Effect of doping ferrocene in the working fluid of electrohydrodynamic (EHD) micropumps

  • M. K. Russel
  • S. M. Hasnain
  • P. R. Selvaganapathy
  • C. Y. Ching
Research Paper

Abstract

The effect of doping ferrocene in the working fluid of electrohydrodynamic micropumps was investigated under the application of DC electric fields. The micropump consisted of 100 planar electrode pairs that were embedded along the bottom wall of a 100-micron-high, 5-mm-wide and 26-mm-long microchannel. The width of the emitter and collector electrodes was 20 and 40 µm, respectively, with inter-electrode spacing of 30 µm. A redox dopant, ferrocene, was diffused homogeneously into the working fluid HFE-7100 at 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 % concentration by weight. The static pressure head generation and flow rate at different back pressure conditions were measured under different applied DC voltages. The current and pressure generated with the doped working fluid were significantly higher than with pure HFE-7100 under an applied DC field. A maximum static pressure of 6.7 kPa and flow rate of 0.47 mL/min at no back pressure were achieved at 700 V.

Keywords

Electrohydrodynamics Micropumps Working fluid Doping Ferrocene 

References

  1. Ahn S-H, Kim Y-K (1998) Fabrication and experiment of a planar micro ion drag pump. Sens Actuators A Phys 70:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirouche F, Zhou Y, Johnson T (2009) Current micropump technologies and their biomedical applications. Microsyst Technol 15:647–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arii K, Schmidt WF (1984) Current injection and light emission in liquid argon and xenon in a divergent electric field. IEEE Trans Electr Insul EI-19(1):16–23Google Scholar
  4. Atten P, Haidara M (1985) Electrical conduction and EHD motion of dielectric liquids in a knife-plane electrode assembly. IEEE Trans Electr Insul EI-20(2):187–198Google Scholar
  5. Atten P, Seyed-Yagoobi J (2003) Electrohydrodynamically induced dielectric liquid flow through pure conduction in point/plane geometry. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 10:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benetis V, Shooshtari A, Foroughi P, Ohadi M (2003) A source-integrated micropump for cooling of high heat flux electronics. In: Semiconductor thermal measurement and management symposium, 2003. Nineteenth annual IEEE, 2003. IEEE, pp 236–241Google Scholar
  7. Bohinsky B, Seyed-Yagoobi J (1990) Induction electrohydrodynamic pumping-selecting an optimum working fluid. In: Industry applications society annual meeting, 1990. Conference record of the 1990 IEEE, 1990. IEEE, pp 795–801Google Scholar
  8. Bourouina T, Bossebuf A, Grandchamp J-P (1997) Design and simulation of an electrostatic micropump for drug-delivery applications. J Micromech Microeng 7:186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryan J, Seyed-Yagoobi J (1991) Experimental study of ion-drag pumping using various working fluids. IEEE Trans Electr Insul 26:647–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryan JE, Seyed-Yagoobi J (1992) An experimental investigation of ion-drag pump in a vertical and axisymmetric configuration. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 28:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butcher M, Neuber A, Cevallos MD, Dickens JC, Krompholz H (2006) Conduction and breakdown mechanisms in transformer oil. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 34:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowley JM, Wright GS, Chato JC (1990) Selecting a working fluid to increase the efficiency and flow rate of an EHD pump. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 26:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darabi J, Rhodes C (2006) CFD modeling of an ion-drag micropump. Sens Actuators A Phys 127:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darabi J, Wang H (2005) Development of an electrohydrodynamic injection micropump and its potential application in pumping fluids in cryogenic cooling systems. J Microelectromech Syst 14:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darabi J, Rada M, Ohadi M, Lawler J (2002) Design, fabrication, and testing of an electrohydrodynamic ion-drag micropump. J Microelectromech Syst 11:684–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. El-Genk MS, Bostanci H (2003) Saturation boiling of HFE-7100 from a copper surface, simulating a microelectronic chip. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:1841–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewing G, Cazes J (2005) Ewing’s analytical instrumentation handbook. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Foroughi P, Benetis V, Ohadi M, Zhao Y, Lawler J (2005) Design, testing and optimization of a micropump for cryogenic spot cooling applications. In: Semiconductor thermal measurement and management symposium, 2005 IEEE twenty first annual IEEE, 2005. IEEE, pp 335–340Google Scholar
  19. Foroughi P, Shooshtari A, Dessiatoun S, Ohadi MM (2010) Experimental characterization of an electrohydrodynamic micropump for cryogenic spot cooling applications. Heat Transf Eng 31:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpern B, Gomer R (1969a) Field emission in liquids. J Chem Phys 51:1031–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halpern B, Gomer R (1969b) Field ionization in liquids. J Chem Phys 51:1048–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jayaram S, Cross J (1994) Effects of ionic impurities on EHD motion and conduction in nonpolar liquids. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 1:1005–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeong S, Seyed-Yagoobi J (2002) Experimental study of electrohydrodynamic pumping through conduction phenomenon. J Electrostat 56:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kazemi PZ, Selvaganapathy PR, Ching CY (2009a) Effect of electrode asymmetry on performance of electrohydrodynamic micropumps. J Microelectromech Syst 18:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazemi PZ, Selvaganapathy PR, Ching CY (2009b) Electrohydrodynamic micropumps with asymmetric electrode geometries for microscale electronics cooling. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 16:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kazemi PZ, Selvaganapathy PR, Ching C (2010) Effect of micropillar electrode spacing on the performance of electrohydrodynamic micropumps. J Electrostat 68:376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noori A, Selvaganapathy PR, Wilson J (2009) Microinjection in a microfluidic format using flexible and compliant channels and electroosmotic dosage control. Lab Chip 9:3202–3211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park JK, Ryu JC, Kim WK, Kang KH (2009) Effect of electric field on electrical conductivity of dielectric liquids mixed with polar additives: DC conductivity. J Phys Chem B 113:12271–12276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pontiga F, Castellanos A (1996) Electrical conduction of electrolyte solutions in nonpolar liquids. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 32:816–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Russel M, Selvaganapathy P, Ching C (2014a) Effect of electrode surface topology on charge injection characteristics in dielectric liquids: an experimental study. J Electrostat 72:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Russel M, Selvaganapathy PR, Ching CY (2014b) Electrohydrodynamic injection micropump with composite gold and single walled carbon nanotube electrodes. IEEE J Microelectromech Syst. doi:10.1109/JMEMS.2015.2421641 Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt WF (1984) Electronic conduction processes in dielectric liquids. IEEE Trans Electr Insul EI-19(5):389–418Google Scholar
  33. Schwabe R, McMillen C, Sharbaugh A (1987) Electrohydrodynamic pumping in distribution transformers: final report. General Electric Co., Corporate Research and Development Center, SchenectadyGoogle Scholar
  34. Stuetzer OM (1959) Ion drag pressure generation. J Appl Phys 30:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang L-J, Wang J-M, Huang Y-L (2004) The micro ion drag pump using indium-tin-oxide (ITO) electrodes to resist aging. Sens Actuators A Phys 111:118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zanello P (2003) Inorganic electrochemistry: theory, practice and applications. Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Russel
    • 1
  • S. M. Hasnain
    • 1
  • P. R. Selvaganapathy
    • 1
  • C. Y. Ching
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations