Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Embedding off-the-shelf filter in PDMS chip for microbe sampling

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Filtration for microfluidic sample-collection devices is desirable for sample selection, concentration, preprocessing, and manipulation, but microfabricating the required sub-micrometer structures is an elaborate process. This article presents a simple method to integrate filters in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) devices to sample microorganisms in aqueous environments. An off-the-shelf membrane filter with 0.22-μm pores was embedded in a PDMS layer and sequentially bound with other PDMS channel layers. No leakage was observed during filtration. This device was validated by concentrating a large amount of biomass, from 15 × 107 to 3 × 108 cells/ml of cyanobacterium Synechocystis in simulated sample water with consistent performance across devices. The major advantages of this method are low cost, simple design, straightforward fabrication, and robust performance, enabling wide-utility of chip-based devices for field-deployable operations in environmental microbiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Andersson H, van der Wijngaart W, Enoksson P, Stemme G (2000) Micromachined flow-through filter-chamber for chemical reactions on beads. Sens Actuators B 67(1):203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aran K, Sasso LA, Kamdar N, Zahn JD (2010) Irreversible, direct bonding of nanoporous polymer membranes to PDMS or glass microdevices. Lab Chip 10(5):548–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomeusz DA, Boutte RW, Andrade JD (2005) Xurography: rapid prototyping of microstructures using a cutting plotter. Microelectromech Syst J 14(6):1364–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broyles BS, Jacobson SC, Ramsey JM (2003) Sample filtration, concentration, and separation integrated on microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 75(11):2761–2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao S, Carlson R, Meldrum DR (2007) Rapid fabrication of microchannels using microscale plasma activated templating (μPLAT) generated water molds. Lab Chip 7(5):641–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikelboom DH (2000) Process control of activated sludge plants by microscopic investigation. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Furie B (2003) Clinical hematology and oncology: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardeniers H, van den Berg A (2004) Micro- and nanofluidic devices for environmental and biomedical applications. Lab Chip 84(11):809–819

    Google Scholar 

  • He B, Tan L, Regnier F (1999) Microfabricated filters for microfluidic analytical systems. Anal Chem 71(7):1464–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner RL, Pratt JR (1994) Use of fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples: past and present. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 58(4):603–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W-T, Zhu L (2005) Environmental microbiology-on-a-chip and its future impacts. Trends Biotechnol 23(4):174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marle L, Greenway GM (2005) Microfluidic devices for environmental monitoring. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 24(9):795–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz S, Trautmann C, Bertsch A, Renaud Ph (2004) Polyimide microfluidic devices with integrated nanoporous filtration areas manufactured by micromachining and ion track technology. J Micromech Microeng 14(3):324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng JMK, Gitlin I, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2002) Components for integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis 23(20):3461–3473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noblitt SD, Kraly JR, VanBuren JM, Hering SV, Collett JL, Henry CS (2007) Integrated membrane filters for minimizing hydrodynamic flow and filtering in microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 79(16):6249–6254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul JN, Cholin CS, van den Engh G, Perry MJ (2007) In situ instrumentation. Oceanography 20(2):70

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranvik LJ (1997) Rapid fluorometric assay of bacterial density in lake water and seawater. Limnol Oceanogr 42(7):1629–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Huang B, Zare RN (2005) Construction of microfluidic chips using polydimethylsiloxane for adhesive bonding. Lab Chip 5(12):1393–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Yang JM, Tai Y-C, Ho C-M (1999) Micromachined membrane particle filters. Sens Actuators A 73(1):184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Zhang Q, Feng H, Ang S, Chau FS, Liu W-T (2004) Filter-based microfluidic device as a platform for immunofluorescent assay of microbial cells. Lab Chip 4(4):337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Weimin Gao for assisting with bacterial cell culture, Dr. Weiwen Zhang for technical consulting, Mr. Vivek Nandakumar for assistance with edits. We also thank the SWETTE Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, for providing the wastewater sample and ASU for the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-hui Chao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lécluse, A., Chao, Sh. & Meldrum, D.R. Embedding off-the-shelf filter in PDMS chip for microbe sampling. Microfluid Nanofluid 11, 221–225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0792-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0792-7

Keywords

Navigation