Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 14, Issue 3–4, pp 469–477 | Cite as

Selective particle and cell clustering at air–liquid interfaces within ultrasonic microfluidic systems

  • Priscilla Rogers
  • Ian Gralinski
  • Cameron Galtry
  • Adrian Neild
Research Paper

Abstract

In this study, we demonstrate particle and cell clustering in distinct patterns on the free surface of microfluidic volumes. Employing ultrasonic actuation, submersed microparticles are forced to two principal positions: nodal lines (pressure minima) of a standing wave within the liquid bulk, and distinct locations on the air–liquid interface (free surface); the latter of which has not been previously demonstrated using ultrasonic standing waves. As such, we unravel the fundamental mechanisms behind such patterns, showing that the contribution of fluid particle velocity variations on the free surface (acoustic radiation force) results in patterned particle clustering. In addition, by varying the size and density of the microparticles (3.5–31 μm polystyrene and 1–5 μm silica), acoustic streaming is found to increase the tendency for a smaller and lighter particle to cluster at the air–liquid interface. This selectivity is exploited for the isolation of multiple microparticle and cell types on the free surface from their nodally aligned counterparts. Free surface clustering is demonstrated in both an open microfluidic chamber and a sessile droplet, as well as using a range of biological species Escherichia coli, blood cells, Ragweed pollen and Paper Mulberry pollen). The ability to selectively cluster submersed microparticles and cells in distinct patterns on the free surface showcases the excellent suitability of this method to lab-on-a-chip systems.

Keywords

Particle manipulation Air–liquid interface Ultrasonic standing waves Acoustic radiation force Acoustic streaming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Australian Research Council (No. DP110104010) for their kind support of this research.

Supplementary material

10404_2012_1065_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
ESM1 (PDF 1810 kb)

References

  1. Augustsson P, Persson J, Ekström S, Ohlin M, Laurell T (2009) Decomplexing biofluids using microchip based acoustophoresis. Lab Chip 9:810–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnkob R, Augustsson P, Laurell T, Bruus H (2010) Measuring the local pressure amplitude in microchannel acoustophoresis. Lab Chip 10:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Falkovich G, Weinberg A, Denissenko P, Lukaschuk S (2005) Surface tension: floater clustering in a standing wave. Nature 435:1045–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gor’Kov L (1962) On the forces acting on a small particle in an acoustical field in an ideal fluid. Sov Phys Dokl 6:773–775Google Scholar
  5. Haake A, Neild A, Radziwill G, Dual J (2005) Positioning, displacement, and localization of cells using ultrasonic forces. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haeberle S, Zengerle R (2007) Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 7:1094–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hawkes J, Barber R, Emerson D, Coakley T (2004) Continuous cell washing and mixing driven by an ultrasound standing wave within a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip 4:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hou D, Maheshwari S, Chang H (2007) Rapid bioparticle concentration and detection by combining a discharge driven vortex with surface enhanced Raman scattering. Biomicrofluidics 1:104–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laurell T, Petersson F, Nilsson A (2007) Chip integrated strategies for acoustic separation and manipulation of cells and particles. Chem Soc Rev 36:492–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li H, Friend J, Yeo L (2008) Microfluidic colloidal island formation and erasure induced by surface acoustic wave radiation. Phys Rev Lett 101:084502Google Scholar
  11. Nam J, Lim H, Kim D, Shin S (2011) Separation of platelets from whole blood using standing surface acoustic waves in a microchannel. Lab Chip 11:3361–3364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neild A, Oberti S, Dual J (2007) Design, modeling and characterization of microfluidic devices for ultrasonic manipulation. Sens Actuators B Chem 121:452–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neild A, Oberti S, Radziwill G, Dual J (2007) Simultaneous positioning of cells into two-dimensional arrays using ultrasound. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:1335–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nilsson A, Petersson F, Jönsson H, Laurell T (2004) Acoustic control of suspended particles in micro fluidic chips. Lab Chip 4:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oberti S, Neild A, Dual J (2007) Manipulation of micrometer sized particles within a micromachined fluidic device to form two-dimensional patterns using ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 121:778–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oberti S, Neild A, Quach R, Dual J (2009) The use of acoustic radiation forces to position particles within fluid droplets. Ultrasonics 49:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petersson F, Nilsson A, Holm C, Jönsson H, Laurell T (2005) Continuous separation of lipid particles from erythrocytes by means of laminar flow and acoustic standing wave forces. Lab Chip 5:20–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Petersson F, Nilsson A, Jönsson H, Laurell T (2005) Carrier medium exchange through ultrasonic particle switching in microfluidic channels. Anal Chem 77:1216–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petersson F, Aberg L, Sward-Nilsson A, Laurell T (2007) Free flow acoustophoresis: microfluidic-based mode of particle and cell separation. Anal Chem 79:5117–5123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Poole R (1977) Fluctuations in buoyant density during the cell cycle of Escherichia coli K12: significance for the preparation of synchronous cultures by age selection. J Gen Microbiol 98:177–186Google Scholar
  21. Rayleigh L (1884) On the circulation of air observed in Kundt’s tubes, and on some allied acoustical problems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 175:1–21zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riley N (1998) Acoustic streaming. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 10:349–356zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spengler J, Coakley W, Christensen K (2003) Microstreaming effects on particle concentration in an ultrasonic standing wave. AIChE J 49:2773–2782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tan M, Friend J, Yeo L (2007) Microparticle collection and concentration via a miniature surface acoustic wave device. Lab Chip 7:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsutsui H, Ho C (2009) Cell separation by non-inertial force fields in microfluidic systems. Mech Res Commun 36:92–103zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiklund M, Hertz H (2006) Ultrasonic enhancement of bead-based bioaffinity assays. Lab Chip 6:1279–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yasuda K, Haupt S, Umemura S, Yagi T, Nishida M, Shibata Y (1997) Using acoustic radiation force as a concentration method for erythrocytes. J Acoust Soc Am 102:642–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yosioka K, Kawasima Y (1955) Acoustic radiation pressure on a compressible sphere. Acustica 5:167–173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priscilla Rogers
    • 1
  • Ian Gralinski
    • 1
  • Cameron Galtry
    • 1
  • Adrian Neild
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations