European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 335–347 | Cite as

Childhood conditions and current physical performance among non-institutionalized individuals aged 50+ in Israel

  • Galit Weinstein
Original Investigation


Adverse socioeconomic conditions in childhood have been previously linked with high risk of various health conditions. However, the association with future physical function has been less studied. Hand grip strength and chair-rising time are objective measures of physical capability indicating current and future health outcomes. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that perceived socio-economic status in childhood is related to current measures of physical function, among Israeli participants of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe project. The study included 2300 participants aged 50 years or older (mean age 68 ± 10; 56 % women). Generalized linear regression models were used to examine the associations of childhood wealth and number of books in residence with grip strength and time to complete five rises from a chair. Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationships between the early life conditions and the ability to perform the physical tests. Adjustment was made for current income or household wealth, and for demographic, anthropometric, health, and life-style measures. Being wealthy and having a large number of books at home in childhood was associated with a stronger hand grip and a better chair-rise test performance. These associations were more robust in women compared to men, and persisted after adjustment for potential covariates. In addition, childhood wealth and number of books were associated with lower risk of being unable to perform the tests. Thus, early-life programming may contribute to physical function indicators in mid- and late-life.


Hand grip strength Chair stand test Socio-economic status Body stature Frailty 


  1. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, Syme SL (1994) Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol 49:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Snih S, Kaushik V, Eschbach K, Markides K (2008) Ethnic differences in physical performance in older Americans: data from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (1988–1994). Aging Clin Exp Res 20:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen-Ranberg K, Petersen I, Frederiksen H, Mackenbach JP, Christensen K (2009) Cross-national differences in grip strength among 50+ year-old Europeans: results from the SHARE study. Eur J Ageing 6:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnau A, Espaulella J, Mendez T, Serrarols M, Canudas J, Formiga F, Ferrer M (2015) Lower limb function and 10-year survival in population aged 75 years and older. Fam Pract. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv088 Google Scholar
  5. Bateson P et al (2004) Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature 430:419–421. doi: 10.1038/nature02725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D (2002) A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol 31:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birnie K et al (2011) Childhood socioeconomic position and objectively measured physical capability levels in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 6:e15564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borsch-Supan A et al (2013) Data resource profile: the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int J Epidemiol. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt088 Google Scholar
  9. Bowen ME, Gonzalez HM (2010) Childhood socioeconomic position and disability in later life: results of the health and retirement study. Am J Public Health 100(Suppl 1):S197–S203. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleland J (2010) The benefits of educating women. Lancet 376:933–934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61417-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper R et al (2011a) Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review. Age Ageing 40:14–23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R, Mortality Review Group, FALCon and HALCyon Study Teams (2010) Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c4467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper R, Mishra GD, Kuh D (2011b) Physical activity across adulthood and physical performance in midlife: findings from a British birth cohort. Am J Prev Med 41:376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dannefer D (2003) Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 58:S327–S337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Boo HA, Harding JE (2006) The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46:4–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00506.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. den Ouden ME, Schuurmans MJ, Arts IE, van der Schouw YT (2011) Physical performance characteristics related to disability in older persons: a systematic review. Maturitas 69:208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeWalt DA, Hink A (2009) Health literacy and child health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Pediatrics 124(Suppl 3):S265–S274. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodds R, Denison HJ, Ntani G, Cooper R, Cooper C, Sayer AA, Baird J (2012) Birth weight and muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Health Aging 16:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dosemeci M, Wacholder S, Lubin JH (1990) Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value? Am J Epidemiol 132:746–748Google Scholar
  20. Eaton RJ, Bradley G (2008) The role of gender and negative affectivity in stressor appraisal and coping selection. Int J Stress Manag 15:94–115. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.15.1.94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksson JG et al (2015) Prenatal and childhood growth and physical performance in old age-findings from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study 1934–1944. Age 37:108. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9846-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferraro KF, Shippee TP (2009) Aging and cumulative inequality: how does inequality get under the skin? The Gerontologist 49:333–343. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forrest KY, Zmuda JM, Cauley JA (2006) Correlates of decline in lower extremity performance in older women: a 10-year follow-up study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:1194–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frederiksen H, Hjelmborg J, Mortensen J, McGue M, Vaupel JW, Christensen K (2006) Age trajectories of grip strength: cross-sectional and longitudinal data among 8,342 Danes aged 46 to 102. Ann Epidemiol 16:554–562. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galobardes B, Lynch JW, Smith GD (2004) Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality in adulthood: systematic review and interpretation. Epidemiol Rev 26:7–21. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxh008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galobardes B, Smith GD, Lynch JW (2006) Systematic review of the influence of childhood socioeconomic circumstances on risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Ann Epidemiol 16:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garbarski D (2010) Perceived social position and health: is there a reciprocal relationship? Soc Sci Med 70:692–699. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grandjean P et al (2015) Life-long implications of developmental exposure to environmental stressors: new perspectives. Endocrinology 156:3408–3415. doi: 10.1210/EN.2015-1350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guralnik JM et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:M85–M94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurst L, Stafford M, Cooper R, Hardy R, Richards M, Kuh D (2013) Lifetime socioeconomic inequalities in physical and cognitive aging. Am J Public Health 103:1641–1648. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen CB, Storgaard H, Madsbad S, Richter EA, Vaag AA (2007) Altered skeletal muscle fiber composition and size precede whole-body insulin resistance in young men with low birth weight. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1530–1534. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelly-Irving M et al (2013) Childhood adversity as a risk for cancer: findings from the 1958 British birth cohort study. BMC Public Health 13:767. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuh D, Hardy R, Butterworth S, Okell L, Wadsworth M, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A (2006) Developmental origins of midlife grip strength: findings from a birth cohort study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:702–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuh D, New Dynamics of Ageing Preparatory N (2007) A life course approach to healthy aging, frailty, and capability. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:717–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Landi F et al (2012) Sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls in elderly individuals: results from the ilSIRENTE study. Clin Nutr 31:652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leong DP et al (2015) Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet 386:266–273. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Litwin H (2009) Understanding aging in a Middle Eastern context: the SHARE-Israel survey of persons aged 50 and older. J Cross-Cult Gerontol 24:49–62. doi: 10.1007/s10823-008-9073-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lunau T, Siegrist J, Dragano N, Wahrendorf M (2015) The association between education and work stress: does the policy context matter? PLoS One 10:e0121573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller DK, Malmstrom TK, Miller JP, Andresen EM, Schootman M, Wolinsky FD (2010) Predictors of change in grip strength over 3 years in the African American health project. J Aging Health 22:183–196. doi: 10.1177/0898264309355816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohd Hairi F, Mackenbach JP, Andersen-Ranberg K, Avendano M (2010) Does socio-economic status predict grip strength in older Europeans? Results from the SHARE study in non-institutionalised men and women aged 50+. J Epidemiol Commun Health 64:829–837. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.088476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nahhas RW et al (2010) Bayesian longitudinal plateau model of adult grip strength. Am J Hum Biol 22:648–656. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nobles J, Weintraub MR, Adler NE (2013) Subjective socioeconomic status and health: relationships reconsidered. Soc Sci Med 82:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Rand AM (1996) The precious and the precocious: understanding cumulative disadvantage and cumulative advantage over the life course. The Gerontologist 36:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oksuzyan A, Maier H, McGue M, Vaupel JW, Christensen K (2010) Sex differences in the level and rate of change of physical function and grip strength in the Danish 1905-cohort study. J Aging Health 22:589–610. doi: 10.1177/0898264310366752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prag P, Mills MC, Wittek R (2015) Subjective socioeconomic status and health in cross-national comparison. Soc Sci Med 149:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson SM et al (2008) Diet and its relationship with grip strength in community-dwelling older men and women: the Hertfordshire cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:84–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01478.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabia S, Elbaz A, Rouveau N, Brunner EJ, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A (2014) Cumulative associations between midlife health behaviors and physical functioning in early old age: a 17-year prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 62:1860–1868. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanders LM, Zacur G, Haecker T, Klass P (2004) Number of children’s books in the home: an indicator of parent health literacy. Ambul Pediatr 4:424–428. doi: 10.1367/A04-003R.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Senese LC, Almeida ND, Fath AK, Smith BT, Loucks EB (2009) Associations between childhood socioeconomic position and adulthood obesity. Epidemiol Rev 31:21–51. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxp006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh-Manoux A, Marmot MG, Adler NE (2005) Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosom Med 67:855–861. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Starr JM, Deary IJ (2011) Socio-economic position predicts grip strength and its decline between 79 and 87 years: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. Age Ageing 40:749–752. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stenholm S, Tiainen K, Rantanen T, Sainio P, Heliovaara M, Impivaara O, Koskinen S (2012) Long-term determinants of muscle strength decline: prospective evidence from the 22-year mini-Finland follow-up survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:77–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03779.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sternang O, Reynolds CA, Finkel D, Ernsth-Bravell M, Pedersen NL, Aslan AKD (2015) Factors associated with grip strength decline in older adults. Age Ageing 44:269–274. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strand BH, Cooper R, Hardy R, Kuh D, Guralnik J (2011a) Lifelong socioeconomic position and physical performance in midlife: results from the British 1946 birth cohort. Eur J Epidemiol 26:475–483. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9562-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strand BH, Mishra G, Kuh D, Guralnik JM, Patel KV (2011b) Smoking history and physical performance in midlife: results from the British 1946 birth cohort. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 66:142–149. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tseng LA et al (2014) Body composition explains sex differential in physical performance among older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:93–100. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Uddin M, Sipahi L, Li J, Koenen KC (2013) Sex differences in DNA methylation may contribute to risk of PTSD and depression: a review of existing evidence. Depress Anxiety 30:1151–1160. doi: 10.1002/da.22167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Unesco (1997) International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 1997. Unesco, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Vermeulen J, Neyens JC, van Rossum E, Spreeuwenberg MD, de Witte LP (2011) Predicting ADL disability in community-dwelling elderly people using physical frailty indicators: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 11:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Visser M, Kritchevsky SB, Goodpaster BH, Newman AB, Nevitt M, Stamm E, Harris TB (2002) Leg muscle mass and composition in relation to lower extremity performance in men and women aged 70 to 79: the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ward RE, Leveille SG, Beauchamp MK, Travison T, Alexander N, Jette AM, Bean JF (2015) Functional performance as a predictor of injurious falls in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 63:315–320. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations