Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 18, Issue 5–6, pp 775–784 | Cite as

Water transport in porous hydrogel structures analogous to leaf mesophyll cells

  • Sang Joon LeeEmail author
  • Hyejeong Kim
  • Sungsook Ahn
Research Paper

Abstract

Mass transport in porous materials is widespread in nature, and its usefulness attracts large attention for engineering applications. Plant leaves have nano-/microporous structures to pull water from root to the tip of leaves, and they finally release water to the air. In this hydraulic phenomenon called transpiration, plant leaves provide the main driving force for water transport in plants without any mechanical pump system. The morphological structure of plant leaves has been optimized through a long history of evolution to adapt to the environmental changes. In this aspect, we focus on the morphological features of plant leaves, which probably enhance leaf transpiration. The tissue organization in the hydraulic pathways inside the leaves for transpiration was investigated in this study. Inspired by the morphological structure of mesophyll cells in a plant, two analogous models were fabricated using hydrogel to study the effect of pore size on water transport. One model had nanoporous unitary structure, and the other had nano-/microporous hierarchical structure. As a result, the hydrogel model with nano-/microporous hierarchical structure induced higher evaporation and greater swelling ratio, compared with the model with nanoporous unitary structure. X-ray images of the water transport in the hydrogel models show that the porous structures of mesophyll cells can generate the Laplace pressure at the water–air interface in the air spaces.

Keywords

Agarose gel Cryogel Leaf transpiration Porous material Synchrotron X-ray imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (Grant No. 2008-0061991).

References

  1. Ahn S, Jung SY, Kim HK, Sambasivan A, Lee SJ (2012) Polymeric self-assembly changes by surface-modified and in situ-grown nanoparticles. Polymer 54(3):1004–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn S, Jung SY, Lee SJ (2011) Self-assembly change by gold nanoparticle growth. J Phys Chem C 115(45):22301–22308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Sack L (2010) Viewing leaf structure and evolution from a hydraulic perspective. Funct Plant Biol 37(6):488–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cloke PJ (2003) Principles of radiological physics, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies E, Huang Y, Harper JB, Hook JM, Thomas DS, Burgar IM, Lillford PJ (2010) Dynamics of water in agar gels studied using low and high resolution 1H NMR spectroscopy. Int J Food Sci Technol 45(12):2502–2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feigin L, Svergun D, Taylor GW (1987) Structure analysis by small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ganji F, Vasheghani-Farahani S, Vasheghani-Farahani E (2010) Theoretical description of hydrogel swelling: a review. Iran Polym J 19(5):375–398Google Scholar
  8. Goedecke N, Eijkel J, Manz A (2002) Evaporation driven pumping for chromatography application. Lab Chip 2(4):219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoffman AS (2012) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Sudheesh Kumar P, Nair S, Tamura H (2011) Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv 29(3):322–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li JM, Liu C, Xu Z, Zhang KP, Ke X, Li CY, Wang LD (2011a) A bio-inspired micropump based on stomatal transpiration in plants. Lab Chip 11(16):2785–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li JM, Liu C, Zhang KP, Ke X, Xu Z, Li CY, Wang LD (2011b) A micropump based on water potential difference in plants. Microfluid Nanofluid 11(6):717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lozinsky VI, Damshkaln LG, Bloch KO, Vardi P, Grinberg NV, Burova TV, Grinberg VY (2008) Cryostructuring of polymer systems. XXIX. Preparation and characterization of supermacroporous (spongy) agarose-based cryogels used as three-dimensional scaffolds for culturing insulin-producing cell aggregates. J Appl Polym Sci 108(5):3046–3062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Monaenkova D, Andrukh T, Kornev KG (2012) Wicking of liquids into sagged fabrics. Soft Matter 8(17):4725–4730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Namasivayam V, Larson RG, Burke DT, Burns MA (2003) Transpiration-based micropump for delivering continuous ultra-low flow rates. J Micromech Microeng 13(2):261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Or D, Tuller M (2003) Hydraulic conductivity of partially saturated fractured porous media: flow in a cross-section. Adv Wat Res 26(8):883–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pezron I, Bourgain G, Quere D (1995) Imbibition of a fabric. J Colloid Interface 173(2):319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Plieva FM, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B (2010) Macroporous polysaccharide gels. Macroporous polymers: production properties and biotechnological/biomedical applications. CRC Press, Florida, p 131Google Scholar
  19. Prado K, Maurel C (2013) Regulation of leaf hydraulics: from molecular to whole plant levels. Front Plant Sci 4:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006) Leaf hydraulics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schaefer DW (1989) Polymers, fractals, and ceramic materials. Science 243(4894):1023–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shane M, McCully M, Canny M (2000) Architecture of branch-root junctions in maize: structure of the connecting xylem and the porosity of pit membranes. Ann Bot 85(5):613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taiz L, Zeiger E (2010) Plant physiology, 5th edn. Sinauer Associates, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomas EA, Weislogel MM, Klaus DM (2010) Design considerations for sustainable spacecraft water management systems. Adv Space Res 46(6):761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wheeler TD, Stroock AD (2008) The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree. Nature 455(7210):208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Willmer C, Fricker M (1996) Stomata, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu BM, Li JH (2004) A geometry model for tortuosity of flow path in porous media. Chin Phys Lett 21(8):1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Biofluid and Biomimic ResearchPohang University of Science and TechnologyPohangKorea

Personalised recommendations