Abstract
A two-stage damage detection approach is proposed and experimentally demonstrated on a complicated spatial model structure with a limited number of measurements. In the experiment, five known damage patterns, including 3 brace damage cases and 2 joint damage cases, were simulated by removing braces and weakening beam-column connections in the structure. The limited acceleration response data generated by hammer impact were used for system identification, and modal parameters were extracted by using the eigensystem realization algorithm. In the first stage, the possible damaged locations are determined by using the damage index and the characteristics of the analytical model itself, and the extent of damage for those substructures identified at stage I is estimated in the second stage by using a second-order eigen-sensitivity approximation method. The main contribution of this paper is to test the two-stage method by using the real dynamic data of a complicated spatial model structure with limited sensors. The analysis results indicate that the two-stage approach is able to detect the location of both damage cases, only the severity of brace damage cases can be assessed, and the reasonable analytical model is critical for successful damage detection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernal, D., Dyke, S.J., Lam, H.F., et al.: Phase II of the ASCE benchmark study on SHM. In: Proceedings of the 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, New York, June 2–5, 2002
Ching, J., Beck, J.L.: Two-step bayesian structural health monitoring approach for IASC-ASCE phase II simulated and experimental benchmark studies. Report No. EERL 2003-02, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California (2003)
Johnson, E.A., Lam, H.F., Katafygiotis, L.S., et al.: Phase I IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark problem using simulated data. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 130(1), 3–15 (2004)
Pothisiri, T., Hjelmstad, K.D.: Structural damage detection and assessment from modal response. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 129(2), 135–145 (2003)
Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S., Zhang, L.M.: Damage localization by directly using incomplete mode shapes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 126(6), 656–660 (2000)
Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B.: A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2), 91–105 (1998)
Xu, L.H., Qian, J.R.: Two-stage damage detection to a benchmark structure using ambient data. In: Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Shenzhen, China, Nov. 16–18, 785–789 (2005)
Kim, J.T., Stubbs, N.: Improved damage identification method based on modal information. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 252(2), 223–238 (2002)
Stubbs, N., Park, S., Sikorsky, C., et al.: A global nondestructive damage assessment methodology for civil engineering structures. International Journal of Systems Science, 31(11), 1361–1373 (2000)
Messina, A., Williams, E.J., Contursi, T.: Structural damage detection by a sensitivity and statistical-based method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 216(5), 791–808 (1998)
Parloo, E., Verboven, P., Guillaume, P., et al.: Sensitivity-based operational mode shape normalization. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 16(5), 757–767 (2002)
Parloo, E., Cauberghe, B., Benedettini, F., et al.: Sensitivitybased operational mode shape normalisation: application to a bridge. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19(1), 43–45 (2005)
Cao, S.Q., Zhang, W.D., Xiao, L.X.: Structural Vibration Modal Analysis-Theory, Experiment and Application. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin, China, 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (90815025, 90715032 and 50808013).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, LH., Li, ZX. & Qian, JR. Test analysis of detection of damage to a complicated spatial model structure. Acta Mech Sin 27, 399–405 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-011-0437-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-011-0437-9