nodal status, mammographic status, receptor status, nuclear grade, stage, and outcome.

Results:Ninety-nine cancers in augmented women and 2857 cancers in nonaugmented women were identified. Among these women, mammography was normal in 43% of those who had had augmentation and in 5% of those who had not. Augmented women were more likely to have palpable cancers (83% vs. 59%) and nodal involvement (48% vs. 36%), and less likely to have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (18% vs. 28%). When comparing only women younger than 50, the differences in invasiveness and nodal status lost significance. Cancers diagnosed in the 1990s were more likely to be nonpalpable and noninvasive than those diagnosed in the 1980s. This trend was more pronounced in the augmented population.

Conclusions:Augmented patients were more likely to have palpable cancers, although the overall stage and outcome were similar to those of nonaugmented women. Although there have been significant improvements in our ability to diagnose early breast cancer over the past two decades, mammography continues to be suboptimal in augmented women.

Key Words

Breast cancer Augmentation Mammoplasty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Berkel H, Birdsell DC, Jenkins H. Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1982; 326: 1649–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bryant H, Brasher P. Breast implants and breast cancer- reanalysis of a linkage study. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1535–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kern KA, Flannery JT, Kuehn PG. Carcinogenic potential of silicone breast implants: a Connecticut statewide study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 737–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deapen DM, Pike MC, Casagrande JT, Brody GS. The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammoplasty: an epidemiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77: 361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deapen DM, Bernstein L, Brody GS. Are breast implants anticarcinogenic? A 14-year follow-up of the Los Angeles study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1346–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50: 7–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liebman A, Kruse B. Breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings after augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology 1990; 174: 195–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, et al. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women following augmentation with silicone gel-filled prostheses. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28: 635–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schirber S, Thomas WO, Finley JM, et al. Breast cancer after mammary augmentation. South Med J 1993; 86: 263–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carlson GW, Curley SA, Martin JE, et al. The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 837–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark CPIII, Peters GN, O’Brien KM. Cancer in the augmented breast. Cancer 1993; 72: 2170–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cahan AC, Ashikari R, Pressman P, et al. Breast cancer after breast augmentation with silicone implants. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2: 121–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birdsell DC, Jenkins H, Berkel H. Breast cancer diagnosis and survival in women with and without breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 795–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fajardo LL, Harvey JA, McAleese KA, et al. Breast cancer diagnosis in women with sub-glandular silicone gel-filled augmentation implants. Radiology 1995; 194: 859–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    HayesHJr, Vandergrift J, Diner W. Mammography and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eklund G, Busby R, Miller S, Job J. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 469–73.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, et al. Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86: 1126–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grace GT, Roberts C, Cohen IK. The role of mammography in detecting breast cancer in augmented breasts. Ann Plast Surg 1990; 25: 119–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liebman AJ, Kruse BD. Imaging of breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 30: 111–15.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dixon W, Massey F. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clayton D, Hills M. Statistical Models in Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kalbfleisch J, Prentice R. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dodd G. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: An Overview. Cancer 1992; 69(7 Suppl): 1885–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leitch A, Dodd GD, Constanza M, Linver M, Pressman P, McGinnis L, Smith RA. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 150–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin A. Skinner
    • 1
    • 5
  • Howard Silberman
    • 1
  • William Dougherty
    • 1
  • Parvis Gamagami
    • 4
  • James Waisman
    • 2
  • Richard Sposto
    • 3
  • Melvin J. Silverstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKeck School of Medicine University of Southern California, and the Van Nuys Breast CenterLos Angeles
  2. 2.Department of MedicineKeck School of Medicine University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  3. 3.Department of Preventive MedicineKeck School of Medicine University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  4. 4.Department of Preventive MedicineThe Van Nuys Breast CenterLos Angeles
  5. 5.Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations