Abstract
Although it is generally acknowledged that housing is a major issue regarding health in old and very old age, most empirical research still tends to treat the role of the housing environment in a rather superficial manner. The cross-national project Enabling Autonomy, Participation, and Well-Being in Old Age: The Home Environment as a Determinant for Healthy Ageing (ENABLE-AGE) seeks to make a substantial contribution to this shortcoming. The main objective of the project is to examine subjective and objective aspects of housing and their impact on health in very old age, while health is understood mainly in terms of autonomy, participation and well-being. The project involves five European Union member countries, i.e. Sweden (coordinating unit), Germany, the United Kingdom, Latvia and Hungary. The total sample includes 1,918 older adults in the age range of 75–89 years and living in single households. We provide a systematic analysis of major challenges coming with cross-national research in the housing and ageing domain based on the experience of the ENABLE-AGE Project. Treated are: challenges related to sampling and data collection procedures, challenges related to inclusion and exclusion criteria based on housing characteristics, challenges related to differences in housing legislation, norms, and guidelines, challenges related different availability of professional expertise for person-environment assessments, challenges related to valid and reliable person-environment assessments, and challenges related to the interpretation of housing-related findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acsády J, Kucsera C, Széman Z (2004) ENABLE-AGE survey study T1: national report Hungary. Project QLRT-2001-0, delivered to the European Commission. Institute of Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest
Baltes PB, Smith J (1999) Multilevel and systemic analyses of old age: theoretical and empirical evidence for a fourth age. In: Bengtson VL, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of theories of aging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 153–173
Brandt Å, Iwarsson S, Ståhl A (2004) Older people’s use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. J Rehabil Med 36:70–77
Charmaz K (1996) Grounded theory. In: Smith JA (ed) Rethinking methods in psychology. Sage, London, pp 27–49
Charmaz K (2003) Grounded theory. In: Smith JA (ed) Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods. Sage, London, pp 81–110
Fänge A, Iwarsson S (2003) Accessibility and usability in housing—construct validity and implications for research and practice. Disabil Rehabil 25:1316–1325
Gitlin LN (1998) Testing home modification interventions: issues of theory, measurement, design, and implementation. In: Schulz, Maddox, Lawton (eds) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics. Interventions research with older adults. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 190–246
Gitlin LN (2003) Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. Gerontologist 43:628–637
Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago
Harkness J (1999) In pursuit of quality: issues for cross-national survey research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2:2:125–140
Iwarsson S (2004) Assessing the fit between older people and their home environments—an occupational therapy research perspective. In: Wahl H-W, Scheidt R, Windley P (ed) Environments, gerontology and old age. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr 23:85–109
Iwarsson S, Slaug B (2001) The Housing Enabler. An instrument for assessing and analysing accessibility problems in housing. Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Data Management, Nävlinge and Staffanstorp
Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å (1996) Development of a novel instrument for occupational therapy assessment of the physical environment in the home—a methodologic study on “the Enabler”. Occup Ther J Res 16:227–244
Iwarsson S, Ståhl A (2003) Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil 25:57–66
Iwarsson S, Sixsmith J, Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Nygren C, Sixsmith A, Széman Z, Tomsone S (2004) The ENABLE-AGE Project: multi-dimensional methodology for European housing research. In: Wilkinson N, Hurol Y (eds) Housing research methodologies. Urban International, Mersin
Iwarsson S, Nygren C, Slaug B (2004) Cross-national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the Housing Enabler. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (in press)
Jackson J (2002) Conceptual, methodological linkages in cross-cultural groups, cross-national aging research. J Soc Issues 58:4:825–835
Kahana E (1982) A congruence model of person-environment interaction. In: Lawton, Windley, Byerts (eds) Aging and the environment. Theoretical approaches. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 97–121
Kohn ML (1987) Cross-national research as analytic strategy. Am Sociol Rev 52:713–731
Kovács M (2000) Housing conditions of the elderly. In: Szücs Z (ed) The situation of the elderly in Hungary in the 90s (in Hungarian). HU, Budapest, pp 47–56
Lawton MP (1983) Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist 23:349–357
Lawton MP, Nahemow L (1973) Ecology and the aging process. In. Eisdorfer C, Lawton MP (eds) The psychologist of adult development and aging. American Psychological Association, Washington
Lawton MP, Simon B (1968) The ecology of social relationships in housing for the elderly. Gerontologist 8:108–115
Lynn P (2003) Developing quality standards for cross-national survey research five approaches. Int J Soc Res Methodol 4:323–336
Morgan K (1998) The Nottingham Longitudinal Study of Activity and Ageing: a methodological overview. Age Ageing 27:5–11
Nygren C, Johannisson A, Iwarsson S (2004) ENABLE-AGE Survey Study T1: national report Sweden Project QLRT-2001-00334, delivered to the European Commision. Lund University, Lund
Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Mollenkopf H et al (2004) ENABLE-AGE. Survey study T1. Preliminary descriptive findings from Germany. Report no 18. German Centre for Research on Ageing, Heidelberg
Preiser WFE, Ostroff E (eds) (2001) Universal design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York
Scheidt RJ, Norris-Baker C (2004) The general ecological model revisited: evolution, current status, continuing challenges. In: Wahl H-W, Scheidt RJ, Windley PG (eds) Aging in context: socio-physical environments. Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol 23. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 34–58
Singh J (1995) Measurement issues in cross-national research. J Int Business Studies 26:3:597–619
Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J, Green S et al (2004) ENABLE-AGE Survey Study T1: national report United Kingdom. Project QLRT-2001-00334, delivered to the European Commision. University of Liverpool, Liverpool
Slaug B, Iwarsson S (2001) Housing Enabler 1.0—a tool for housing accessibility analysis. Software for PC. Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Data Management, Nävlinge and Staffanstorp
Steinfeld E, Danford GS (1999) Theory as a basis for research on enabling environments. In: Steinfeld E, Danford GS (eds) Enabling environments. Measuring the impact of environment on disability and rehabilitation. Kluwer/Plenum, New York
Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC (1999) Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 48:445–469
Tomsone S, Litvjakova N, Teibe U (2004) ENABLE-AGE Survey Study T1: national report Latvia. Project QLRT-2001-00334, delivered to the European Commission. University of Riga, Riga
Treloar C, Graham ID (2003) Multidisciplinary cross national studies: a commentary on issues on collaboration, methodology, analysis, publication. Qual Health Res 13:7:924–932
Verbrugge LM, Jette AM (1994) The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 38:1–14
Wahl HW (2001) Environmental influences on aging and behavior. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW, (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging. Academic, San Diego, pp 215–237
Wahl H-W, Weisman GD (2003) Environmental gerontology at the beginning of the new millennium: reflections on its historical, empirical, and theoretical development. Gerontologist 43:616–627
Wahl HW, Oswald F, Zimprich D (1999) Everyday competence in visually impaired older adults: a case for person-environment perspectives. Gerontologist 39:140–149
Wahl H-W, Scheidt R, Windley P (eds) (2004) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol 23. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
World Health Organisation (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). WHO, Geneva
Acknowledgements
The ENABLE-AGE Project is funded by the European Commission (QLRT-2001-00334). We are also grateful to the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS), the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS), and the Swedish Research Council for additional funding. We thank the national team leaders for providing input: Dr. F. Oswald, German Centre for Research on Ageing at the University of Heidelberg, Germany, Dr. A. Sixsmith, University of Liverpool, UK, Dr. J. Sixsmith, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK, Dr. Z. Széman, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary, and reg. occupational therapist S. Tomsone, Riga Stradinja University, Latvia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwarsson, S., Wahl, HW. & Nygren, C. Challenges of cross-national housing research with older persons: lessons from the ENABLE-AGE project. Eur J Ageing 1, 79–88 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-004-0010-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-004-0010-5