Skip to main content
Log in

Transport mechanisms of contaminants released from fine sediment in rivers

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contaminants released from sediment into rivers are one of the main problems to study in environmental hydrodynamics. For contaminants released into the overlying water under different hydrodynamic conditions, the mechanical mechanisms involved can be roughly divided into convective diffusion, molecular diffusion, and adsorption/desorption. Because of the obvious environmental influence of fine sediment (\(D_{90}=\) 0.06 mm), non-cohesive fine sediment, and cohesive fine sediment are researched in this paper, and phosphorus is chosen for a typical adsorption of a contaminant. Through theoretical analysis of the contaminant release process, according to different hydraulic conditions, the contaminant release coupling mathematical model can be established by the N–S equation, the Darcy equation, the solute transport equation, and the adsorption/desorption equation. Then, the experiments are completed in an open water flume. The simulation results and experimental results show that convective diffusion dominates the contaminant release both in non-cohesive and cohesive fine sediment after their suspension, and that they contribute more than 90 % of the total release. Molecular diffusion and desorption have more of a contribution for contaminant release from unsuspended sediment. In unsuspension sediment, convective diffusion is about 10–50 times larger than molecular diffusion during the initial stages under high velocity; it is close to molecular diffusion in the later stages. Convective diffusion is about 6 times larger than molecular diffusion during the initial stages under low velocity, it is about a quarter of molecular diffusion in later stages, and has a similar level with desorption/adsorption. In unsuspended sediment, a seepage boundary layer exists below the water–sediment interface, and various release mechanisms in that layer mostly dominate the contaminant release process. In non-cohesive fine sediment, the depth of that layer increases linearly with shear stress. In cohesive fine sediment, the range seepage boundary is different from that in non-cohesive sediment, and that phenomenon is more obvious under a lower shear stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schindler, D.W., Hecky, R.E.: Eutrophication: More nitrogen data needed. Science 324, 721 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sundareshwar, P.V., Morris, J.T., Koepfler, E.K., et al.: Phosphorus limitation of coastal ecosystem processes. Science 299, 563–565 (2003)

  3. Kim, L.H., Choi, E., Stenstrom, M.K.: Sediment characteristics, phosphorus types and phosphorus release rates between river and lake sediment. Chemosphere 50, 53–61 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fries, J.S.: Predicting interfacial diffusion coefficients for fluxes across the sediment-water interface. J. Hydraul. Eng. 133, 267–272 (2007)

  5. Uncles, R.J., Stephens, J.A., Law, D.J.: Turbidity maximum in the macrotidal, highly turbid Humber Estuary, UK: Flocs, fluid mud, stationary suspensions and tidal bores. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 67, 30–52 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang, D., Wangb, X., Bockelmann-Evans, B.N.: Study on nutrient distribution and interaction with sediment in a macro-tidal estuary. Adv. Water Resour. 52, 207–220 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoon, H.-D., Cox, D.T., Kim, M.: Prediction of time-dependent sediment suspension in the surf zone using artificial neural network. Coast. Eng. 71, 78–86 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hooper, T., Austen, M.: Tidal barrages in the UK: Ecological and social impacts, potential mitigation, and tools to support barrage planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 23, 289–298 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin, X., He, Y., Kirumba, G.: Phosphorus fractions and phosphate sorption-release characteristics of the sediment in the Yangtze River estuary reservoir. Ecol. Eng. 55, 62–66 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chatelain, M., Guizien, K.: Modelling coupled turbulence: Dissolved oxygen dynamics near the sediment–water interface under wind waves and sea swell. Water Res. 44, 1361–1372 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor, B.L., Harvey, J.W.: Scaling hyporheic exchange and its influence on biogeochemical reactions in aquatic ecosystems. Water Resour. Res. 44, 1–17 (2008)

  12. Packman, A.I., Marion, A., Zaramella, M., et al.: Development oflayered sediment structure and its effects on pore water transport and hyporheic exchange. Water Air Soil Pollut. 6, 433–442 (2006)

  13. Hoeg, S., Scholer, H.F., Warnatz, J.: Assessment of interfacial mass transfer in water-unsaturated soils during vapor extraction. J. Contam. Hydrol. 74, 163–195 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu, H., Cheng, P., Zhong, B., et al.: The mechanisms of contaminants release due to incipient motion at sediment–water interface. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 24, 589–594 (2012)

  15. Couceiro, F., Turner, A., Millward, G.E.: Adsorption and desorption kinetics of rhodium (III) and platinum (IV) in turbid suspensions: Potential tracers for sediment transport in estuarine flumes. Mar. Chem. 107, 308–318 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cao, S., Cheng, B., Wang, Q., et al.: Characterization and mechanism of zinc salts as tanning agents. JALCA 108, 428–433 (2013)

  17. Corbett, D.R.: Resuspension and estuarine nutrient cycling: Insights from the Neuse River Estuary. Biogeosci. Discuss. 7, 2767–2798 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mesnage, V., Ogier, S., Bally, G., et al.: Nutrient dynamics at the sediment–water interfacein a Mediterranean lagoon (Thau, France): Influence of biodeposition by shellfish farming activities. Mar. Environ. Res. 63, 257–277 (2007)

  19. Heggie, D.T., Logan, G.A., Smith, C.S., Fredericks, D.J., Palmer, D.: Biogeochemical processes at the sediment–water interface, Bombah Broadwater, Myall Lakes. Hydrobiologia 608, 49–67 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma, F., Jiang, C., Bo Rauen, W.B., et al.: Modelling sediment transport processes in macro-tidal estuary. Sci. China Ser. E. 52, 3368–3375 (2009)

  21. Cheng, P., Zhu, H., Fan, J., Fdei, M., et al.: Numerical research for contaminant release from un-suspended bottom sediment under different hydrodynamic conditions. J. Hydrodyn. 25, 620–627 (2013)

  22. Kun, Z., Cheng, P., Zhong, B., et al.: Total phosphorus release from bottom sediment in flowing water. J. Hydrodyn. 24, 589–594 (2012)

  23. Higashino, M., Gantzer, C.J., Stenfan, H.G.: Unsteady diffusional mass transfer at the sediment/water interface: theory and significance for SOD measurement. Water Res. 38, 1–12 (2004)

  24. Orlins, J.J., Gulliver, J.S.: Turbulence quantification and sediment resuspension in an oscillating grid chamber. Exp. Fluids 34, 662–677 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 11032007)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daozeng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, P., Zhu, H., Zhong, B. et al. Transport mechanisms of contaminants released from fine sediment in rivers. Acta Mech. Sin. 31, 791–798 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0520-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0520-8

Keywords

Navigation