European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 47–55 | Cite as

Home help services in Sweden: responsiveness to changing demographics and needs

  • Jyoti Savla
  • Adam Davey
  • Gerdt Sundström
  • Steven H. Zarit
  • Bo Malmberg
Original Investigation


Decreases in Swedish home help services have not resulted in increased rates of unmet need. To understand these changes, we identified predictors of home help services and rates of institutional care and how these effects changed over time using longitudinal data (1994–2000) from 286 Swedish municipalities. Outcomes were home help coverage rates, intensity of home help per recipient, and rates of institutional living. Predictors reflected availability and need for services. Services decreased over time, but not uniformly. Coverage rates were higher in municipalities with a greater proportion of population 65 and older and greater proportion of unmarried elders. Decreases in coverage rates were greater in municipalities with a higher proportion of unmarried elders, greater ratio of older women to men, with more home help staff workers, and more expensive services. Home help was provided more intensively in municipalities with higher median incomes, higher unemployment rates and municipalities spending more per inhabitant on child care. Decreases in intensity were greater in municipalities with lower proportions of unmarried elders and fewer home help staff workers. Rates of institutional living were higher in municipalities that spent more on old age services and with a greater proportion of unmarried elders. Decreases in institutionalization were greater in municipalities with a greater proportion of unmarried elders and lower ratio of older women to men. Variability in how municipalities responded to these changes may explain continued low rates of unmet need. Results are consistent with both increased efficiency and more effective targeting, but cannot capture service quality.


Home help services Sweden Institutional care Targeting 


  1. Attias-Donfut C, Ogg J, Wolff F-C (2005) European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. Eur J Ageing 2:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batljan I, Lagergren M (2005) Future demand for formal long-term care in Sweden. Eur J Ageing 2:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg S, Branch LG, Doyle A, Sundström G (1993) Local variations in old-age care in the welfare-state: the case of Sweden. Health Policy 24:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broese van Groenou M, Glaser K, Tomassini C, Jacobs T (2006) Socio-economic status differences in older people’s use of informal and formal help: a comparison of four European countries. Ageing Soc 26:745–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daatland SO, Lowenstein A (2005) Intergenerational solidarity and the family-welfare state balance. Eur J Ageing 2:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daatland SO (1997) Welfare policies for older people in transition? Emerging trends and comparative perspectives. Scand J Soc Welfare 6:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davey A, Femia EE, Zarit SH, Shea DG, Sundström G, Berg S, Smyer MA, Savla J (2005) Life on the edge: patterns of formal and informal help to older adults in the United States and Sweden. J Gerontol Psychol Soc Sci 60B:S281–S288Google Scholar
  8. Davey A, Johansson L, Malmberg B, Sundström G (2006) Unequal but equitable: an analysis of variations in old-age care in Sweden. Eur J Ageing 3:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davey A, Savla J, Sundström G, Zarit SH, Malmberg B (2007) How equitable is Sweden’s changing care mix? Linking individual and regional characteristics over time. Ageing Soc 27:511–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egleston BL, Rudberg MA, Brody JA (1999) Prior living arrangements and nursing home resident admission ADL characteristics: a study of two states. J Gerontol Soc Sci 54B:S202–S206Google Scholar
  11. Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanssen JI (1997) The Scandinavian model as seen from a local perspective. In: Sipilä J (ed) Social care services: the key to the scandinavian welfare model. Aldershot, AveburyGoogle Scholar
  13. Hörstedt J, Prütz C, Wells C, Edebalk PG, Lindgren B (1996) Hur kan man förstå variationer i kostnaderna för kommunernas älder—och handikappomsorg? En explorative förklaringsmodell (How can we understand the cost-variations in municipal care of elderly and disabled persons? An explorative model of explanation). University of Lund, Studies in Health Economy, 15Google Scholar
  14. IMSERSO (2005) Cuidados a las personas mayores en los hogares Espanoles. El entorno familiar. Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, MadridGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeger F (2005) L’allocation personnalisée d’autonomie: une analyse des disparités départementales en 2003. Études et Résultats No. 372. Paris: Direction de la Recherche des Études de l’Évaluation et des Statistiques, Ministère de la Santé et des SolidaritésGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansson L, Sundström G, Hassing LB (2003) State provision down, offspring’s up: the reverse substitution of old-age care in Sweden. Ageing Soc 23:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larsson K (2006) Care needs and home-help services for older people in Sweden: does improved functioning account for the reduction in public care? Ageing Soc 26:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsson K, Thorslund M (2002) Does gender matter? Differences in patterns of informal support and formal services in a Swedish urban elderly population. Res Aging 24:308–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meinow B, Kareholt I, Lagergren M (2005) According to need? Predicting the amount of municipal home help allocated to elderly recipients in an urban area of Sweden. Health Soc Care Community 14:366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muramatsu N, Campbell RT (2002) State expenditures on home help services and use of formal and informal personal assistance: A multilevel analysis. J Health Soc Behav 43:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muramatsu N, Yin H, Campbell RT, Hoyem RL, Jacob MA, Ross CO (2007) Risk of nursing home admission among older Americans: does states’ spending on home- and community-based services matter? J Gerontol: Soc Sci 62B:S169–S178Google Scholar
  22. Ogg J, Renault S (2006) The support of parents in old age by those born during 1945–1954: a European perspective. Ageing Soc 26:723–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development (2005) Long-term care for older people. OECD Health Project. Author, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Petite S, Weber A (2006) Les effets de l’allocation personnalisée sur l’aide dispensée aux personnes agées. Études et Résultats No. 459. Paris: Direction de la Recherche des Études de l’Évaluation et des Statistiques, Ministère de la Santé et des SolidaritésGoogle Scholar
  25. Shea D, Davey A, Femia EE, Zarit SH, Sundström G, Berg S, Smyer MA (2003) Exploring assistance in Sweden and the United States. Gerontologist 43:712–721Google Scholar
  26. Stata Corp (2007) Longitudinal/panel data reference manual. Author, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  27. Statistics Sweden (1993) Pensionärer 1980–1989 [Old people 1980–1989]. Levnadsförhållanden, Rapport 81Google Scholar
  28. Statistiska Centralbyrån (2003) Undersökningen av levnadsförhållanden [Level of Living]. Statistics SwedenGoogle Scholar
  29. Sundström G, Malmberg B (1996) The long arm of the welfare state shortened. Scand J Soc Welfare 5:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sundström G, Johansson L, Hassing LB (2002) The shifting balance of long-term care in Sweden. Gerontologist 42:350–355Google Scholar
  31. Sundström G, Malmberg B, Castiello MS, del Barrio É, Castejon P, Tortosa MA, Johansson L (2007) Family care for elders in Europe: policies and practices. In: Szinovacz ME, Davey A (eds) Caregiving contexts: cultural, familial, and societal implications. Springer, New York, pp 235–267Google Scholar
  32. Sundström G, Malmberg B, Johannson L (2006) Balancing family and state care: neither, either or both? The case of Sweden. Ageing Soc 26:767–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trydegård G-B, Thorslund M (2001) Inequality in the welfare state? Local variation in the care of the elderly—the case of Sweden. Int J Soc Welfare 10:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vass M, Avlund K, Parner ET, Hendriksen C (2007a) Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people and different functional decline patterns. Eur J Ageing 4:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vass M, Holmberg R, Fiil-Nielsen H, Lauridsen J, Avlund K, Hendriksen C (2007b) Preventive home visitation programmes for older people: the role of municipality organisation. Eur J Ageing 4:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young H, Grundy E, Kalogirou S (2005) Who cares? Geographical variation in unpaid caregiving in England and Wales: evidence from the 2001 census. Popul Trends 120:23–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jyoti Savla
    • 1
  • Adam Davey
    • 2
  • Gerdt Sundström
    • 3
  • Steven H. Zarit
    • 4
  • Bo Malmberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for GerontologyVirginia Polytechnic and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.College of Health ProfessionsTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Institute for GerontologyJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  4. 4.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations