Skip to main content
Log in

Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Does employment provide respite or add stress to caregivers? As a result of population aging and increasing female employment rates, growing numbers are facing the competing demands of paid work and caregiving. This study explores the effect of providing regular personal care by employment status on six dimensions of psychological well-being. We concentrate on partner and parent care recipients and differentiate between in-household and out-of-household caregiving. We use cross-sectional data from the Norwegian Life Course, Ageing and Generation study (n = 11,047, age 25–64). Results indicate that out-of-household caregiving has no significant relationship with men or women’s well-being, irrespective of employment status. In-household caregiving, however, relates to lower psychological well-being, but only among women who do not work full-time. The advantages of full-time employment to caregivers may be due to greater opportunity to achieve the full benefits that this role has to offer. There is little to suggest that combining work and caregiving harms well-being. In fact, a “double burden” seems to be experienced by women who combine extensive caregiving with limited employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett RC, Hyde JS (2001) Women, men, work, and family: an expansionist theory. Am Psychol 56:781–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle BJ (1986) Recent developments in role theory. Ann Rev Sociol 12:67–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg C, Hallberg I (2006) Life satisfaction among informal caregivers in comparison with non-caregivers. Scand J Caring Sci 20:427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A (2005) Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung H, Tijdens K (2013) Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: using company-level data across 21 countries. Int J Hum Resour Man 24:1418–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin J (2010) Estimating the impact of caregiving and employment on well-being. Outcomes Insight Health Manag 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Daatland SO, Veenstra M, Lima IA (2010) Norwegian sandwiches: on the prevalence and consequences of family and work role squeezes over the life course. Eur J Ageing 7:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong-Gierveld J, van Tilburg T (1999) Manual of the loneliness scale. Department of Social Research Methodology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duxbury L, Higgings C, Schroeder B (2009) Balancing paid work and caregiving responsibilities: a closer look at family caregivers in Canada. Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlund J (2007) The work-family time squeeze: conflicting demands of paid and unpaid work among working couples in 29 countries. Int J Comp Sociol 48:451–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksen KI, Scharlach AE (1999) Employee family care responsibilities. Fam Relat 48:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie D (2003) The quality of working life: is Scandinavia different? Eur Sociol Rev 19:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautun H, Hagen K (2010) How do middle-aged employees combine work with caring for elderly parents? Community Work Fam 13:393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M, Hughes J (2005) Caring for adults and children. Fam Matters 70:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen T (2010) Subjective well-being in the second half of life: the influence of family and household resources. Dissertation, University of Oslo

  • Hansen T, Slagsvold B (2013) The psychological effects of providing personal care to a partner: a multidimensional perspective. Health Psychol Res 1:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen T, Slagsvold B, Ingebretsen R (2013) The strains and gains of caregiving: an examination of the effects of providing personal care to a parent on a range of psychological outcomes. Soc Ind Res 114:323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Rodrigues R, Hoffman F, Gasior K, Marin B (2009) Facts and figures on long-term care: Europe and North America. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvinden B (2010) The Nordic welfare model and the challenge of globalisation. In: Böss M (ed) The nation state in transformation: economic globalisation, institutional mediation and political values. University Press, Århus, pp 292–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson N, Kotsadam A, Szebehely M (2013) Informal eldercare and care for disabled children in the Nordic countries: prevalence and relation to employment. Nord J Soc Res 4:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsadam A (2012) The employment costs of caregiving in Norway. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 12:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly MB, Laporte A, Coyte PC (2010) Do they care too much to work? The influence of caregiving intensity on the labour force participation of unpaid caregivers in Canada. J Health Econ 29:895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks NF (1998) Does it hurt to care? Caregiving, work-family conflict, and midlife well-being. J Marr Fam 60:951–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martire LM, Stephens MAP, Atienza AA (1997) The interplay of work and caregiving: relationships between role satisfaction, role involvement, and caregivers’ well-being. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky J, Ross CE (2003) Social causes of psychological distress. de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E (1991) Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. J Pers Ass 57:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart M, Sorensen S (2011) Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison. Psychol Aging 26:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2003a) Associations of stressors and uplifts of caregiving with caregiver burden and depressive mood: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 58:112–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2003b) Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 18:250–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rønning R, Schanke T, Johansen V (2009) Frivillighetens muligheter i eldreomsorg. Østlandsforskning, Lillehammer

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber SD (1974) Toward a theory of role accumulation. Am Sociol Rev 39:567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold B, Veenstra M, Daatland SO, Hagestad G et al (2012) Life-course, ageing and generations in Norway: the NorLAG study. Nor Epidem 22:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennstedt SL, Crawford S, McKinlay JB (1993) Determining the pattern of community care: is coresidence more important than caregiver relationship? J Geron 48:S74–S83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits PA (1983) Multiple identities and psychological well-being: a reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. Am Sociol Rev 48:174–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toljamo M, Perala ML, Laukkala H (2012) Impact of caregiving on Finnish family caregivers. Scand J Caring Sci 26:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council (project EqualCare 196425/V50 and NorPAN 187783).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Hansen.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: H. Litwin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, T., Slagsvold, B. Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being. Eur J Ageing 12, 51–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y

Keywords

Navigation