Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, 20:131 | Cite as

Micro-PIV measurements of flows induced by rotating microparticles near a boundary

  • Jamel Ali
  • Hoyeon Kim
  • U. Kei Cheang
  • Min Jun Kim
Research Paper


We report on the hydrodynamics induced by single-digit micron-sized superparamagnetic particles rotating at low Reynolds number and analyze the resultant flow fields using microparticle image velocimetry (µPIV). Magnetic microparticles floating a few nanometers above a glass substrate, in an otherwise quiescent fluid, were actuated wirelessly using a rotating magnetic field controlled using two pairs of orthogonally positioned electromagnetic coils. A high-speed camera was used to sufficiently capture the motion of nanometer-sized seeding particles at 500 frames per second as well as track the rotation of microparticles. Data from µPIV are compared with the analytical solution for Stokes flow generated by a sphere in an infinite fluid and numerical simulations using finite element analysis. Two-dimensional velocity data obtained from stacks of planar flow fields at incremental depths for individual microparticles show non-symmetrical profiles that are an indication of increased viscous effects due to the boundary confining wall. Additionally, the flow fields generated by two particles, at various separation distances, are also analyzed. It is observed that as two synchronously rotating beads, of approximately equal diameter, are placed closed together, complex flows offset, superimpose, and merge into single, larger microvortices. We find that the flow fields generated by two physically bound microparticles, rotating as one unit, are well approximated by the flow generated by a single microparticle with twice the diameter.


Magnetic microparticles Low Reynolds number µPIV Synchronous rotation 



We would like to thank Henry C. Fu and J.D. Martindale at the University of Nevada, Reno, for insightful discussions. This work was funded by National Science Foundation (DMR 1306794), Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) (No. 10052980) awards to Min Jun Kim, and with Government support under and awarded by DoD, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship, 32 CFR 168a, awarded to Jamel Ali.


  1. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids. Volume 1: fluid mechanics. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Wiley: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaoui M, Feuillebois F (2003) Creeping flow around a sphere in a shear flow close to a wall. Q J Mech Appl Math 56:381–410MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheang UK, Kim MJ (2015) Self-assembly of robotic micro- and nanoswimmers using magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 17:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crick FHC, Hughes AFW (1950) The physical properties of cytoplasm. Exp Cell Res 1:37–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldman A, Cox R, Brenner H (1967a) Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall: II Couette flow. Chem Eng Sci 22:653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldman A, Cox RG, Brenner H (1967b) Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall: I motion through a quiescent fluid. Chem Eng Sci 22:637–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grzybowski BA, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2000) Dynamic self-assembly of magnetized, millimetre-sized objects rotating at a liquid–air interface. Nature 405:1033–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heilbrunn LV (1956) The dynamics of living protoplasm. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeffery G (1915) On the steady rotation of a solid of revolution in a viscous fluid. Proc Lond Math Soc 2:327–338MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim MJ, Kim MMJ, Bird JC, Park J, Powers TR, Breuer KS (2004) Particle image velocimetry experiments on a macro-scale model for bacterial flagellar bundling. Exp Fluids 37:782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinnunen P, Sinn I, McNaughton BH, Kopelman R (2010) High frequency asynchronous magnetic bead rotation for improved biosensors. Appl Phys Lett 97:223701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leach J, Mushfique H, Keen S, Di Leonardo R, Ruocco G, Cooper JM, Padgett MJ (2009) Comparison of Faxen’s correction for a microsphere translating or rotating near a surface. Phys Rev E 79:026301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li HF, Yoda M (2008) Multilayer nano-particle image velocimetry (MnPIV) in microscale Poiseuille flows. Meas Sci Technol 19:075402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu QL, Prosperetti A (2010) Wall effects on a rotating sphere. J Fluid Mech 657:1–21CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Lushi E, Vlahovska PM (2015) Periodic and chaotic orbits of plane-confined micro-rotors in creeping flows. J Nonlinear Sci 25:1111–1123MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. McNaughton BH, Kehbein KA, Anker JN, Kopelman R (2006) Sudden breakdown in linear response of a rotationally driven magnetic microparticle and application to physical and chemical microsensing. J Phys Chem B 110:18958–18964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meinhart CD, Wereley ST, Gray MHB (2000) Volume illumination for two-dimensional particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 11:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nguyen KVT, Anker JN (2014) Detecting de-gelation through tissue using magnetically modulated optical nanoprobes (MagMOONs). Sens Actuators B-Chem 205:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Owen D, Mao WB, Alexeev A, Cannon JL, Hesketh PJ (2013) Microbeads for sampling and mixing in a complex sample. Micromachines 4:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petit T, Zhang L, Peyer KE, Kratochvil BE, Nelson BJ (2011) Selective trapping and manipulation of microscale objects using mobile microvortices. Nano Lett 12:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raffel M, Willert CE, Kompenhans J (2013) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Roy BC, Damiano ER (2008) On the motion of a porous sphere in a Stokes flow parallel to a planar confining boundary. J Fluid Mech 606:75–104MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Scharnowski S, Kahler CJ (2013) On the effect of curved streamlines on the accuracy of PIV vector fields. Exp Fluids 54:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seifriz W (1924) An elastic value of protoplasm, with further observations on the viscosity of protoplasm. J Exp Biol 2:1–11Google Scholar
  25. Tierno P, Muruganathan R, Fischer TM (2007) Viscoelasticity of dynamically self-assembled paramagnetic colloidal clusters. Phys Rev Lett 98:028301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tokarev A, Kaufman B, Gu Y, Andrukh T, Adler PH, Kornev KG (2013) Probing viscosity of nanoliter droplets of butterfly saliva by magnetic rotational spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 102:033701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tretiakov KV, Bishop KJM, Grzybowski BA (2009) The dependence between forces and dissipation rates mediating dynamic self-assembly. Soft Matter 5:1279–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yan J, Bae SC, Granick S (2015) Colloidal superstructures programmed into magnetic janus particles. Adv Mater 27:874–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ye Z, Sitti M (2014) Dynamic trapping and two-dimensional transport of swimming microorganisms using a rotating magnetic microrobot. Lab Chip 14:2177–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye Z, Edington C, Russell AJ, Sitti M (2014) Versatile non-contact micro-manipulation method using rotational flows locally induced by magnetic microrobots. Paper presented at the IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, 8 July 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamel Ali
    • 1
  • Hoyeon Kim
    • 2
  • U. Kei Cheang
    • 1
  • Min Jun Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and MechanicsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSouthern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations