Advertisement

Acta Mechanica Sinica

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 902–909 | Cite as

Phase transition and dynamics of iron under ramp wave compression

  • T. Chong
  • Z. P. Tang
  • F. L. Tan
  • G. J. Wang
  • J. H. Zhao
Research Paper
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

The ramp wave compression experiments of iron with different thicknesses were performed on the magnetically driven ramp loading device CQ-4. Numerical simulations of this process were done with Hayes multi-phase equation of state (H-MEOS) and dynamic equations of phase transition. The calculated results of H-MEOS are in good agreement with those of shock phase transition, but are different from those under ramp wave compression. The reason for this is that the bulk modulus of the material in the Hayes model and the wave velocity are considered constant. Shock compression is a jump from the initial state to the final state, and the sound speed is related to the slope of the Rayleigh line. However, ramp compression is a continuous process, and the bulk modulus is no longer a constant but a function of pressure and temperature. Based on Murnaghan equation of state, the first-order correction of the bulk modulus on pressure in the Hayes model was carried out. The numerical results of the corrected H-MEOS agree well with those of pure iron in both ramp and shock compression phase transition experiments. The calculated results show that the relaxation time of iron is about 30 ns and the phase transition pressure is about 13 GPa. There are obvious differences between the isentropic and adiabatic process in terms of pressure–specific volume and temperature–pressure. The fluctuation of the sound speed after 13 GPa is caused by the phase transition.

Keywords

Ramp wave compression Polymorphic phase transition Multiphase equation of state Sound speed 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to extend his appreciation to Dr. Zhenfei Song and Dr. Hongping Zhang for their discussion on analysis of the physical process. Special thanks are expressed to Mr. Wu, Mr. Xu, Mr. Shui, and Mr. Deng for their excellent operation CQ-4 and PDV measurements. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 11327803), the project of Youth Innovation of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (Grant 2016TD0022), and the National Challenging Plan (Grant JCKY2016212A501).

References

  1. 1.
    Bancroft, D., Peterson, E.L., Minshall, S.: Polymorphism of iron at high pressure. J. Appl. Phys. 27, 291–298 (1956).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jamieson, J.C., Lawson, A.W.: X-Ray diffraction studies in the 100 kilobar pressure range. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 776–780 (1962).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1777167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barker, L.M., Hollenbach, R.E.: Shock wave study of the \(\alpha \rightleftarrows \varepsilon \) phase transition in iron. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 4872–4887 (1974).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1663148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forbes, J.W.: Experimental investigation of the kinetics of the shock-induced phase transformation in Armco iron. NSWC TR 77–137 (1976) (Unpublished)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asay, J.R., Hall, C.A., Holland, K.G., et al.: Isentropic compression of iron with the Z accelerator. J. Appl. Phys. 505, 1151–1154 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1303667
  6. 6.
    Hayes, D.B.: Wave propagation in a condensed medium with N transforming phases: application to solid-I-solid-II-liquid bismuth. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 3438–3443 (1975).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.322065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wei, H.G., Brambrink, E., Benuzzi-Mounaix, A., et al.: Study of iron under high pressure conditions using isentropic compression. Am. Inst. Phys. 1195, 727–730 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3295243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chong, T., Wang, G.J., Luo, B.Q., et al.: Phase transition of iron under magnetically driven quasi-isentropic compression. Sci. China 44, 630–636 (2014). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, G.J., Luo, B.Q., Zhang, X.P., et al.: A 4 MA, 500 ns pulsed power generator CQ-4 for characterization of material behaviors under ramp wave loading. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 015117 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4788935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao, J.H., Luo, B.Q., Wang, G.J., et al.: Dynamic Behaviors of Materials Under Ramp Wave Loading on Compact Pulsed Power Generators. APS Meeting, APS Meeting Abstracts (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, G.J., Cai, J.T., Zhao, J.H., et al.: The Dynamic Behaviors of Single Crystal RDX Under Ramp Wave Loading to 15 GPa APS Meeting. APS Meeting Abstracts (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo, B.Q., Li, M., Wang, G.J., et al.: Strain rate and hydrostatic pressure effects on strength of iron. Mech. Mater. 114, 142–146 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo, B.Q., Chen, X.M., Wang, G.J., et al.: Dynamic strength measurement of aluminum under magnetically driven ramp wave pressure-shear loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 100, 56–61 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, X.P., Wang, G.J., Luo, B.Q., et al.: Mechanical response of near-equiatomic NiTi alloy at dynamic high pressure and strain rate. J. Alloys Compd. 731, 569–576 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, C.A., Asay, J.R., Knudson, M.D., et al.: Experimental configuration for isentropic compression of solids using pulsed magnetic loading. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 3587–3595 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1394178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo, Y.B., Tang, Z.P., Xu, S.L.: A critical criterion for phase transition considering both hydrostatic pressure and partial stress effects. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 25, 417–422 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0254-7805.2004.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boettger, J.C., Wallace, D.C.: Metastability and dynamics of the shock-induced phase transition in iron. Phys. Rev. B 55, 2840 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.2840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson, G.R., Cook, W.H.: A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: 7th International Symposium (1983)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ding, J.L., Asay, J.R.: Material characterization with ramp wave experiments. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 073517 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2709878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson, P.C., Stein, B.A., Davis, R.S.: Temperature dependence of shock-induced phase transformations in iron. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 557–561 (1962).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bundy, F.P.: Pressure–temperature phase diagram of iron to 200 kbar, \(900\,^{\circ }\text{ C }\). J. Appl. Phys. 36, 616–620 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaufman, L., Clougherty, E.V., Weiss, R.J.: The lattice stability of metals-III. Iron. Acta Metall. 11, 323–335 (1963).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(63)90157-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, R.F., Eggert, J.H., Swift, D.C., et al.: Time-dependence of the alpha to epsilon phase transformation in iron. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 223507 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4839655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Modern MechanicsUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina
  2. 2.Institute of Fluid PhysicsChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsMianyangChina

Personalised recommendations