Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 653–662 | Cite as

Microfluidic liquid actuation through ground-directed electric discharge

  • Carlos Escobedo
  • David SintonEmail author
Research Paper


In this article, we present a new technique to actuate liquids in microchannels using ground-directed electric discharge generated by a portable corona device. When an electric discharge is applied, the air in the microchannel is ionized causing a change in the surface energy. The resulting change in the contact angle induces rapid liquid transport through the channel by capillary action. In contrast to established plasma treatment this method employs a ground electrode that guides the electric field. This approach enables rapid treatment of select microchannels and thus provides a means of real-time fluid actuation as opposed to simply a pretreatment process. Instantaneous fluid velocities show power-law dependence with time and fit theoretical models at a contact angle of 65°. Average fluid velocities are on the order of 5 cm/s, and thus channels on the order of 1-cm long are filled in ~0.2 s. To demonstrate the potential of this technique for integrated lab-on-a-chip applications, the method was employed in serpentine channel, for on-demand fluid routing, to initiate a mixing process, and through an on-chip integrated microelectrode.


Electric discharge Plasma Microfluidic Nanofluidic Contact angle Capillary flow Surface tension Microfluidic liquid actuation Corona 



The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the Canada Research Chairs Program as well as a scholarship to CE and a research grant to DS from the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC). Infrastructure funding from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation is also gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also acknowledge helpful discussions with Te-Chun Wu.

Supplementary material

10404_2011_831_MOESM1_ESM.rar (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (RAR 1738 kb)
10404_2011_831_MOESM2_ESM.rar (822 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (RAR 821 kb)
10404_2011_831_MOESM3_ESM.rar (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (RAR 1727 kb)
10404_2011_831_MOESM4_ESM.rar (791 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (RAR 791 kb)


  1. Adams TM, White AR (2008) Macroscopic conservation equation based model for surface tension driven flow. Adv Fluid Mech Vii 59:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arifin DR, Yeo LY, Friend JR (2007) Microfluidic blood plasma separation via bulk electrohydrodynamic flows. Biomicrofluidics 1(1):014103–014113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bittencourt JA (2004) Fundamentals of plasma physics. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chih-Peng H, Jewell-Larsen NE, Krichtafovitch IA, Montgomery SW, Dibene JT, Mamishev AV (2007) Miniaturization of electrostatic fluid accelerators. J Microelectromech Syst 16(4):809–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70(23):4974–4984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evju JK, Howell PB, Locascio LE, Tarlov MJ, Hickman JJ (2004) Atmospheric pressure microplasmas for modifying sealed microfluidic devices. Appl Phys Lett 84(10):1668–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fair RB (2007) Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? Microfluid Nanofluid 3(3):245–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haubert K, Drier T, Beebe D (2006) PDMS bonding by means of a portable, low-cost corona system. Lab Chip 6(12):1548–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilpert M (2009) Effects of dynamic contact angle on liquid infiltration into horizontal capillary tubes: (Semi)-analytical solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 337(1):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hilpert J, Kern J (1974) Electric wind in a corona discharge—theory and measurement. Arch Elektrotech 56(1):50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horiuchi K, Dutta P (2006) Electrokinetic flow control in microfluidic chips using a field-effect transistor. Lab Chip 6(6):714–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsu CP, Jewell-Larsen NE, Krichtafovitch IA, Montgomery SW, Dibene JT, Mamishev AV (2007) Miniaturization of electrostatic fluid accelerators. J Microelectromech Syst 16(4):809–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Juncker D, Schmid H, Drechsler U, Wolf H, Wolf M, Michel B, de Rooij N, Delamarche E (2002) Autonomous microfluidic capillary system. Anal Chem 74(24):6139–6144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim J, Chaudhury MK, Owen MJ (2000) Hydrophobic recovery of polydimethylsiloxane elastomer exposed to partial electrical discharge. J Colloid Interface Sci 226(2):231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim J, Kido H, Rangel RH, Madou MJ (2008) Passive flow switching valves on a centrifugal microfluidic platform. Sens Actuators B 128(2):613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luk VN, Wheeler AR (2009) A digital microfluidic approach to proteomic sample processing. Anal Chem 81(11):4524–4530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Makamba H, Kim J, Lim K, Park K, Hahn JH (2003) Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels. Electrophoresis 24(21):3607–3619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moreau E (2007) Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators. J Phys D 40(3):605–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson M (1962) A history of electric wind. Am J Phys 30(5):366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seimandi P, Dufour G, Rogier F (2009) An asymptotic model for steady wire-to-wire corona discharges. Math Comput Model 50(3–4):574–583MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun C, Zhang D, Wadsworth LC (1999) Corona treatment of polyolefin films—a review. Adv Polym Technol 18(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sung Kwon C, Hyejin M, Chang-Jin K (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromech Syst 12(1):70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thorsen T, Maerkl SJ, Quake SR (2002) Microfluidic large-scale integration. Science 298:580–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thorslund S, Nikolajeff F (2007) Instant oxidation of closed microchannels. J Micromech Microeng 17(4):N16–N21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Unger MA, Chou HP, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake SR (2000) Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288:113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17(3):273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Whitesides GM, Stroock AD (2001) Flexible methods for microfluidics. Phys Today 54(6):42–48MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yeo LY, Hou D, Maheshswari S, Chang HC (2006) Electrohydrodynamic surface microvortices for mixing and particle trapping. Appl Phys Lett 88(23):233512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zenkiewicz M (2005) Oxidation of the filled-polyolefin-film surface layer by corona treatment. Przem Chem 84(10):733–739Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations