Advertisement

Social networks and social activities promote cognitive functioning in both concurrent and prospective time: evidence from the SHARE survey

  • Silvana Miceli
  • Laura Maniscalco
  • Domenica Matranga
Original Investigation

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the role of social activities, social networks as well as socioeconomic status (SES) in influencing some aspects of cognitive functioning (immediate and delayed verbal recall tests and semantic verbal fluency) in elderly people over time. This analysis was conducted on a sample of 31,954 healthy elderly people (58% female, mean age 65.54 ± 9.74) interviewed in both the fourth and sixth waves of the Survey on Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), in 2011 and 2015. A structural equation model with measurement component was used to assess the relationship between cognitive function, social life and SES over time. Multilevel ordinal logistic regression was applied to explain satisfaction with social network in relation to different types of social network across countries. Being equipped with good cognitive skills did not seem to be predictive of their maintenance over time (latent coefficient = 0.24, p value = 0.34). On the contrary, the subject’s social and participatory life, understood as satisfying one’s social network and engaging in diversified non-professional social activities, seemed to play a crucial role in the maintenance of cognitive functions in the elderly (latent coefficient = 3.5, p value = 0.03). This research suggests that a socially active and participatory lifestyle mitigates the effects of the physiological process of brain aging.

Keywords

Health Cognitive function Active aging Social activities Social network Family SHARE survey Structural equation model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper uses data from release 6 of SHARE 2011 and SHARE 2015. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th Framework Programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life). Additional funding came from the US National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064). Data collection in Austria (through the Austrian Science Foundation, FWF), Belgium (through the Belgian Science Policy Office) and Switzerland (through BBW/OFES/UFES) was nationally funded. The SHARE data collection in Israel was funded by the US National Institute on Aging (R21 AG025169), by the German–Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF), and by the National Insurance Institute of Israel. Further support by the European Commission through the 6th Framework Programme (Projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, and COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857) is gratefully acknowledged. For methodological details see [Börsch-Supan, A. and H. Jürges (Eds.) (2005). The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe—Methodology. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA)].

Supplementary material

10433_2018_486_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Aartsen MJ, Smits CHM, Van Tilburg T, Knipscheer KCPM, Deeg DJH (2002) Activity in older adults: cause or consequence of cognitive functioning? A longitudinal study on everyday activities and cognitive performance in older adults. J Gerontol 57:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam S, Bonsang E, Grotz C, Perelman S (2013) Occupational activity and cognitive reserve: implications in terms of prevention of cognitive aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Interv Aging 8:377–39Google Scholar
  3. Allin S, Masseria C, Mossialos E (2009) Measuring socioeconomic differences in use of health care services by wealth versus by income. Am J Public Health 99(10):1849–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez-Galvez J (2016) Discovering complex interrelationships between socioeconomic status and health in Europe: a case study applying Bayesian networks. Soc Sci Res 56:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andel R, Silverstein M, Kareholt I (2015) The role of midlife occupational complexity and leisure activity in late-life cognition. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 70:314–3218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrew MK, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K (2008) Social vulnerability, frailty and mortality in elderly people. PLoS ONE 3(5):e2232.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes LL, Mendes de Leon CF, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Evans DA (2004) Social resources and cognitive decline in a population of older African Americans and whites. Neurology 63:2322–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Béland F, Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado B, Otero A, del Ser T (2005) Trajectories of Cognitive Decline and Social Relations. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 60:320–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE (2000) From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med 51:843–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bono F, Matranga D (2018) Socioeconomic inequality in non-communicable diseases in Europe between 2004 and 2015: evidence from the SHARE survey. Eur J Public Health.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky165 Google Scholar
  11. Boots EA, Schultz SA, Almeida RP, Oh JM, Koscik RL, Dowling MN, Gallagher CL, Carlsson CM, Rowley HA, Bendlin BB, Asthana S, Sager MA, Hermann BP, Johnson SC, Okonkwo OC (2015) Occupational complexity and cognitive reserve in a middle-aged cohort at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 30:634–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borrat-Besson C, Ryser V.-A, Gonçalves J (2015) An evaluation of the CASP-12 scale used in the Survey of Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to measure Quality of Life among people aged 50 + . FORS Working Paper Series, paper 2015-4. Lausanne: FORSGoogle Scholar
  13. Börsch-Supan A, Brandt M, Hunkler C, Kneip T, Korbmacher J, Malter F, Schaan B, Stuck S, Zuber S (2013) SHARE central coordination team. data resource profile: the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int J Epidemiol 42:992–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourassa KJ, Memel M, Woolverton C, Sbarra D (2017) Social participation predicts cognitive functioning in aging adults over time: comparisons with physical health, depression, and physical activity. Aging Ment Health 21:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowling A, Farquhar M, Browne P (1991) Use of services in old-age: data from 3 surveys of elderly people. Soc Sci Med 33:689–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown WM, Concedine NS, Magai C (2005) Altruism relates to health in an ethnically diverse sample of older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 60:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown CL, Robitaille A, Zelinski EM, Dixon RA, Hofer SM, Piccinin AM (2016) Cognitive activity mediates the association between social activity and cognitive performance: a longitudinal study. Psychol Aging 31:831–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC (2009) Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 13:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carstensen LL (1992) Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol Aging 7:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan Y, Lee RP (2006) Network size, social support and happiness in later life: a comparative study of Beijing and Hong Kong. J Happiness Stud 7:87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colcombe S, Kramer AF (2003) Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci 14:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Croezen S, Avendano M, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ (2015) Social participation and depression in old age: a fixed-effects analysis in 10 European countries. Am J Epidemiol 182:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Luca G, Celidoni M, Trevisan E (2015) Item nonresponse and imputation strategies in SHARE wave 5. In: Malter F, Börsch-Supan A (eds) SHARE Wave 5: innovations & methodology, max planck institute for social law and social policy. MEA, MunichGoogle Scholar
  24. Dominguez S, Arford T (2010) It is all about who you know: social capital and health in low-income communities. Health Sociol Rev 19:114–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eikemo TA, Bambra C, Judge K, Ringdal K (2008) Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 66(11):2281–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eriksson BG, Hessler RM, Sundh J, Steen B (1999) Cross-cultural analysis of longevity among Swedish and American elders: the role of social networks in the Gothenburg and Missouri longitudinal studies compared. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 28:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fillit HM, Butler RN, O’Connell AW et al (2002) Achieving and maintaining cognitive vitality with aging. Mayo Clin Proc 77:681–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fiori KL, Antonucci TC, Cortina KS (2006) Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fu C, Li Z, Mao Z (2018) Association between social activities and cognitive function among the elderly in China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garcia EL, Banegas JR, Perez-Regadera AG, Cabrera RH, Rodriguez-Artalejo F (2005) Social network and health-related quality of life in older adults: a population-based study in Spain. Qual Life Res 14:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gow AJ, Pattie A, Whiteman MC, Whalley LJ, Deary IJ (2007) Social support and successful aging: investigating the relationships between lifetime cognitive change and life satisfaction. J Individ Differ 28:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Green AF, Rebok G, Lyketsos CG (2008) Influence of social network characteristics on cognition and functional status with aging. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 23:972–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Groot W, van Den Brink HM, van Praag B (2007) The compensating income variation of social capital. Soc Indic Res 82:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haugrud N, Crossley M, Vrbancic M (2011) Clustering and switching strategies during verbal fluency performance differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and healthy aging. J Soc Particip Cognit. Int Neuropsychol Soc 17(6):1153–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Henry JD, Crawford JR (2004) A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychology 18(2):284–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS (2008) Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 9:1–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hultsch DF, Hertzog C, Small BJ, Dixon RA (1999) Use it or lose it: engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging? Psychol Aging 14:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hyde M, Wiggins R, Higgs P, Blane D (2003) A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of needs satisfaction model. Aging Ment Health 7(3):186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. James BDR, Wilson S, Barnes LL, Bennett DA (2011) Late-life social activity and cognitive decline in old age. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 17(6):998–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jefferson AL, Gibbons LE, Rentz DM, Carvalho JO, Manly J, Bennett DA, Jones RN (2011) A life course model of cognitive activities, socioeconomic status, education, reading ability, and cognition. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(8):1403–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kelly ME, Duff H, Kelly S, McHugh Power JE, Brennan S, Lawlor BA, Loughrey DG (2017) The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev 6(1):259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. La Rue A (2010) Healthy brain aging: role of cognitive reserve, cognitive stimulation, and cognitive exercises. Clin Geriatr Med 26(1):99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laws KR, Duncan A, Gale TM (2010) Normal semantic-phonemic fluency discrepancy in Alzheimer’s disease? A meta-analytic study. Cortex 46(5):595–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Le Carret N, Lafont S, Letenneur L, Dartigues F, Mayo W, Fabrigoule C (2003) The effect of education on cognitive performances and its implication for the constitution of the cognitive reserve. Dev Neuropsychol. 23:317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindström M, Moghaddassi M, Merlo J (2004) Individual self-reported health, social participation and neighbourhood: a multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. Prev Med 39:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Litwin H (2004) Social networks, ethnicity and public home-care utilisation. Ageing Soc 24:921–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Litwin H, Stoeckel KJ (2013) Social networks and subjective wellbeing among older Europeans: Does age make a difference? Ageing Soc 33:1263–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Litwin H, Stoeckel KJ (2015) Social network, activity participation, and cognition. A Complex Relationsh. Res Aging 38:76–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matranga D, Tabacchi G, Cangialosi D (2018) Sedentariness and weight status related to SES and family characteristics in Italian adults: exploring geographic variability through multilevel models. Scand J Public Health 46(5): 548–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McGue M, Christensen K (2007) Social activity and healthy aging: a study of aging Danish twins”. Twin Res Hum Genet 10:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McLaughlin D, Vagenas D, Pachana NA, Begum N, Dobson A (2010) Gender differences in social network size and satisfaction in adults in their 70s. J Health Psychol 15:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miceli S, Gangemi A (2011) Psicologia dell’intelligenza. Laterza, BariGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller LMS, Lachman ME (2000) Cognitive performance and the role of control beliefs in midlife. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 7:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Misuraca R, Miceli S, Teuscher U (2017) Three effective ways to nurture our brain physical activity, healthy nutrition, and music. A Review. Eur Psychol 22(2):101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Park HL, O’Connell JE, Thomson RG (2003) A systematic review of cognitive decline in the general elderly population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(12):1121–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2000) Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 15(2):187–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42(1):185–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rafnsson SB, Shankar A, Steptoe A (2015) Longitudinal influences of social network characteristics on subjective well-being of older adults: findings from the ELSA study. J Aging Health 27(5):919–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seeman TE, Lusignolo TM, Albert M, Berkman L (2001) Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: macArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychol 20:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singh-Manoux A, Marmot MG, Glymour M, Sabia S, Kivimäki M, Dugravot A (2011) Does cognitive reserve shape cognitive decline? Ann Neurol 70(2):296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smart EL, Gow AJ, Deary I (2014) Occupational complexity and lifetime cognitive abilities. Neurology 9(83):2285–2291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stern Y (2003) The concept of cognitive reserve: a catalyst for research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 25:589–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stern Y (2007) Cognitive reserve: theory and application. Taylor & Francis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  65. Stern Y (2009) Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia 47:2015–2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tilvis RS, Kähönen-Väre MH, Jolkkonen J, Valvanne J, Pitkala KH, Strandberg TE (2004) Predictors of cognitive decline and mortality of aged people over a 10-year period. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tomini F, Tomini S, Groot W (2016) Understanding the value of social networks in life satisfaction of elderly people: a comparative study of 16 European countries using SHARE data. BMC Geriatr 16(1):203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tsimbos C (2010) An assessment of socio-economic inequalities in health among elderly in Greece, Italy and Spain. Int J Public Health 55:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Horst M, Coffé H (2012) How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being. Soc Ind Res 107(3):509–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vásquez-Amézquita M (2016) Factores predictores de la reserva cognitiva en un grupo de adultos mayores. Predictors of cognitive reserve in a group of elderly. Rev Chil Neuropsicol 11(1):5–11Google Scholar
  71. Vozikaki M, Linardakis M, Micheli K, Philalithis A (2017) Activity Participation and Well-Being Among European Adults Aged 65 years and Older. Soc Ind Res 131(2):769–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wheaton B, Muthen B, Alwin DF, Summers G (1977) Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol Methodol 8(1):84–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson RS, Scherr PA, Schneider JA, Tang Y, Bennett DA (2007) Relation of cognitive activity to risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Neurology 69(20):1911–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang Z, Gu D, Hayward MD (2008) Early life influences on cognitive impairment among oldest old Chinese. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 63:S25–S33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological, Pedagogical, and Educational SciencesUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental SciencesUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother and Child Care “G. D’Alessandro”University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations