Skip to main content
Log in

Pneumologische Rehabilitation

Pulmonary rehabilitation

  • CME - Weiterbildung - Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Pneumologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Eine multimodale, qualitativ hochwertige pneumologische Rehabilitation bietet für Patienten mit chronischen Atemwegs- und Lungenerkrankungen einen kaum zu unterschätzenden Nutzen. Gerade bei der COPD liegt eine überzeugende Datenlage vor, die verschiedene Behandlungsansätze mit höchster Evidenz versieht. Die Summe der positiven Effekte ist für COPD-Patienten denen einer medikamentösen Therapie gleichzusetzen bzw. übersteigt diese mitunter. Effektivität und klinische Relevanz der pneumologischen Rehabilitation werden dargestellt.

Abstract

Comprehensive, multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation may offer substantial benefit for patients with chronic lung diseases. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in particular, the data for different treatment components are convincing with a high level of evidence. The clinical effects that can be achieved using a multimodal rehabilitative approach may be equivalent or even superior to drug therapy. This article outlines the effectiveness and clinical relevance of pulmonary rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. (o A) (2002) Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. Deutsches Institut für medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI), http://www.dimdi.de

  2. Nici L, Donner C et al (2006) ATS/ERS Pulmonary rehabilitation writing committee. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:1390–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ries AL, Bauldoff GS et al (2007) Pulmonary rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 131 (5 Suppl):4S–42S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR) (2008) Rahmenempfehlungen zur ambulanten pneumologischen Rehabilitation 2008. http://www.bar-Frankfurt.de/Rahmenempfehlungen_zur_ambulanten_pneumologischen_Rehabilitation.bar

  5. Lacasse Y et al (2005) Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Coch-rane Review). In: The Cochrane Library (Issue 3), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK

  6. Salman GF et al (2003) Rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med 18:213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Puhan M, Scharplatz M, Troosters T et al (2009) Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Issue 1). Art. No: CD005305. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005305.pub2

  8. Evans RA et al (2009) Pulmonary rehabilitation is successful for COPD irrespective of MRC dyspnoea grade. Respiratory Medicine, doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2009.01.009

  9. Nathell L (2005) Effects on sick leave of an inpatient rehabilitation programme for asthmatics in a randomized trial. Scand J Public Health 33(1):57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buhl R, Berdel D, Criée CP et al (2006) Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit Asthma. Pneumologie 60:139–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. NVLL Asthma: Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie Asthma, Langfassung, Version 1.5, April 2008. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de

  12. Holland A, Hill C (2008) Physical training for interstitial lung disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 4). Art. No.: CD006322. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006322.pub2

  13. Mereles D et al (2006) Exercise and respiratory training improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with severe chronic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 114:1482–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wouters EFM (2002) COPD: systemic effects. Thorax 57:1067–1070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Celli B et al (2004) The body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NEJM 350:1005–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maltais F, LeBlanc P, Jobin J et al (1997) Intensity of training and physiologic adoptions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:555–561

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Aymerich J, Farrero E, Félez MA et al (2003) Risk factors of readmission to hospital for a COPD exacerbation: a prospective study. Thorax 58:100–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Köhnlein T, Schönheit-Kenn U, Kenn K et al (2009) Noninvasive ventilation in pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients. Respir Med (accepted)

  19. Wittmann M, Spohn S et al (2007) COPD-Schulung im Rahmen der stationären Rehabilitation verbessert Lebensqualität und Morbidität. Pneumologie 61:636–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paone G, Serpilli M et al (2008) The combination of a smoking cessation programme with rehabilitation increases stop-smoking rate. J Rehabil Med 40(8):672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kunik ME, Roundy K, Veazey C et al (2005) Surprisingly high prevalence of anxiety and depression in chronic breathing disorders. Chest 127:1205–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwiersch M, Hartl K, Schultz K, Reinecker H (2006) Psychische Komorbiditäten bei pneumologischen Patienten in stationärer Rehabilitation und Indikationsstellung zu psychologischer Beratung/Psychotherapie. Pneumologie 60:474–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Man WD-C, Polkey MI, Donaldson N et al (2004) Community pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalisation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled study. BMJ 329:1209–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Kenn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kenn, K., Schultz, K. Pneumologische Rehabilitation. Pneumologe 6, 251–263 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10405-009-0327-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10405-009-0327-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation