Behavior of confined fluids in nanoslit pores: the normal pressure tensor

  • Tahmineh (Ezzat) Keshavarzi
  • Farideh Sedaghat
  • G. Ali MansooriEmail author
Research Paper


The aim of our research is to develop a theory, which can predict the behavior of confined fluids in nanoslit pores. The nanoslit pores studied in this work consist of two structureless and parallel walls in the xy plane located at z = 0 and z = H, in equilibrium with a bulk homogeneous fluid at the same temperature and at a given uniform bulk density. We have derived the following general equation for prediction of the normal pressure tensor P zz of confined inhomogeneous fluids in nanoslit pores:
$$ P_{zz} = kT\rho \left( {r_{1z} } \right)\left[ {1 + \frac{1}{kT}\frac{{\partial \phi_{\text{ext}} }}{{\partial r_{1z} }}{\text{d}}r_{1z} } \right] - \frac{1}{2}\int\limits_{v} {\varphi^{\prime}(\vec{r}_{12} )\rho^{(2)} \left( {\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}} {r}_{12} ,\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}} {r}_{1} } \right)} \frac{{(r_{12z} )^{2} }}{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}} {r}_{12} }}{\text{d}}\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}} {r}_{12} , $$
where \( \vec{r}_{12} \equiv \vec{r}_{1} - \vec{r}_{2} \) is the intermolecular position vector of molecule 2 with respect to molecule 1 and \( r_{12z} = |\vec{r}_{12} |_{z} \) is the projection of distance of molecule 1 from molecule 2 in the z-direction. This equation may be solved for any fluid possessing a defined intermolecular pair-potential energy function, \( \varphi \left( {\vec{r}_{12} } \right) ,\) confined in a nanoslit pore and with a given fluid molecules—wall interaction potential function ϕ ext. As an important example of its application we have solved this equation for the hard-sphere fluid confined between two parallel–structureless hard walls with different nanometer distances and at various uniform bulk densities. Our results indicate the oscillatory form of the normal pressure tensor versus distance from the wall at high densities. As the density of the nanoconfined fluid decreases, the height and depth of the normal pressure tensor oscillations are reduced.


Behavior of nano-confined fluid Hard-sphere fluid Nanoconfined fluid Nanoslit pore Normal pressure tensor Stress tensor 


  1. Brovchenko I, Geiger A, Oleinikova A (2004) Water in nanopores: II. Coexistence curves from Gibbs ensemble Monte Carlo simulation. J Chem Phys 120:1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carbajal-Tinoco MD, Castro-Roman F, Arauz-Lara JL (1996) Static properties of confined colloidal suspensions. Phys Rev E 53:3745–3749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen LJ, Ely JF, Mansoori GA (1987) Mean density approximation and hard-sphere expansion theory. Fluid Phase Equilib 37:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher IZ, Switz TM (1964) Statistical theory of liquids. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Fortini A, Dijkstra M (2006) Phase behaviour of hard sphere confined between parallel hard plates: manipulation of colloidal crystal structure by confinement. J Phys Cond Matter 18:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu D (2006) Investigation of excess adsorption, solvation force, and plate–fluid interfacial tension for Lennard–Jones fluid confined in slit pores. J Chem Phys 124:164701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gotzelmann M, Dietrich S (1996) Density profiles and pair correlation function of hard sphere in narrow silts. Phys Rev E 55:2993–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Irving JH, Kirkwood J (1950) The statistical mechanical theory of transport processes. IV. The equation of state. J Chem Phys 18(6):817–829CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Kamalvand M, Keshavarzi E, Mansoori GA (2008) Behavior of the confined hard-sphere fluid within nanoslits: a fundamental-measure density-functional theory study. Int J Nanosci 7(4&5):245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kekicheff P, Richetti P (1992) Direct measurement of depletion and structural forces in a micellar system. Phys Rev Lett 68:1951–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keshavarzi T, Sohrabi R, Mansoori GA (2006) An analytic model for nano confined fluids phase-transition: applications for confined fluids in nanotube and nanoslit. J Comput Theor Nanosci 3(1):134–141Google Scholar
  12. Mansoori GA (1977) Thermodynamics of systems at high pressures (Soft-Sphere Model). In: Seventh thermophysical properties symposium series, pp 442–450Google Scholar
  13. Mansoori GA (2005) Principles of nanotechnology: molecular-based study of condensed matter in small systems. World Science Publication Co., HackensackGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansoori GA, Canfield FB (1970) Perturbation and variational approaches to the equilibrium thermodynamic properties of liquids and phase transitions. Ind Eng Chem (Monthly) 62(8):12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansoori GA, Kioussis N (1985) A new thermodynamic model for the hard-core fluid with a Yukawa Tail. J Chem Phys 82:2076–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parker JL, Richetti P, Kekicheff P, Sarman S (1992) Direct measurement of structural forces in a supermolecular fluid. Phys Rev Lett 68:1955–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmidt M, Lowen H (1997) Phase diagram of hard spheres confined between two parallel plates. Phys Rev E 55(6):7228–7241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang W, Li D (2007) Simulation of low speed 3D nanochannel flow. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 3(4):417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ziarani AS, Mohamad AA (2006) A molecular dynamics study of perturbed Poiseuille flow in a nanochannel. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 2(1):12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tahmineh (Ezzat) Keshavarzi
    • 2
  • Farideh Sedaghat
    • 2
  • G. Ali Mansoori
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BioEngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations