European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 11–23 | Cite as

Values and adult age: findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey

  • Oliver C. RobinsonEmail author
Original Investigation


Human values are assessed biannually in a multinational sample as part of the European Social Survey (ESS). Based on theories of adaptive ageing, it was predicted that ten lower order values and four higher order values would show age differences that would be invariant across (a) two sample cohorts (2002 and 2008), (b) gender and (c) 12 industrialised nations. The value categories measured by the ESS are the following: conservative values (tradition, conformity and security), openness to change values (self-direction, hedonism and stimulation), self-transcendent values (universalism, benevolence) and self-enhancement values (power, achievement). Of the ten lower order values, tradition shows the strongest positive relation with adult age, while the value of stimulation shows the strongest negative relation with age. With regards to the four higher order value categories, conservative values increased across age groups, while openness to change values decreased. Neither of these value types showed cohort or gender differences. Self-transcendence values were greater in midlife and older adults compared with young adults, were higher in women than in men, and higher in the 2008 compared with the 2002 cohort. Self-enhancement values showed a negative relation with age, with men of all age groups scoring higher in this value type than women. Age effects on the four higher order value types were replicated across all 12 countries in the sample, with the single exception of self-enhancement values in Spain, which show no relation with age.


Ageing Values Adulthood Gender Europe European Social Survey 


  1. Arnett JJ (2000) Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol 55:469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltes PB (1987) Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Dev Psychol 23:611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burr A, Santo JB, Pushkar D (2011) Affective wellbeing in retirement: the influence of values, money and health across three years. J Happiness Stud 12:17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST (1999) Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am Psychol 54:165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles ST, Carstensen LL (2009) Social and emotional aging. Annu Rev Psychol 61:383–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornelis I, Van Hiel A, Roets A, Kossowska M (2009) Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. J Pers 77:51–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa PT, McCrae RR (2003) Personality in adulthood: a five-factor theory perspective, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Cumming G, Finch S (2005) Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol 60:170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erikson E (1980) Identity and the life cycle. Norton and co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ersner-Hershfield H, Mikels JA, Sullivan SJ, Carstensen LL (2008) Poignancy: mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. J Pers Soc Psychol 94:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ESS Round 1: European Social Survey Round 1 Data (2002). Data file edition 6.2. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS dataGoogle Scholar
  14. ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data (2008). Data file edition 4.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS dataGoogle Scholar
  15. Groves RM (2006) Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q 70:646–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haskey J (2001) Cohabitation in Great Britain: past, present and future trends and attitudes. Popul Trends 103:4–25Google Scholar
  17. Heckhausen J, Wrosch C, Schulz R (2010) A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychol Rev 117:32–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Held M, Müller J, Deutsch F, Grzechnik E, Welzel C (2009) Value structure and dimensions. Empirical evidence from the German world values survey. World Values Res 2:55–76Google Scholar
  19. Hill WF (1960) Learning theory and the acquisition of values. Psychol Rev 67:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochschild A, Machung A (2012) The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home (revised edition). Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter JE (1997) Needed: a ban on the significance test. Psychol Sci 8:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull 129:339–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohlberg L (1973) Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. In: Baltes P, Schaie KW (eds) Lifespan developmental psychology: personality and socialisation. Academic Press, New York, pp 179–204Google Scholar
  24. Laslett P (1989) A fresh map of life: The emergence of the third age. George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Levinson DJ (1978) The seasons of a man’s life. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Levinson DJ (1996) The seasons of a woman’s life. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Maltby J (1997) The concurrent validity of a short measure of social conservatism among English students. Pers Individ Differ 23:901–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maslow AH (1987) Motivation and personality. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. McAdams DP, Hart HM, Maruna S (1998) The anatomy of generativity. In: McAdams DP, de S Aubin E (eds) Generativity and adult development. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 7–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olver JM, Mooradian TA (2003) Personality traits and personal values: a conceptual and empirical integration. Pers Individ Differ 35:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sagiv L, Schwartz SH (2000) Value priorities and subjective well-being: direct relations and congruity effects. Eur J Psychol 30:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saris WE (ed) (1988) Variation in response functions: a source of measurement error in attitude research. Sociom Res Found, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaie KW (1965) A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychol Bull 64:92–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaie KW (1996) Intellectual development in adulthood: the Seattle longitudinal study. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna M (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 25. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–65Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz SH (1996) Value priorities and behavior: applying a theory of integrated value systems. In: Seligman C, Olson JM, Zanna MP (eds) The psychology of values: the Ontario symposium, vol 8. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  37. Schwartz SH (2006) Basic human values: theory, measurement and applications. Rev Fr Sociol 42:249–288Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1987) Toward a psychological structure of human values. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:550–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1990) Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:878–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz SH, Rubel T (2005) Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multi-method studies. J Pers Soc Psychol 89:1010–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz SH, Sagiv L, Boehnke K (2000) Worries and values. J Pers 68:309–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz SH, Melech G, Lehmann A, Burgess S, Harris M, Owens V (2001) Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J Cross Cult Psychol 32:519–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tornstam L (1989) Gerotranscendence: a reformulation of the disengagement theory. Aging 1:55–63Google Scholar
  44. Tornstam L (1997) Gerotranscendence: the contemplative dimension of aging. J Aging Stud 11:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Twenge J, Campbell WK (2009) The Narcissism epidemic: living in the age of entitlement. Free Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaillant GE (2002) Aging well. Little, Brown and Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiss HM (1978) Social learning of work values in organizations. J Appl Psychol 63:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Widimer ED, Treas J, Newcomb R (1998) Attitudes towards nonmarital sex in 24 countries. J Sex Res 35:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wood W (2000) Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annu Rev Psychol 51:539–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations