Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 321–335 | Cite as

Study of subsonic–supersonic gas flow through micro/nanoscale nozzles using unstructured DSMC solver

Research Paper

Abstract

We use an extended direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method, applicable to unstructured meshes, to numerically simulate a wide range of rarefaction regimes from subsonic to supersonic flows through micro/nanoscale converging–diverging nozzles. Our unstructured DSMC method considers a uniform distribution of particles, employs proper subcell geometry, and follows an appropriate particle tracking algorithm. Using the unstructured DSMC, we study the effects of back pressure, gas/surface interactions (diffuse/specular reflections), and Knudsen number on the flow field in micro/nanoscale nozzles. If we apply the back pressure at the nozzle outlet, a boundary layer separation occurs before the outlet and a region with reverse flow appears inside the boundary layer. Meanwhile, the core region of inviscid flow experiences multiple shock-expansion waves. In order to accurately simulate the outflow, we extend a buffer zone at the nozzle outlet. We show that a high viscous force creation in the wall boundary layer prevents any supersonic flow formation in the divergent part of the nozzle if the Knudsen number exceeds a moderate magnitude. We also show that the wall boundary layer prevents forming any normal shock in the divergent part. In reality, Mach cores would appear at the nozzle center followed by bow shocks and expansion region. We compare the current DSMC results with the solution of the Navier–Stokes equations subject to the velocity slip and temperature jump boundary conditions. We use OpenFOAM as a compressible flow solver to treat the Navier–Stokes equations.

Keywords

Micro/nanoscale nozzles Rarefied flow Subsonic regime Supersonic regime DSMC Unstructured mesh Navier–Stokes Slip boundary condition OpenFOAM 

References

  1. Agrawal A, Prabhu SV (2008) A survey on measurement of tangential momentum accommodation coefficient. J Vac Sci Technol A 26:634–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A, Djenidi L, Antonia RA (2005) Simulation of gas flow in microchannels with a sudden expansion or contraction. J Fluid Mech 530:135–144MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexeenko AA, Levin DA, Gimelshein SF, Collins RJ, Reed BD (2002) Numerical modeling of axisymmetric and three-dimensional flows in microelectromechanical systems nozzles. AIAA J 40(5):897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexeenko A, Fedosov DA, Gimelshein SF, Levin DA, Collins RJ (2006) Transient heat transfer and gas flow in a MEMS-based thruster. J Microelectromech Syst 15(1):181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird GA (1994) Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird G (2007) Sophisticated DSMC. Notes prepared for a short course at the DSMC07 meeting, Santa Fe, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai C, Boyd ID, Fan J, Candler GV (2000) Direct simulation methods for low-speed microchannel flows. J Thermophys Heat Transf 14(3):368–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darbandi M, Schneider GE (2000) Performance of an analogy-based all speed procedure without any explicit damping. Comput Mech 26:459–469MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darbandi M, Vakilipour S (2007) Developing consistent inlet boundary conditions to study the entrance zone in microchannels. J Thermophys Heat Transf 21(3):596–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darbandi M, Vakilipour S (2009) Solution of thermally developing zone in short micro/nano scale channels. J Heat Transf 131:044501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darbandi M, Roohi E, Mokarizadeh V (2008) Conceptual linearization of Euler governing equations to solve high speed compressible flow using a pressure-based method. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 24:583–604MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Le M, Hassan I, Esmail N (2006) DSMC simulation of subsonic flows in parallel and series microchannels. J Fluids Eng 128:1153–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin CX, Gadepalli V (2009) A computational study of gas flow in a De-Laval micronozzle at different throat diameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 59:1203–1216MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu M, Zhang X, Zhang G, Chen Y (2006) Study on micronozzle flow and propulsion performance using DSMC and continuum methods. Acta Mech Sin 22:409–416MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Louisos WF, Hitt DL (2005) Optimal expander angle for viscous supersonic flow in 2D micro-nozzles. AIAA paper 2005-5032Google Scholar
  16. Louisos WF, Alexeenko AA, Hitt DL, Zilić A (2008) Design considerations for supersonic micronozzles. Int J Manuf Res 3(1):80–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Hare L, Lockerby DA, Reese JM, Emerson DR (2007) Near-wall effects in rarefied gas micro-flows: some modern hydrodynamic approaches. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. OpenFOAM (2009) The Open Source CFD toolbox, user guide, version 1.6Google Scholar
  19. Roohi E, Darbandi M (2009) Extending the Navier–Stokes solutions to transition regime in two-dimensional micro-/nanochannel flows using information preservation scheme. Phys Fluids 21:082001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roohi E, Darbandi M, Mirjalili V (2009) DSMC solution of subsonic flow through micro-nano scale channels. J Heat Transf 131:092402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. San O, Bayraktar I, Bayraktar T (2009) Size and expansion ratio analysis of micro nozzle gas flow. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 36(5):402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shen C, Fan J, Xie C (2003) Statistical simulation of rarefied gas flows in micro channels. J Comput Phys 189:512–526MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun ZX, Li ZY, He YL, Tao WQ (2009) Coupled solid (FVM)–fluid (DSMC) simulation of micro-nozzle with unstructured-grid. J Microfluid Nanofluid 7(5):621–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Titove EV, Levin DA (2007) Extension of DSMC method to high pressure flows. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 21(9–10):351–368CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Uribe FJ, Garcia AL (1999) Burnett description for plane poiseuille flow. Phys Rev E 60(4):4063–4078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vakilipour S, Darbandi M (2009) Advancement in numerical study of gas flow and heat transfer in microchannels. J Thermophys Heat Transf 23(1):205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang M, Li Z (2004) Simulations for gas flows in microgeometries using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25:975–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xie C (2007) Characteristics of micronozzle gas flows. Phys Fluids 19:037102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu J, Zhao C (2007) Two-dimensional numerical simulations of shock waves in micro convergent–divergent nozzles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:2434–2438MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xue H, Ji HM, Shu C (2003) Prediction of flow and heat transfer characteristics in micro-Couette flow. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys Eng 7:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang J, Ye J, Zheng J, Wong I, Ma Y, Lam C, Link S (2009) Improving DSMC with new pressure boundary conditions for heat and mass transfer of microchannel flows. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys Eng 13:165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou Q, Leschziner MA (1999) An improved particle-locating algorithm for Eulerian–Lagrangian computations of two-phase flows in general coordinates. Int J Multiph Flow 25:813–825MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Excellence in Aerospace Systems, Department of Aerospace EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations