Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 18, Issue 5–6, pp 931–942 | Cite as

Effective slip in nanoscale flows through thin channels with sinusoidal patterns of wall wettability

  • J. N. Choudhary
  • Subhra DattaEmail author
  • Sanjeev Jain
Research Paper

Abstract

Liquids are known to slip past non-wetting channel walls. The degree of slippage can be patterned locally through engineered variations in topography and/or chemistry. Electro-osmotic flow through a thin slit-like nanochannel with walls of sinusoidally varying slippage is studied through an asymptotic theory that uses the ratio of pattern amplitude to the average slip as a small parameter. The direction of patterning is perpendicular to the applied electric field. No restrictions are placed on the relative magnitudes of the channel height, wavelength of the pattern, the average slip length and the phase shift between the patterns on the walls. A closed-form analytical expression is provided for the effective slip length and tested against limits known from the literature. The results are also generalized for applicability to any unidirectional flow field that might originate from other driving forces such as pressure differential. The asymptotic results are compared with numerical simulations and are found to be in good mutual agreement even for moderate magnitudes of the small parameter in the asymptotic theory.

Keywords

Slip Microfluidics Wettability patterning Electro-osmotic Nanochannel Super-hydrophobic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance from the SERB division, Department of Science and Technology, India (sanction letter no. SB/FTP/ETA-142/2012), is acknowledged. Abhinav Dhar and Shubham Agarwal of IIT Delhi are thanked for their preliminary findings on the numerical aspects of the problem.

References

  1. Ajdari A (1996) Generation of transverse fluid currents and forces by an electric field: electro-osmosis on charge-modulated and undulated surfaces. Phys Rev E 53(5):4996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asmolov SE, Vinogradova OI (2012) Effective slip boundary conditions for arbitrary one-dimensional surfaces. J Fluid Mech 706:108–117CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Asmolov ES, Zhou J, Schmid F, Vinogradova OI (2013a) Effective slip-length tensor for a flow over weakly slipping stripes. Phys Rev E 88(2):023004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asmolov ES, Schmieschek S, Harting J, Vinogradova OI (2013b) Flow past superhydrophobic surfaces with cosine variation in local slip length. Phys Rev E 87(2):023005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audry MC, Piednoir A, Joseph P, Charlaix E (2010) Amplification of electro-osmotic flows by wall slippage: direct measurement on OTS-surfaces. Faraday Discuss 146:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahga SS, Vinogradova OI, Bazant MZ (2010) Anisotropic electro-osmotic flow over super-hydrophobic surfaces. J Fluid Mech 644:245–255CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazant MZ, Vinogradova OI (2008) Tensorial hydrodynamic slip. J Fluid Mech 613:125–134CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Belyaev AV, Vinogradova OI (2010) Effective slip in pressure-driven flow past super-hydrophobic stripes. J Fluid Mech 652:489–499Google Scholar
  9. Belyaev AV, Vinogradova OI (2011) Electro-osmosis on anisotropic super-hydrophobic surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 107:098301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bocquet L, Barrat JL (2007) Flow boundary conditions from nano-to micro scales. Soft Matter 3:685–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaudhury MK, Whitesides GM (1992) How to make water run uphill. Science 256(5063):1539–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi CH, Westin KJA, Breuer KS (2003) Apparent slip flows in hydrophilic and hydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids 15(10):2897–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cieplak M, Koplik J, Banavar JR (2001) Boundary conditions at the fluid-solid interface. Phys Rev Lett 86:803–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cieplak M, Koplik J, Banavar JR (2006) Nanoscale fluid flows in the vicinity of patterned surfaces. arXiv preprint cond-mat/0603475Google Scholar
  15. Datta S, Choudhary JN (2013) Effect of hydrodynamic slippage on electro-osmotic flow in zeta potential patterned nanochannels. Fluid Dyn Res 45(5):055502CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Denn MM (2001) Extrusion instabilities and wall slip. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33(1):265–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dussan EB (1979) On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 11(1):371–400CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Feuillebois F, Bazant MZ, Vinogradova OI (2009) Effective slip over superhydrophobic surfaces in thin channels. Phys Rev Lett 102(2):026001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feuillebois F, Bazant MZ, Vinogradova OI (2010) Transverse flow in thin superhydrophobic channels. Phys Rev E 82(5):055301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghosh U, Chakraborty S (2012) Patterned-wettability-induced alteration of electro-osmosis over charge-modulated surfaces in narrow confinements. Phys Rev E 85(4):046304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendy SC, Jasperse M, Burnell J (2005) Effect of patterned slip on micro-and nanofluidic flows. Phys Rev E 72(1):016303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hocking LM (1976) A moving fluid interface on a rough surface. J Fluid Mech 76(04):801–817CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Joly L, Ybert C, Trizac E, Bocquet L (2006) Liquid friction on charged surfaces: from hydrodynamic slippage to electrokinetics. J Chem Phys 125:204716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamrin K, Bazant MZ, Stone HA (2010) Effective slip boundary conditions for arbitrary periodic surfaces: the surface mobility tensor. J Fluid Mech 658:409–437CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Karniadakis G, Beskok A, Aluru NR (2006). Microflows and nanoflows: fundamentals and simulation, vol 29. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Lauga E, Stone HA (2003) Effective slip in pressure driven stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 489: 55–77Google Scholar
  27. Lauga E, Brenner M, Stone H (2007) Microfluidics: the no-slip boundary condition. Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. Springer, Berlin, pp 1219–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee C, Choi CH (2008) Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip. Phys Rev Lett 101(6):064501CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee T, Charrault E, Neto C (2014) Interfacial slip on rough, patterned and soft surfaces: a review of experiments and simulations. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.015
  30. Levine S, Marriott JR, Robinson K (1975) Theory of electrokinetic flow in a narrow parallel-plate channel. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2 Mol Chem Phys 71:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maali A, Pan Y, Bhushan B, Charlaix E (2012) Hydrodynamic drag-force measurement and slip length on microstructured surfaces. Phys Rev E 85(6):066310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Majumder M, Chopra N, Andrews R, Hinds BJ (2005) Nanoscale hydrodynamics: enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes Nature 438(7064):44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muller VM, Sergeeva IP, Sobolev VD, Churaev NV (1986) “Boundary effects in the theory of electrokinetic phenomena. Colloid J USSR 48:606Google Scholar
  34. Murdock JA (1987) Perturbations: theory and methods, vol 27, Society for Industrial MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  35. Neto C, Evans DR, Bonaccurso E, Butt HJ, Craig VS (2005) Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies. Rep Prog Phys 68(12):2859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ng C, Chu CW (2011) Electrokinetic flows through a parallel-plate channel with slipping stripes on walls. Phys Fluids 23:102002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ng CO, Wang CY (2010) Apparent slip arising from Stokes shear flow over a bidimensional patterned surface. Microfluid Nanofluid 8(3):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ng C, Zhou Q (2012) Electro-osmotic flow through a thin channel with gradually varying wall potential and hydrodynamic slippage. Fluid Dyn Res 44:0555507CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Philip JR (1972) Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik ZAMP 23(3):353–372CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmieschek S, Belyaev AV, Harting J, Vinogradova OI (2012) Tensorial slip of superhydrophobic channels. Phys Rev E 85(1):016324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmitz R, Yordanov S, Butt HJ, Koynov K, Duenweg B (2011) Studying flow close to an interface by total internal reflection fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy: quantitative data analysis. Phys Rev E 84(6):066306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sparreboom W, Van den Berg A, Eijkel JCT (2010) Transport in nanofluidic systems: a review of theory and applications. New J Phys 12:015004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spikes H, Granick S (2003) Equation for slip of simple liquids at smooth solid surfaces. Langmuir 19(12):5065–5071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Squires TM (2008) Electrokinetic flows over inhomogeneously slipping surfaces. Phys Fluids 20:092105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steinberger A, Cottin-Bizonne C, Kleimann P, Charlaix E (2007) High friction on a bubble mattress. Nat Mater 6(9):665–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stone HA, Stroock AD, Ajdari A (2004) Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:381–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stroock AD, Dertinger SK, Whitesides GM, Ajdari A (2002) Patterning flows using grooved surfaces. Anal Chem 74(20):5306–5312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tretheway DC, Meinhart CD (2002) Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 14(3), L9–L12Google Scholar
  49. Van der Heyden FH, Bonthuis DJ, Stein D, Meyer C, Dekker C (2006) Electrokinetic energy conversion efficiency in nanofluidic channels. Nano Lett 6(10):2232–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Dyke M (1987) Slow variations in continuum mechanics. Arch Appl Mech 25:1–45zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Vayssade AL, Lee C, Terriac E, Monti F, Cloitre M, Tabeling P (2014) Dynamical role of slip heterogeneities in confined flows. Phys Rev E 89(5):052309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vinogradova OI, Belyaev AV (2011) Wetting, roughness and flow boundary conditions. J Phys: Condens Matter 23:184104Google Scholar
  53. Vinogradova OI, Koynov K, Best A, Feuillebois F (2009) Direct measurements of hydrophobic slippage using double-focus fluorescence cross-correlation. Phys Rev Lett 102(11):118302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ybert C, Barentin C, Cottin-Bizonne C, Joseph P, Bocquet L (2007) Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys Fluids 19(12):123601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao C, Yang C (2012) Electro-osmotic flows in a microchannel with patterned hydrodynamic slip walls. Electrophoresis 33(6):899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou J, Belyaev AV, Schmid F, Vinogradova OI (2012) Anisotropic flow in stripped super-hydrophobic channels. J Chem Phys 136:194706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu L, Attard P, Neto C (2011) Reliable measurements of interfacial slip by colloid probe atomic force microscopy. II. Hydrodynamic force measurements. Langmuir 27(11):6712–6719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIIT DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations