Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 565–573 | Cite as

Development of enzyme immobilized monolith micro-reactors integrated with microfluidic electrochemical cell for the evaluation of enzyme kinetics

  • Ping He
  • Gillian Greenway
  • Stephen J. HaswellEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper describes a simple and efficient method for producing an on-chip enzyme immobilized monolith micro-reactor that integrates a microfluidic electrochemical cell for rapid characterization of enzymatic kinetics. The monolith was generated using a sol–gel method, followed by PEI functionalization and enzyme immobilization via electrostatic attraction between electronegative enzymes and electropositive PEI polymers. Using the proposed immobilization strategy, a glucose oxidase (GOD) immobilized monolith micro-reactor has been produced with the controllable porosity that gives better enzyme kinetics compared to previously reported devices. This can be attributed to a favourable enzyme-substrate affinity in which more than 98% of the immobilized enzyme remains in an active conformation. The kinetic studies conducted have identified that a similar value of the k cat is obtained for immobilized GOD (13.4 s−1) and GOD free in solution (14 s−1) whilst the immobilized Michaelis constant K m(app) (7.2 mM) is ~4 times lower than GOD in solution (25 mM). In addition, the immobilized GOD exhibits increased stability, retaining at least 95% of the initial activity when stored of 30 days at 4°C, compared to only 60% for GOD in solution. Furthermore, the same enzyme immobilization strategy has been used for choline oxidase immobilization and similar kinetics to choline oxidase in solution were observed, once again indicating better maintenance of the enzyme conformation provided by the proposed method.

Keywords

Micro-reactor Monolith Immobilization Kinetics Glucose oxidase Choline oxidase 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the EU for funding through project NMP4-CT-2006-033254.

References

  1. Arai G, Noma T, Hayashi M, Yasumori I (1998) Electrochemical characteristics of d-amino acid oxidase immobilized in a conductive redox polymer. J Electroanal Chem 452:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deere J, Magner E, Wall JG, Hodnett BK (2002) Mechanistic and structural features of protein adsorption onto mesoporous silicates. J Phys Chem B 106:7340–7347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeLouise LA, Miller BL (2005) Enzyme immobilization in porous silicon: quantitative analysis of the kinetic parameters for glutathione-s-transferases. Anal Chem 77:1950–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demers N, Agostinelli E, Averill-Bates DA, Fortier G (2001) Immobilization of native and poly(ethylene glycol)-treated (‘PEGylated’) bovine serum amine oxidase into a biocompatible hydrogel. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 33:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fletcher PDI, Haswell SJ, Pombo-Villar E, Warrington BH, Watts P, Wong SYF, Zhang X (2002) Micro reactors: principles and applications in organic synthesis. Tetrahedron 58:4735–4757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Girelli AM, Mattei E (2005) Application of immobilized enzyme reactor in on-line high performance liquid chromatography: a review. J Chromatogr B 819:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gleason NJ, Carbeck JD (2004) Measurement of enzyme kinetics using microscale steady-state kinetic analysis. Langmuir 20:6374–6381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo Z, Xu S, Lei Z, Zou H, Guo B (2003) Immobilized metal-ion chelating capillary microreactor for peptide mapping analysis of proteins by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 24:3633–3639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han Y-J, Stucky GD, Butler A (1999) Mesoporous silicate sequestration and release of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 121:9897–9898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He P, Greenway G, Haswell SJ (2008) The on-line synthesis of enzyme functionalized silica nanoparticles in a micro-reactor using poly ethylenimine polymer and R5 peptide. Nanotechnology 19:315603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilder EF, Svec F, Fréchet JMJ (2002) Polymeric monolithic stationary phases for capillary electrochromatography. Electrophoresis 23:3934–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holden MA, Jung S-Y, Cremer PS (2004) Patterning enzymes inside microfluidic channels via photoattachment chemistry. Anal Chem 76:1838–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honda T, Miyazaki M, Nakamura H (2006) Facile preparation of an enzyme-immobilized microreactor using a cross-linking enzyme membrane on a microchannel surface. Adv Synth Catal 348:2163–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaku T, Karan HI, Okamoto Y (1994) Amperometric glucose sensors based on immobilized glucose oxidase-polyquinone system. Anal Chem 66:1231–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kato M, Inuzuka K, Sakai-Kato K, Toyo’oka T (2005) Monolithic bioreactor immobilizing trypsin for high-throughput analysis. Anal Chem 77:1813–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kawakami K, Sera Y, Sakai S, Ono T, Ijima H (2005) Development and characterization of a silica monolith immobilized enzyme micro-bioreactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerby MB, Legge RS, Tripathi A (2006) Measurements of kinetic parameters in a microfluidic reactor. Anal Chem 78:8273–8280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koh WG, Pishko M (2005) Immobilization of multi-enzyme microreactors inside microfluidic devices. Sens Actuators B 106:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krenková J, Foret F (2004) Immobilized microfluidic enzymatic reactors. Electrophoresis 25:3550–3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laarz E, Bergström L (2000) Dispersing WC–Co powders in aqueous media with polyethylenimine. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater 18:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Legido-Quigley C, Marlin ND, Melin V, Manz A, Smith NW (2003) Advances in capillary electrochromatography and micro-high performance liquid chromatography monolithic columns for separation science. Electrophoresis 24:917–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lei C, Shin Y, Liu J, Ackerman E (2002) Entrapping enzyme in a functionalized nanoporous support. J Am Chem Soc 124:11242–11243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu S, Sun Y (2007) Co-immobilization of glucose oxidase and hexokinase on silicate hybrid sol–gel membrane for glucose and ATP detections. Biosens Bioelectron 22:905–911CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Luckarift HR, Spain JC, Naik RR, Stone MO (2004) Enzyme immobilization in a biomimetic silica support. Nat Biotechnol 22:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mao H, Yang T, Cremer PS (2002) Design and characterization of immobilized enzymes in microfluidic systems. Anal Chem 74:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mersal GAM, Bilitewski U (2005) Development of monolithic enzymatic reactors in glass microchips for the quantitative determination of enzyme substrates using the example of glucose determination via immobilized glucose oxidase. Electrophoresis 26:2303–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murthy ASN, Sharma J (1998) Glucose oxidase bound to self-assembled monolayers of bis(4-pyridyl) disulfide at a gold electrode: amperometric determination of glucose. Anal Chim Acta 363:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nomura A, Shin S, Oulad MO, Kauffmann JM (2004) Preparation, characterization, and application of an enzyme-immobilized magnetic microreactor for flow injection analysis. Anal Chem 76:5498–5502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ota S, Miyazaki S, Matsuoka H, Morisato K, Shintani Y, Nakanishi K (2007) High-throughput protein digestion by trypsin-immobilized monolithic silica with pipette-tip formula. J Biochem Biophys Methods 70:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Park CB, Clark DS (2002) Sol–gel encapsulated enzyme arrays for high-throughput screening of biocatalytic activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 78:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park SS, Cho SI, Kim MS, Kim YK, Kim BG (2003) Integration of on-column immobilized enzyme reactor in microchip electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 24:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peterson DS (2005) Solid supports for micro analytical systems. Lab Chip 5:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson DS, Rohr T, Svec F, Fréchet JMJ (2002) Enzymatic microreactor-on-a-chip: protein mapping using trypsin immobilized on porous polymer monoliths molded in channels of microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 74:4081–4088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers MJ, Brandt KG (1971) Interaction of d-glucal with a niger glucose oxidase. Biochem 10:4624–4630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sakai-Kato K, Kato M, Toyo’oka T (2003) Creation of an on-chip enzyme reactor by encapsulating trypsin in sol−gel on a plastic microchip. Anal Chem 75:388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seong GH, Crooks RM (2002) Efficient mixing and reactions within microfluidic channels using microbead-supported catalysts. J Am Chem Soc 124:13360–13361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seong GH, Heo J, Crooks RM (2003) Measurement of enzyme kinetics using a continuous-flow microfluidic system. Anal Chem 75:3161–3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomsen MS, Pölt P, Nidetzky B (2007) Development of a microfluidic immobilized enzyme reactor. Chem Commun 252:7–2529Google Scholar
  39. Tokeshi M, Kikutani Y, Hibara A, Sato K, Hisamoto H, Kitamori T (2003) Chemical processing on microchips for analysis, synthesis, and bioassay. Electrophoresis 24:3583–3594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Urban PL, Goodall DM, Bruce NC (2006) Enzymatic microreactors in chemical analysis and kinetic studies. Biotechnol Adv 24:42–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verpoorte E (2003) Beads and chips: new recipes for analysis. Lab Chip 3:60N–68NCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vidal J-C, Garcia E, Castillo J-R (1998) Electropolymerization of pyrrole and immobilization of glucose oxidase in a flow system: influence of the operating conditions on analytical performance. Biosens Bioelectron 13:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vodopivec M, Podgornik A, Berovič M, Štrancar A (2003) Characterization of CIM monoliths as enzyme reactors. J Chromatogr B 795:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang B, Li B, Deng Q, Dong S (1998) Amperometric glucose biosensor based on sol–gel organic-inorganic hybrid material. Anal Chem 70:3170–3174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang C, Oleschuk R, Ouchen F, Li J, Thibault P, Harrison DJ (2000) Integration of immobilized trypsin bead beds for protein digestion within a microfluidic chip incorporating capillary electrophoresis separations and an electrospray mass spectrometry interface. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 14:1377–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ping He
    • 1
  • Gillian Greenway
    • 1
  • Stephen J. Haswell
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations