European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 34–40 | Cite as

Unequal but equitable: an analysis of variations in old-age care in Sweden

  • Adam Davey
  • Lennarth Johansson
  • Bo Malmberg
  • Gerdt Sundström
Original Investigation

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether contraction in services has led to inequitable service levels or simply large local variations. Previous attempts to explain service variations with aggregate, municipal level data have failed. We link representative Swedish data from 3,267 individuals aged 65 and older in 2002–2003 with coverage rates of public Home Help services in the 288 municipalities in which they reside. What past attempts have masked is that needs also vary substantially between municipalities; needs being defined as old people who live alone and need help with their activities of daily living (ADL). Once these local individual level variations are incorporated, municipal differences in public Home Help coverage largely vanish. Multivariate analyses confirm that advanced age, inability to perform ADL and solitary living are the major determinants of Home Help use. Variations in local supply have no association with individual use of public Home Help. These services are unequal but hence yet deemed to be reasonably equitable.

Keywords

Home Help Services Needs Equity Regional variability 

References

  1. Berg S, Branch L, Doyle A, Sundström G (1993) Local variations in old age care in the Welfare State: the case of Sweden. Health Policy 24:175–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Daatland S-O, Sundström G (1985) Gammal i Norden. /Old age in the Nordic countries/Nordic Council of Ministers, OsloGoogle Scholar
  3. Daatland S-O (ed) (1997) De siste årene. Eldreomsorgen i Skandinavia 1960–95/The last years. Old-age care in Scandinavia 1960–95/NOVA, Oslo, Rapport 22/97Google Scholar
  4. Daatland S-O, Lowenstein A (2005) Intergenerational solidarity and the family-welfare state balance. Eur J Ageing 2:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davey A, Femia EE, Shea DG, Zarit SH, Sundström G, Berg S, Smyer MA (1999) How much do families help? A cross-national comparison. J Aging Health 11:199–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davey A, Femia EE, Zarit SH, Shea DG, Sundstrom G, Berg S, Smyer MA, Savla J (2005) Life on the edge: patterns of formal and informal help to older adults in the United States and Sweden. J Gerontol Soc Sci 60B:S281–S288Google Scholar
  7. Deeming C, Keen J (2003) A fair deal for care in older age? Public attitudes towards the funding of long-term care. Policy Polit 31:431–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egleston BL, Rudberg MA, Brody JA (1999) Prior living arrangements and nursing home resident admission ADL characteristics: a study of two states. J Gerontol Soc Sci 54B:S202–S206Google Scholar
  9. Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Le Grand J, Winter D (1992) Equity in health and social care. J Soc Policy 21:489–523Google Scholar
  10. Johansson L, Sundström G (2005) Policies and practices in support for family caregivers. Filial obligations redefined in Sweden? J Am Social Policy Res (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Lagergren M, Johansson P-Å (1996) Finns det systematiska skillnader i biståndsbesluten mellan socialdistrikten i Stockholm? /Are there systematic differences in needs assessments between districts in Stockholm?/ Stiftelsen Stockholms Läns Äldrecentrum, Stockholm, Rapport 1996:3Google Scholar
  12. Li LW (2005) Longitudinal changes in the amount of informal care among publicly paid home care recipients. Gerontologist 45:465–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin G, Zimmer Z (2002) A geographical analysis of spatial differentials in mobility and self-care limitations among older Americans. Int J Popul Geogr 8:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meinow B, Kåreholt I, Lagergren M (2005) According to need? Predicting the amount of municipal home help allocated to elderly recipients in an urban area of Sweden. Health Soc Care Community 14:366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muramatsu N, Campbell RT (2002) State expenditures on home and community based services and use of formal and informal personal assistance: a multilevel analysis. J Health Soc Behav 43:107–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shea D, Davey A, Femia EE, Zarit SH, Sundstrom G, Berg S, Smyer MA (2003) Exploring assistance in Sweden and the United States. Gerontologist 43:712–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Socialstyrelsen (1996) De äldsta i stad och på landsbygd i Jönköping 1996. /The old–old in town and countryside in Jönköping in 1996/ Ädel 50Google Scholar
  18. Statistics Sweden 1993 Pensionärer 1980–1989 /Old people 1980–1989/. Levnadsförhållanden, Rapport 81Google Scholar
  19. Statistiska Centralbyrån (2003). Undersökning om levnadsförhållanden [Level of Living] [Data file]. Statistics SwedenGoogle Scholar
  20. Sundström G, Berg S (1990) Ensamboende bland de äldre: en analys av kommunala variationer och deras effekter på äldreomsorgen. PM utarbetat för Socialdepartementet. /Solitary living among elderly people: an analysis of municipal variations and their effects on public old age care. Memorandum for the Ministry of Social Affairs/ Institutet för gerontologi, Jönköping, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  21. Sundström G, Johansson L, Hassing L (2002) The shifting balance of long-term care in Sweden. Gerontologist 42(3):350–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Thorslund M, Bergmark Å, Parker MG (1997) Difficult decisions on care on care and services for elderly people: the dilemma of setting priorities in the welfare state. Scandinavian J Soc Welf 6:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trydegård G-B, Thorslund M (2001) Inequality in the welfare state? Local variation in care of the elderly––the case of Sweden. Int J Soc Welf 10:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Young H, Grundy E, Kalogirou S (2005) Who cares? Geographical variation in unpaid caregiving in England and Wales: evidence from the 2001 census. Popul Trends 120:23–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. http://www.sos.se The web page of The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Davey
    • 1
  • Lennarth Johansson
    • 2
  • Bo Malmberg
    • 3
  • Gerdt Sundström
    • 3
  1. 1.Polisher Research InstituteNorth WalesUSA
  2. 2.SocialstyrelsenStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Institute of Gerontology, School of Health SciencesJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations