Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of inhibitory control in age-related operation span performance

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was conducted to examine the inhibitory deficit theory on cognitive performance in old age. An experimental manipulation was applied to investigate if the efficiency of inhibitory control directly affects age-related working memory performance as measured by the operation span task. Forty-two older (M = 67 years, SD = 5.12) and 42 younger adults (M = 25 years, SD = 4.06) performed two versions of the operation span task that differed in the inhibitory demands placed on working memory. Age effects were confirmed for both versions of the operation span task. Importantly, the age effect was qualified by an age × inhibitory demands interaction indicating that age differences in the high inhibitory-demands condition were even larger than in the standard condition. In conclusion, this supports the assumption that inhibitory deficits contribute to age-related working memory performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to a violation of homogeneity of regression, the variable years of education could not be used as covariate.

References

  • Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bopp KL, Verhaeghen P (2005) Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 60B:P223–P233

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles RP, Salthouse TA (2003) Assessing the age-related effects of proactive interference on working memory tasks using the Rasch model. Psychol Aging 18:608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting M (2006) Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 32:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe P, Hasher L, Siegel LS (2000) Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Mem Cogn 28:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly SL, Hasher L, Zacks RT (1991) Age and reading: the impact of distraction. Psychol Aging 6:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway ARA, Engle RW (1996) Individual differences in working memory capacity: more evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory 4:577–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway ARA, Kane MJ, Bunting MF, Hambrick DZ, Wilhelm O, Engle RW (2005) Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon Bull Rev 12:769–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik FIM (2000) Age-related changes in human memory. In: Park DC, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman M, Merikle PM (1996) Working memory and language comprehension: a meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 3:422–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs AR, Rule BG (1989) Adult age differences in working memory. Psychol Aging 4:500–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty MRP, Hunter JE (2003) Hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and individual differences in working memory capacity. Acta Psychol 113:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JL, Qualls CD (2000) The association of elaborative or maintenance rehearsal with age, reading comprehension, and verbal working memory performance. Aphasiology 14:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher L, Zacks RT (1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol 22. Academic, San Diego, pp 193–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher L, Stoltzfus ER, Zacks RT, Rypma B (1991) Age and inhibition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 17:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold C, Towse JN (2006) Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience 139:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegel M, Phillips LH, Lemke U, Kopp U (2005) Planning and realization of complex intentions in Parkinson patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1501–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrl S (1977) Der Mehrfachwahlwortschatztest MWT-B. Straube, Erlangen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig C, May CP, Hasher L (2001) Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May CP, Hasher L, Kane MJ (1999) The role of interference in memory span. Mem Cogn 27:759–767

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowd JM (1997) Inhibition in attention and aging. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 52B:P265–P273

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowd JM, Oseas-Kreger DM, Filion DL (1995) Inhibitory processes in cognition and aging. In: Dempster FN, Brainerd CJ (eds) Interference and inhibition in cognition. Academic, San Diego, pp 363–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41:49–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller ST, Seymour TL, Kieras DE, Meyer DE (2003) Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:1353–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park DC (2000) The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In: Park DC, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips LH, Hamilton C (2001) The working memory model in adults aging research. In: Andrade J (ed) Working memory in perspective. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 101–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter-Lorenz PA, Marshuetz C, Jonides J, Smith EE, Hartley A, Koeppe R (2001) Neurocognitive ageing of storage and executive processes. Eur J Cogn Psychol 13:257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Hasher L, Turcotte J (2006) Here today, gone tomorrow: eliminating age differences on a working memory task. Poster presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference 2006, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

  • Schelstraete M-A, Hupet M (2002) Cognitive aging and inhibitory efficiency in the Daneman and Carpenter’s working memory task. Exp Aging Res 28:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RJ (1991) Age related increases in the effects of automatic semantic activation. Psychol Aging 6:595–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltzfus ER, Hasher L, Zacks RT (1996) Working memory and aging: current status of the inhibitory view. In: Richardson JTE, Engle RW, Hasher L, Logie RH, Stoltzfus ER, Zacks RT (eds) Working memory and human cognition. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 66–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Turley-Ames KJ, Whitfield MM (2003) Strategy training and working memory task performance. J Mem Lang 49:446–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner ML, Engle RW (1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? J Mem Lang 28:127–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks RT, Hasher L (1997) Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: a reply to Burke and McDowd. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 52B:P274–P283

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacks RT, Hasher L, Li KZH (2000) Human memory. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA (eds) The handbook of aging and cognition. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 293–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeintl M, Kliegel M (2007) How do verbal distractors influence age-related operation span performance? A manipulation of inhibitory control demands. Exp Aging Res 33:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology, Zellescher Weg 17, 01062, Dresden, Germany

    Melanie Zeintl & Matthias Kliegel

Authors
  1. Melanie Zeintl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Kliegel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Zeintl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeintl, M., Kliegel, M. The role of inhibitory control in age-related operation span performance. Eur J Ageing 4, 213–217 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-007-0066-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-007-0066-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation