Originally applied to the accurate, passive positioning of submillimetric devices, recent works proved capillary self-alignment as effective also for larger components and relatively large initial offsets. In this paper, we describe an analytic quasi-static model of 1D capillary restoring forces that generalizes existing geometrical models and extends the validity to large displacements from equilibrium. The piece-wise nature of the model accounts for contact line unpinning singularities ensuing from large perturbations of the liquid meniscus and dewetting of the bounding surfaces. The superior accuracy of the generalized model across the extended displacement range, and particularly beyond the elastic regime as compared to purely elastic models, is supported by finite element simulations and recent experimental evidence. Limits of the model are discussed in relation to the aspect ratio of the meniscus, contact angle hysteresis, tilting and self-alignment dynamics.
Contact Angle Contact Line Capillary Force Liquid Bridge Contact Angle Hysteresis
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research has been funded by the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program (IAP 7/38 MicroMAST) initiated by the Belgian Science Policy Office.
Supplementary material 1 (wmv 8379 KB)
Abbasi S, Zhou A, Baskaran R, Böhringer KF (2008) Part tilting in capillary-based self-assembly: modeling and correction methods. In: IEEE 21st international conference on micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS 2008), pp 1060–1063Google Scholar
Arutinov G, Smits ECP, Mastrangeli M, Van Heck G, van den Brand J, Schoo HFM, Dietzel A (2012) Capillary self-alignment of mesoscopic foil components for sensor-systems-in-foil. J Micromech Microeng 22:115022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arutinov G, Mastrangeli M, Smits ECP, Schoo HFM, Brugger J, Dietzel A (2013) Dynamics of capillary self-alignment for mesoscopic foil devices. Appl Phys Lett 102:144101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arutinov G, Mastrangeli M, Smits ECP, Van Heck G, den Toonder JMJ, Dietzel A (2014) Foil-to-foil
system integration through capillary self-alignment directed by laser patterning. J Microelectromech Syst. doi:10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2321013
Berthier J, Brakke K, Grossi F, Sanchez L, Di Cioccio L (2010) Self-alignment of silicon chips on wafers: a capillary approach. J Appl Phys 108:054905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthier J, Brakke K, Sanchez L, di Cioccio L (2011) Self-alignment of silicon chips on wafers: a numerical investigation of the effect of spreading and wetting. Sens Transducer J 13:44–52Google Scholar
Berthier J, Mermoz S, Brakke K, Sanchez L, Frétigny C, Di Cioccio L (2013) Capillary self-alignment of polygonal chips: a generalization for the shift-restoring force. Microfluid Nanofluid 14:845–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broesch DJ, Frechette J (2012) From concave to convex: capillary bridges in slit pore geometry. Langmuir 28:15548–15554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broesch DJ, Dutka F, Frechette J (2013) Curvature of capillary bridges as a competition between wetting and confinement. Langmuir 29:15558–15564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broesch DJ, Shiang E, Frechette J (2014) Role of substrate aspect ratio on the robustness of capillary alignment. Appl Phys Lett 104:081605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukushima T, Iwata E, Ohara Y, Murugesan M, Bea J, Lee K, Tanaka T, Koyanagi M (2012) Multichip-to-wafer three-dimensional integration technology using chip self-assembly with excimer lamp irradiation. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 59:2956–2963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao S, Zhou Y (2013) Self-alignment of micro-parts using capillary interaction: unified modeling and misalignment analysis. Microelectron Reliab 53:1137–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs HO, Tao AR, Schwartz A, Gracias DH, Whitesides GM (2002) Fabrication of a cylindrical display by patterned assembly. Science 296:323–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuesel RJ, Jacobs HO (2010) Self-assembly of microscopic chiplets at a liquid–liquid–solid interface forming a flexible segmented monocrystalline solar cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:993–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert P (ed) (2013) Surface tension in microsystems. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Lambert P, Mastrangeli M, Valsamis J-B, Degrez G (2010) Spectral analysis and experimental study of lateral capillary dynamics for flip-chip applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 9:797–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenders C, Gauthier M, Cojan R, Lambert P (2012) Three-DOF microrobotic platform based on capillary actuation. IEEE Trans Robot 28:1157–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lienemann J, Greiner A, Korvink JG, Xiong X, Hanein Y, Böhringer KF (2004) Sensor update 13, (Wiley-VCH, 2004) Chap. Modeling, simulation, and experimentation of a promising new packaging technology: parallel fluidic self-assembly of microdevices, pp 3–43Google Scholar
Lienemann J, Weiss D, Greiner A, Kauzlaric D, Grünert O, Korvink JG (2012) Insight into the micro scale dynamics of a micro fluidic wetting-based conveying system by particle based simulation. Microsyst Technol 18:523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limatainen V, Sariola V, Zhou Q (2013) Controlling liquid spreading using microfabricated undercut edges. Adv Mater 25:2275–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrangeli M, Valsamis J-B, van Hoof C, Celis J-P, Lambert P (2010) Lateral capillary forces of cylindrical fluid menisci: a comprehensive quasi-static study. J Micromech Microeng 20:075041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrangeli M, Ruythooren W, Celis J-P, van Hoof C (2011) Challenges for capillary self-assembly of microsystems. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Manuf Technol 1:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patra SK, Lee YC (1991) Quasi-static modeling of the self-alignment mechanism in flip-chip soldering-part I: single solder joint. J Electron Packag 113:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato K, Itoa K, Hata S, Shimokohbe A (2003) Self-alignment of microparts using liquid surface tension–behavior of micropart and alignment characteristics. Precis Eng 27:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sariola V, Jääskeläinen M, Zhou Q (2010) Hybrid microassembly combining robotics and water droplet self-alignment. IEEE Trans Robot 26:965–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott KL, Howe RT, Radke CJ (2003) Model for micropart planarization in capillary-based microassembly. In: 12th International conference on solid-state sensors, actuator and microsystems (transducers), vol 2, pp 1319–1322Google Scholar