Skip to main content
Log in

Studies of the unsteady supersonic base flows around three afterbodies

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unsteady supersonic base flows around three afterbodies, cylindrical (Cy), boattailed (BT) and three-step (MS), are investigated in this paper. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and two RANS/LES (large-eddy simulation) hybrid methods, detached eddy simulation (DES) and delayed-DES (DDES), are used to predict the base flow characteristics around the baseline Cy afterbody. All the RANS and hybrid methods are based on the two-equation SST (shear-stress transport) model with compressible corrections (CC). According to the comparison of measurements, both DES and DDES can produce more satisfactory results than RANS. RANS can only present the “stable” flow patterns, while the hybrid methods can demonstrate unsteady flow structures. DDES and DES results are little different from one another although the latter exhibits better agreement with the experiment. DES is taken to investigate the 5° BT andthree-step afterbodies. The mean flow data and the instantaneous turbulent coherent structures are compared against available measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mathur T., Dutton J.C.: Velocity and turbulence measurements in supersonic base flow with mass bleed. AIAA J. 34, 1153–1159 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hemin J.L., Dutton J.C.: Supersonic near-wake afterbody boattailing effects on axisymmetric bodies. J. Spacecr. Rockets 31, 1021–1028 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruffin S.M., Gupta A., Marshall D.: Supersonic channel airfoils for reduced drag. AIAA J. 38, 480–486 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Viswanath P.R.: Drag reduction of afterbodies by controlled separated flows. AIAA J. 39, 73–78 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathur N.B., Viswanath P.R.: Drag reduction from square-base afterbodies at high speeds. J. Aircr. 41, 811–820 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrin J.L., Dutton J.C.: Supersonic base flow experiments in the near wake of a cylindrical afterbody. AIAA J. 32, 77–83 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourdon C.J., Dutton J.C.: Planar visualizations of large-scale turbulent structures in axisymmetric supersonic separated flows. Phys. Fluids 11, 201–213 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, H.X., Li, Z.W.: Numerical simulation of hypersonic laminar wake. Acta Mech. Sin. 24, 389-399 (1992) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suzen, Y.B., Hoffmann, K.A.: Investigation of supersonic jet exhaust flow by one- and two-equation turbulence models. AIAA Paper 98–0322 (1998)

  10. Silton, S.I.: Navier–Stokes computation for a spinning projectile from subsonic to supersonic. AIAA paper 2003–3936 (2003)

  11. Fureby, C., Nilsson, Y., Andersson K.: Large eddy simulation of supersonic base flow. AIAA paper 99–0426 (1999)

  12. Sandberg, R.D., Fasel, H.: Direct numerical simulation of transitional supersonic base flows. AIAA paper 2005–0098 (2005)

  13. Forsythe J.R., Hoffmann K.A., Cummings R.M., Squires K.D.: Detached-eddy simulation with compressibility corrections applied to a supersonic axisymmetric base flow. J. Fluids Eng. 124, 991–923 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawai S., Fujii K.: Computational study of supersonic base flow using hybrid turbulence methodology. AIAA J. 43, 1265–1275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xue, B.M., Yang, Y.: Technical details in applying DES method to computing supersonic cylinder-base flow. J. Northwestern Polytech. Univ. 24, 544–547 (2006) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao, Z.X., Fu, S.: Study of the supersonic base flow using RANS/ LES methods. Comput. Phys. (in press) (in Chinese)

  17. Sparlart P.R., Deck S., Shur M.L., Squires K.D., Strelets M., Travin A.: A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Ther. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20, 181–195 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Strelets, M.: Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows. AIAA paper 2001–0879 (2001)

  19. Wilcox D.C: Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J. 26, 1299–1310 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Menter F.R.: Two equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32, 1598–1605 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao Z.X., Zhang Y.F., Huang J.B., Chen H.X., Fu S.: Prediction of separation flows around a 6:1 prolate spheroid using RANS/LES hybrid approaches. Acta Mech. Sin. 23, 369–382 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Menter, FR, Kuntz, M: A zonal SST-DES formulation. DES-WORKSHOP (2003)

  23. Xiao Z.X., Chen H.X., Zhang Y.F., Huang J.B., Fu S.: Study of delayed-detached eddy simulation with weakly nonlinear turbulence model. J. Aircr. 43, 1377–1385 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu S., Xiao Z.X., Chen H.X., Zhang Y.F., Huang J.B.: Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methods. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 28, 1379–1390 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixiang Xiao.

Additional information

The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10502030 and 90505005), Innovation and Support Foundation of Chinese Astronautics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, Z., Fu, S. Studies of the unsteady supersonic base flows around three afterbodies. Acta Mech Sin 25, 471–479 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-009-0248-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-009-0248-4

Keywords

Navigation