European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 211–221 | Cite as

Prospective memory tasks related to goals and concerns are rated as more important by both young and older adults

Original Investigation

Abstract

There has been little research on variables that affect importance ratings for real prospective memory tasks (e.g., remembering to take medications). Our primary purpose was to test a claim in the motivational-cognitive model of prospective memory, namely that prospective memory tasks highly related to a person’s goals and concerns will be rated as more important. We also tested whether this relationship held in both young and older adults. A secondary purpose was to investigate age-related differences in the perceived importance of prospective memory tasks. Older adults and two younger adult groups completed a questionnaire that assessed current prospective memory tasks, their importance, and whether the tasks were related to participants’ goals and concerns. As predicted, participants provided higher importance ratings for prospective memory tasks that were highly relevant to their personal goals or concerns, and this was true for both young and older adults. Task importance ratings did not differ for older adults and young college students; however, young nonstudents rated their prospective memory tasks as less important than the other two groups. In all three groups, females gave higher prospective memory task importance ratings than males. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the importance of a prospective memory task is partly determined by its goal-relatedness. This newly demonstrated link suggests important avenues for future research, including research on the mechanisms through which goals improve prospective memory performance.

Keywords

Prospective memory Motivation Goals Young adults Older adults Gender 

References

  1. Aarts H, Dijksterhuis A (2000) Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:5–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altgassen M, Kliegel M, Brandimonte M, Filippello P (2010) Are older adults more social than younger adults? Social importance increases older adults’ prospective memory performance. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 17:312–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin JT, Vancouver JB (1996) Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process, and content. Psychol Bull 20:338–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura A, Cervone D (1983) Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:1017–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh J, Chen M, Burrows L (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:230–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter PG, Fleishman JA (1987) Linking intentions and behavior: Australian students’ college plans and college attendance. Am Educ Res 24:79–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavanaugh JC, Grady JG, Perlmutter M (1983) Forgetting and use of memory aides in 20 to 70-year-olds’ everyday life. Int J Aging Hum Dev 17:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceci SJ, Bronfenbrenner U (1985) “Don’t forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven”: prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Dev 56:152–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colley A, Ball J, Kirby N, Havey R, Vingelen I (2002) Gender-linked differences in everyday memory performance: effort makes the difference. Sex Roles 47:577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crovitz HF, Daniel WF (1984) Measurements of everyday memory: toward the prevention of forgetting. Bull Psychon Soc 22:413–414Google Scholar
  11. Eccles JS, Vida MN, Barber B (2004) The relation of early adolescents’ college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment. J Early Adolesc 24:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emmons RA (1989) The personal striving approach to personality. In: Pervin LA (ed) Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 87–126Google Scholar
  13. Fishbach A, Shah JY, Kruglanski AW (2004) Emotional transfer in goal systems. J Exp Soc Psychol 40:723–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman JE, Ellis JA (2003) The intention-superiority effect for naturally occurring activities: the role of intention accessibility in everyday prospective remembering in young and older adults. Int J Psychol 38:215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gollwitzer PM, Cohen A (2008) Commentary: goals and the intentions meant to fulfill them. In: Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (eds) Prospective memory: cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 101–114Google Scholar
  16. Gutman LM, Schoon I (2012) Correlates and consequences of uncertainty in career aspirations: gender differences among adolescents in England. J Vocat Behav 80:608–618Google Scholar
  17. Henry JD, MacLeod MS, Phillips LH, Crawford JR (2004) A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychol Aging 19:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huppert FA, Johnson T, Nickson J (2000) High prevalence of prospective memory impairment in the elderly and in early-stage dementia: findings from a population-based study. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:S63–S81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ihle A, Schnitzspahn K, Rendell PG, Luong C, Kliegel M (2012) Age benefits in everyday prospective memory: the influence of personal task importance, use of reminders and everyday stress. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 19:84–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kliegel M, Martin M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (2004) Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Mem 12:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kruglanski AW (1996) Goals as knowledge structures. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds) The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford, New York, pp 599–618Google Scholar
  22. Kvavilashvili L (1987) Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory. Br J Psychol 78:507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kvavilashvili L, Fisher L (2007) Is time-based prospective memory mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. J Exp Psychol Gen 136:112–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Little BR (1983) Personal projects: a rationale and method for investigation. Environ Behav 15:273–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markus H, Nurius P (1986) Possible selves. Am Psychol 41:954–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maylor EA, Logie RH (2010) A large-scale comparison of prospective and retrospective memory development from childhood to middle age. Q J Exp Psychol 63:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nurmi J (1992) Age differences in adult life goals, concerns, and their temporal extension: a life course approach to future-oriented motivation. Int J Behav Dev 15:487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patton GW, Meit M (1993) Effect of aging on prospective and incidental memory. Exp Aging Res 19:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Penningroth SL, Scott WD (2007) A motivational-cognitive model of prospective memory: the influence of goal relevance. In: Columbus F (ed) Psychology of motivation. Nova Science, Hauppauge, pp 115–128Google Scholar
  30. Penningroth SL, Scott WD (2012) Age-related differences in goals: testing predictions from selection, optimization, and compensation theory and socioemotional selectivity theory. Int J Aging Hum Dev 74:87–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Penningroth SL, Scott WD, Freuen M (2011) Social motivation in prospective memory: higher importance ratings and reported performance rates for social tasks. Can J Exp Psychol 65:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phillip LH, Henry JD, Martin M (2008) Adult aging and prospective memory: the importance of ecological validity. In: Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (eds) Prospective memory: cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 161–185Google Scholar
  33. Rendell PG, Craik FIM (2000) Virtual week and actual week: age-related differences in prospective memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:S43–S62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rendell PG, Thomson DM (1999) Aging and prospective memory: differences between naturalistic and laboratory tasks. J Geront Psychol Sci 54B:P256–P269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts BW, O’Donnell M, Robins RW (2004) Goal and personality trait development in emerging adulthood. J Pers Soc Psychol 87:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers WA (2000) Attention and aging. In: Park DC, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, pp 57–73Google Scholar
  37. Schnitzpahn KM, Ihle A, Henry JD, Rendell PG, Kliegel M (2011) The age-prospective memory-paradox: an exploration of possible mechanisms. Int Psychogeriatr 23:583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheeran P, Aarts H, Custers R, Rivis A, Webb TL, Cooke R (2005a) The goal-dependent automaticity of drinking habits. Br J Soc Psychol 44:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheeran P, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM (2005b) The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 31:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soler MJ, Ruiz JC (1996) The spontaneous use of memory aids at different educational levels. Appl Cogn Psychol 10:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soto CJ, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J (2011) Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. J Pers Soc Psychol 100:330–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Szarras K, Niedźwieńska A (2011) The role of rehearsals in self-generated prospective memory tasks. Int J Psychol 46:346–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wood D, Kurtz-Costes B, Copping KE (2011) Gender differences in motivational pathways to college for middle class African American youths. Dev Psychol 47:961–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Department 3415University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations