Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 97–106 | Cite as

Electrokinetic transport and separation of droplets in a microchannel

  • Ashis Kumar SenEmail author
  • P. Sajeesh
Research Paper


This work presents theoretical, numerical and experimental investigations of electrokinetic transport and separation of droplets in a microchannel. A theoretical model is used to predict that, in case of micron-sized droplets transported by electro-osmotic flow, the drag force is dominant as compared to the dielectrophoretic force. Numerical simulations were performed to capture the transient electrokinetic motion of the droplets using a two-dimensional multi-physics model. The numerical model employs Navier–Stokes equations for the fluid flow and Laplace equation for the electric potential in an Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian framework. A microfluidic chip was fabricated using micromilling followed by solvent-assisted bonding. Experiments were performed with oil-in-water droplets produced using a cross-junction structure and applying electric fields using two cylindrical electrodes located at both ends of a straight microchannel. Droplets of different sizes were produced by controlling the relative flow rates of the discrete and continuous phases and separated along the channel due to the competition between the hydrodynamic and electrical forces. The numerical predictions of the particle transport are in quantitative agreement with the experimental results. The work reported here can be useful for separation and probing of individual biological cells for lab-on-chip applications.


Zeta Potential Drag Force Droplet Size Electric Field Increase Electrokinetic Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank the Science and Engineering Research Council (SERC), Department of Science and Technology, for providing the financial support for the project.


  1. Abkarian M, Faivre M, Stone HA (2006) High-speed microfluidic differential manometer for cellular-scale hydrodynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:538–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abkarian M, Faivre M, Horton R, Smistrup K, Best-Popescu CA, Stone HA (2008) Cellular-scale hydrodynamics. Biomed Mater 3:034011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ai Y, Joo SW, Jiang Y, Xuan X, Qian S (2000) Transient electrophoretic motion of a charged particle through a converging–diverging microchannel: effect of direct current-dielectrophoretic force. Electrophoresis 30:2499–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ai Y, Park S, Zhu J, Xuan X, Beskok A, Qian S (2010) DC electrokinetic particle transport in an l-shaped micro-channel. Langmuir 26(4):2937–2944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ai Ye, Mauroy B, Sharma A, Qian S (2011) Electrokinetic motion of a deformable particle: dielectrophoretic effect. Electrophoresis 32(17):2282–2291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barman U, Baruah P, Sen AK, Mishra SC (2013) Performance studies of an interdigitated electrode electro osmotic flow micropump. J Microsyst Technol. Accepted (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Bhardwaj P, Sen AK (2012) Microfluidic system for rapid enumeration and detection of microparticles. J Fluids Eng 134(11):111401–111408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhardwaj P, Bagdi P, Sen AK (2011) Microfluidic device based on a microhydrocyclone for particle liquid separation. Lab Chip 11:4012–4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruus H (2008) Theoretical microfluidics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0019-923509-4Google Scholar
  10. Chen YC, Chen GY, Lin YC, Wang GJ (2010) A lab-on-a-chip capillary network for red blood cell hydrodynamics. Microfluid Nanofluid 9:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison SM, Sharp KV (2008) Transient simulations of the electrophoretic motion of a cylindrical particle through a 90° corner. Microfluid Nanofluid 4:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doddi SK, Bagchi P (2009) Three-dimensional computational modeling of multiple deformable cells flowing in microvessels. Phys Rev E 79:046318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolnik V, Liu SR, Jovanovich S (2000) Capillary electrophoresis on microchip. Electrophoresis 21:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dondorp AM, Angus BJ, Chotivanich K, Silamut K, Ruangveerayuth R, Hardeman MR, Kager PA, Vreeken J, White NJ (1999) Red blood cell deformability as a predictor of anemia in severe falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60:733–737Google Scholar
  15. Eggleton CD, Popel AS (1998) Large deformation of red blood cell ghosts in a simple shear flow. Phys Fluids 10:1834–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ennis J, Anderson JL (1997) Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of spherical particles for thick double layers and low zeta potential. J Colloid Interf Sci 185:497–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallo-Villanueva RC, Rodriguez-Lopez CE, Diaz-De-La-Garza RI, Reyes-Betanzo C, Lapizco-Encinas BH (2009) DNA manipulation by means of insulator-based dielectrophoresis employing direct current electric fields. Electrophoresis 30:4195–4205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao T, Hu HH (2009) Deformation of elastic particles in viscous shear flow. J Comput Phys 228:2132–2151CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Gloria O, Christina S, Matthew BK, Anubhav T, Anuj C (2008) Electrophoretic migration of proteins in semidilute polymer solutions. Electrophoresis 29:1152–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goet G, Baier T, Hardt S, Sen AK (2013) Isotachophoresis with emulsions. Biomicrofluidics 7(4):044103–044116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graciaa A, Creux P, Dicharry C, Lachaise J (2002) Measurement of the zeta potential of oil drops with the spinning tube Zetameter. J Dispers Sci Technol 23(1–3):301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hase M, Yoshikawa K (2006) Structural transition of acting filament in a cell-sized water droplet with a phospholipid membrane. J Chem Phys 124:104903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsu JP, Kuo CC (2006) Electrophoresis of a finite cylinder positioned eccentrically along the axis of a cylindrical pore. J Phys Chem B 110:17607–17615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsu JP, Yeh LH, Ku MH (2006) Electrophoresis of a spherical particle along the axis of a cylindrical pore filled with a Carreau fluid. Colloid Polym Sci 284:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonassen N (2002) Electrostatics. Springer. ISBN 140-2071-612, 9781402071614Google Scholar
  26. Kang YJ, Li DQ (2009) Electrokinetic motion of particles and cells in microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 6:431–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang KH, Kang YJ, Xuan XC, Li DQ (2006) Continuous separation of microparticles by size with direct current-dielectrophoresis. Electrophoresis 27:694–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keh HJ, Anderson JL (1985) Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of colloidal spheres. J Fluid Mech 153:417–439CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Kemprai P, Sen AK (2012) Electro-kinetic assisted mixing in a microchannel with lateral electrodes. Micro Nanosyst 4(4):304–313Google Scholar
  30. Kirby BJ, Hasselbrink EF Jr (2004) Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 2. Data for polymers. Electrophoresis 25:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korin N, Bransky A, Dinnar U (2007) Theoretical model and experimental study of red blood cell (RBC) deformation in microchannels. J Biomech 40:2088–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leopold K, Dieter B, Ernst K (2004) Capillary electrophoresis of biological particles: viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotic cells. Electrophoresis 25:2282–2291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li D (2004) Electrokinetics in microfluidics. Elsevier Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang LT, Ai Y, Zhu JJ, Qian S, Xuan XC (2010) Wall-induced lateral migration in particle electrophoresis through a rectangular microchannel. J Colloid Interf Sci 347:142–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacMeccan RM, Clausen JR, Neitzel GP, Aidun CK (2009) Simulating 3D deformable particle suspensions using lattice Boltzmann method with discrete external boundary force. J Fluid Mech 618:13–39CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinez-Lopez JI, Moncada-Hernandez H, Baylon-Cardiel JL, Martinez-Chapa SO, Rito-Palomares M, Lapizco-Encinas BH (2009) Characterization of electrokinetic mobility of microparticles in order to improve dielectrophoretic concentration. Anal Bioanal Chem 394:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pietrini AV, Luisi PL (2004) Cell-free protein synthesis through solubilisate exchange in water/oil emulsion compartments. Chem Bio Chem 5:1055–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Risso F, Colle-Paillot F, Zagzoule M (2006) Experimental investigation of a bioartificial capsule flowing in a narrow tube. J Fluid Mech 547:149–173CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Schoch RB, Han JY, Renaud P (2008) Transport phenomena in nanofluidics. Rev Mod Phys 80:839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Secomb TW, Styp-Rekowska B, Pries AR (2007) Two-dimensional simulation of red blood cell deformation and lateral migration in microvessels. Ann Biomed Eng 35:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen AK, Darabi J (2007) Droplet ejection performance of a monolithic thermal inkjet print head. J Micromech Microeng 17:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sen AK, Darabi J, Knapp DR (2011a) Analysis of droplet generation in electrospray using a carbon fiber based microfluidic emitter. J Fluids Engineering 133:0713011–0713018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sen AK, Darabi J, Knapp DR, Liu J (2006) Modeling and characterization of a carbon fiber emitter for electrospray ionization. J Micromech Microeng 16:620–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sen AK, Darabi J, Knapp DR (2007) Modeling and parametric study of a novel multi-spray emitter for ESI-MS applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 3(3):283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sen AK, Darabi J, Knapp DR (2011b) Aerosol formation in electrospray ionization using a microfluidic emitter. IEEE Sens J 11(10):2335–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shizhi Q, Ye A (2012) Electrokinetic particle transport in micro-nanofluidics: direct numerical simulation analysis. Surfactant Science, 19 June 2012 by CRC Press, pp. 197–398Google Scholar
  47. Sugiyama K, Ii S, Takeuchi S, Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2011) A full Eulerian finite difference approach for solving fluid–structure coupling problems. J Comput Phys 230:596–627CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. Swaminathan TN, Gao T, Hu HH (2010) Deformation of a long elastic particle undergoing electrophoresis. J. Colloid Interf Sci 346:270–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tawfik DS, Griffiths AD (1998) Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nat Biotechnol 16:652–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thwar PK, Linderman JJ, Burns MA (2007) Electrodeless direct current dielectrophoresis using reconfigurable field-shaping oil barriers. Electrophoresis 28:4572–4581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tomaiuolo G, Simeone M, Martinelli V, Rotoli B, Guido S (2009) Red blood cell deformation in microconfined flow. Soft Matter 5:3736–3740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomaiuolo G, Barra M, Preziosi V, Cassinese A, Rotoli B, Guido S (2011) Microfluidics analysis of red blood cell membrane viscoelasticity, Lab Chip 2011. Lab Chip 11(3):449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Unni HN, Keh HJ, Yang C (2007) Analysis of electrokinetic transport of a spherical particle in a microchannel. Electrophoresis 28:658–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van den Heuvel MGL, Bondesan R, Lagomarsino MC, Dekker C (2008) Single-molecule observation of anomalous electrohydrodynamic orientation of microtubules. Phys Rev Lett 101:118301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang XJ, Wang XB, Gascoyne PRC (1997) General expressions for dielectrophoretic force and electrorotational torque derived using the Maxwell stress tensor method. J Electrost 39:277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xuan XC, Raghibizadeh R, Li D (2006) Wall effects on electrophoretic motion of spherical polystyrene particles in a rectangular poly (dimethylsiloxane) microchannel. J Colloid Interf Sci 296:743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yariv E (2006) Force-free electrophoresis? Phys Fluids 18:031702CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. Ye CZ, Li DQ (2004) 3-D transient electrophoretic motion of a spherical particle in a T-shaped rectangular microchannel. J. Colloid Interf Sci 272:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ye CZ, Xuan XC, Li DQ (2005) Eccentric electrophoretic motion of a sphere in circular cylindrical microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 1:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhu J, Xuan X (2009) Particle electrophoresis and dielectrophoresis in curved microchannels. J Colloid Interf Sci 340:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations